Deal Or No Deal? Your Neighborhood Self-Service Laundry Is F

Deal or No Deal? Your neighborhood self-service laundry is for sale and you consider investing in this business

Your neighborhood self-service laundry is for sale and you are evaluating whether to invest in this business. The purchase price for the business alone (excluding land and building) is $240,000. The business generates net cash flows of $30,000 annually for the next five years. You plan to finance the purchase by borrowing at an interest rate of 5%. Your task involves calculating the net present value (NPV) of the project, determining the simple payback period, and assessing whether this is a good investment, along with estimating an appropriate purchase price.

Paper For Above instruction

Investing in a small business such as a neighborhood self-service laundry can be an attractive opportunity, but it requires careful financial analysis to determine its viability. The core financial methods used include calculating the net present value (NPV), assessing the payback period, and evaluating whether the investment aligns with personal or institutional criteria for a good investment.

Net Present Value Calculation

The net present value is used to determine the value of the project by discounting its future cash flows to their present worth and subtracting the initial investment. The formula for NPV is:

NPV = (Sum of Present Value of Cash Flows) - Initial Investment

Given data include an initial investment of $240,000, annual cash flows of $30,000 for five years, and a discount rate of 5%. Each year's cash flow is discounted back to its present value using the formula:

PV = Cash Flow / (1 + r)^n

Where r is the discount rate (0.05), and n is the year index. The calculation is as follows:

  • Year 1: $30,000 / (1 + 0.05)^1 = $28,571.43
  • Year 2: $30,000 / (1 + 0.05)^2 = $27,210.39
  • Year 3: $30,000 / (1 + 0.05)^3 = $25,915.56
  • Year 4: $30,000 / (1 + 0.05)^4 = $24,681.49
  • Year 5: $30,000 / (1 + 0.05)^5 = $23,512.38

The sum of these present values is:

$28,571.43 + $27,210.39 + $25,915.56 + $24,681.49 + $23,512.38 = $129,891.25

Subtracting the initial investment gives the NPV:

NPV = $129,891.25 - $240,000 = -$110,108.75

This negative NPV suggests the project is not financially attractive at the given parameters because the present value of cash inflows doesn't cover the initial outlay.

Simple Payback Period Calculation

The payback period measures how long it takes to recover the initial investment from cash flows. Since annual cash flows are $30,000, and the initial investment is $240,000, the payback period is:

Payback period = Initial Investment / Annual Cash Flow = $240,000 / $30,000 = 8 years

Given your desired payback period is 5 years, this project exceeds that threshold, indicating a longer recovery time and potentially less attractiveness based solely on payback period.

Assessing Investment Viability

Based on the NPV being negative, the investment would not be considered profitable under current assumptions. For an investment to be compelling, the NPV should be positive, indicating that the project adds value. Alternatively, investors might consider negotiating a lower purchase price to improve the project's financial metrics. To determine a fair purchase price where the NPV is zero (the breakeven point), the following calculation is performed:

Breakeven Purchase Price = Sum of Present Values of Cash Flows over 5 years = $129,891.25

This implies that, to make the project financially viable (NPV = 0), the purchase price should not exceed approximately $129,891.25. Buying at this price would yield a breakeven scenario, considering the cash flows and discount rate.

Conclusion and Recommendations

In summary, the analysis indicates that, given the current purchase price of $240,000, the project generates a negative NPV and has a payback period longer than desired. Unless the purchase price can be negotiated downward to around $130,000 or the cash flow projections increase, this investment appears financially unattractive. Investors should consider other factors such as potential for revenue growth, market conditions, or alternative financing options before proceeding. A thorough due diligence process would also include assessing the stability of cash flows and the competitive landscape of the laundry business.

References

  • Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2020). Principles of Corporate Finance (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jordan, B. D. (2019). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Damodaran, A. (2012). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Fernandez, P. (2019). Discounted Cash Flow Analysis: A Practical Approach. Journal of Business Valuation & Economic Loss Analysis.
  • Higgins, R. C. (2018). Analysis for Financial Management (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2015). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (6th ed.). Wiley Finance.
  • Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187-243.
  • Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
  • Copeland, T., Weston, J., & Shastri, K. (2005). Financial Theory and Corporate Policy (4th ed.). Pearson.
  • Harvard Business School Publishing. (2010). Small Business Finance: An Owner’s Guide. Harvard Business Review Press.

```

Related Assignments