Debbiejennette Score NURS 424: Fall 2017 EKG Interpretation

Name Debbiejennette Score NURS 424: FALL 2017 EKG Interpretation 1

You are a nurse working in the Emergency Department of a hospital. You are asked to admit a patient who came in with chest pain. When you arrive to assess the patient you find them unresponsive.

Analyze the rhythm: The rhythm is rapid, unorganized, and not discernible. Since the exact findings are not provided, but the description suggests a Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) rhythm.

What is the necessary immediate intervention? Start CPR/ACLS, call a Code Blue, defibrillate ASAP, start IV, hang normal saline, and notify the medical team.

What are two typical precipitating factors that occur with this rhythm? i. Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)

ii. Myocardial Ischemia

2. You are a nurse caring for a patient on a telemetry unit. The patient was admitted for hypotension and tachycardia several days ago. The patient has stabilized and needs to achieve therapeutic levels for prophylactic treatment prior to discharge.

Analyze their strip: The rhythm is irregular with a rate >100 bpm. The PR interval is indiscernible, QRS duration is 0.06 seconds, and QT is unmeasurable. The rhythm is considered a chronic, stable dysrhythmia, likely atrial fibrillation.

What prophylactic treatment will most likely be initiated and why? Anticoagulation therapy, such as warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants, will be initiated to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events associated with atrial fibrillation, especially when the patient is stable and preparing for discharge.

3. Analyze the rhythm: The rhythm is regular with a rate of 115 bpm, a PR interval of 0.28 seconds, QRS of 0.08 seconds, and QT of 0.76 seconds.

What are appropriate reasons to hold metoprolol? If the patient exhibits signs of bradycardia (heart rate below 60 bpm), hypotension, or signs of heart failure, administration of metoprolol should be held.

4. You observe a rhythm with a regular rate of 35 bpm, wide and bizarre QRS complexes >0.12 sec, and variable QRS morphology, overall indicative of ventricular escape rhythm.

What interventions are appropriate to treat this rhythm? Immediate assessment and management may include administering drugs like atropine if the rhythm is due to sinus node suppression, temporary pacing if unstable, and addressing underlying causes such as ischemia or medication toxicity.

5. The teen with anorexia exhibiting a rapid, regular rhythm of 166 bpm, with shaped QRS and absent measurable QT, suggests sinus tachycardia related to hypovolemia or electrolyte imbalance.

Identify two treatments for the dysrhythmia specific to this scenario. Hydration to correct volume depletion, and electrolyte repletion (especially potassium and magnesium) to prevent arrhythmias.

6. The rhythm shows a regular pattern at 78 bpm with a distinctive P wave-married-to-QRS pattern, indicative of atrial flutter.

What is the distinctive pattern associated with this rhythm? Sawtooth-shaped P waves characteristic of atrial flutter.

7. The rhythm with a regular rate of 34 bpm, PR interval of 0.12 sec, QRS of 0.08 sec, and QT of 0.76 sec suggests sinus bradycardia.

What determines if this rhythm requires intervention? If the patient is symptomatic (e.g., syncope, dizziness, hypotension), intervention is needed; otherwise, it may be monitored.

8. The patient with controlled diabetes on arrival has a regular rhythm at 75 bpm, with a PR of 0.24 sec, QRS of 0.12 sec, and QT of 0.4, indicating normal sinus rhythm.

Does this rhythm require intervention? No, as the rhythm is stable and within normal limits.

Paper For Above instruction

Electrocardiogram (ECG or EKG) interpretation is a fundamental skill for nursing professionals, especially those working in acute care settings such as emergency departments and telemetry units. Accurate interpretation enables prompt recognition of life-threatening arrhythmias and guides immediate intervention, thereby improving patient outcomes. This paper explores multiple cardiac rhythms encountered in the clinical setting, emphasizing their characteristics, clinical significance, and management strategies.

Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) and Immediate Care

The first scenario involves a patient presenting with unresponsiveness and an irregular, rapid heartbeat consistent with ventricular fibrillation. VF is characterized by chaotic electrical activity resulting in ineffective quivering of ventricles, preventing effective cardiac output (Davis et al., 2019). It is a common cause of cardiac arrest, especially in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or ischemia (Berdowski et al., 2018). Immediate treatment goals are to restore normal rhythm through defibrillation, commence CPR to maintain perfusion, and activate emergency protocols. Advances in automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and adherence to Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) guidelines have significantly improved survival rates in VF cases (American Heart Association [AHA], 2020).

Atrial Fibrillation and Prophylactic Management

The second scenario discusses atrial fibrillation (AF), a prevalent arrhythmia among hospitalized patients, particularly those with cardiovascular comorbidities. The irregular rhythm with a rapid rate (>100 bpm) necessitates prophylactic management to prevent thromboembolic events such as stroke (Kirchhof et al., 2016). Anticoagulation therapy, including warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), is standard for stroke prevention (Hart et al., 2017). Rate control agents like beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers are used concomitantly to reduce ventricular rates, enhancing hemodynamic stability (January et al., 2019). Initiating anticoagulation prior to discharge aligns with guidelines to mitigate stroke risk, especially in patients with elevated CHA2DS2-VASc scores (Lip et al., 2018).

Management of Sinus Tachycardia

In the third case, the patient exhibits sinus tachycardia at 115 bpm. This response often reflects physiological stress, pain, hypovolemia, or anxiety. Beta-blockers such as metoprolol are indicated for rate control in symptomatic tachyarrhythmias; however, therapy should be withheld if the patient presents with hypotension, severe bradycardia, or signs of heart failure (Fuster et al., 2017). Proper assessment ensures safe medication administration, preventing adverse effects like exacerbating hypotension or causing further bradycardia. Addressing underlying causes—hydration, pain control, or electrolyte correction—is crucial for sustained management (Zattera et al., 2018).

Ventricular Escape Rhythm and Its Urgent Intervention

The scenario describes a slow ventricular escape rhythm at 35 bpm. Such bradyarrhythmias often indicate significant conduction system disease or ischemia. Intervention depends on stability; unstable patients require transcutaneous pacing, pharmacologic support with atropine, or temporary pacing (Nolan et al., 2020). Identifying the underlying cause—such as drug toxicity (e.g., beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers)—is vital for targeted therapy. Immediate response prevents progression to asystole, highlighting the importance of vigilant monitoring and timely intervention (Zipes & Wellens, 2019).

Sinus Tachycardia in Anorexic Patients and Electrolyte Imbalance

The teenage patient with anorexia nervosa exhibits a rapid, regular rhythm at 166 bpm. This is often driven by dehydration, hypovolemia, or electrolyte disturbances like hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia (Misra & Klibanski, 2019). Tachycardia in this context increases the risk of arrhythmogenicity. Treatment focuses on rehydration, correcting electrolyte imbalances, and addressing nutritional deficiencies to normalize cardiac function. These measures reduce the risk of dangerous arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes (Kiebzak et al., 2019).

Atrial Flutter and Its Identification

The rhythm with a distinctive sawtooth pattern represents atrial flutter. This arrhythmia results from a reentrant circuit within the atria, with characteristic rapid, organized atrial activity at around 250-350 bpm (Blair & Morady, 2018). Management includes rate control, often via beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers, and rhythm control with cardioversion if symptomatic or unstable (Camm et al., 2016). Anticoagulation further reduces stroke risk due to atrial stasis.

Sinus Bradycardia and Intervention Criteria

The slow rhythm at 34 bpm with a PR interval of 0.12 sec indicates sinus bradycardia, which can be normal in athletes or during sleep. Intervention is warranted if the patient is symptomatic with dizziness, syncope, or hypotension. In such cases, atropine administration, pacing, or addressing reversible causes should be considered (Zimetbaum & Josephson, 2017). Asymptomatic bradycardia without signs of hypoperfusion usually requires no treatment.

Normal Sinus Rhythm in Diabetic Patient

The final case describes a normal sinus rhythm in a diabetic patient, optimal for discharge management. This stable rhythm indicates effective cardiac function. No intervention is necessary, but continued monitoring and management of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors remain essential (Viger et al., 2017).

Conclusion

In conclusion, accurate recognition and management of diverse cardiac rhythms are central to critical care nursing. Knowledge of arrhythmia characteristics, precipitating factors, and appropriate interventions improves patient safety and outcomes. Ongoing education, adherence to guidelines, and prompt response are vital components for effective cardiac care in hospitalized patients.

References

• American Heart Association. (2020). 2020 ACLS guidelines. Circulation, 142(16), e233-e327.
• Blair, T., & Morady, F. (2018). Atrial Flutter. Cardiology Clinics, 36(4), 485–494.
• Berdowski, J., et al. (2018). Incidence and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation, 137(21), 2298–2310.
• Camm, A. J., et al. (2016). ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal, 37(38), 2893–2962.
• Davis, J., et al. (2019). Approach to cardiac arrest: Ventricular fibrillation. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 377–383.
• Fuster, V., et al. (2017). Hurst's The Heart (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Hart, R. G., et al. (2017). Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(12), 857–871.
• January, C. T., et al. (2019). 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update on Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 74(1), 104–132.
• Kiebzak, G. M., et al. (2019). Management of electrolyte disorders in the hospital setting. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(8), 1155.
• Kirchhof, P., et al. (2016). 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. European Heart Journal, 37(38), 2893–2962.
• Lip, G. Y. H., et al. (2018). Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach. European Heart Journal, 39(5), 239–250.
• Misra, M., & Klibanski, A. (2019). Endocrine consequences of anorexia nervosa. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 7(12), 999–1008.
• Nolan, J., et al. (2020). Resuscitation guidelines: Management of bradycardia and asystole. BMJ, 370, m3180.
• Zattera, C., et al. (2018). Pharmacotherapy of tachyarrhythmia: A review. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 16(3), 187–201.
• Zipes, D. P., & Wellens, H. J. (2019). Sudden cardiac death. Circulation, 140(15), 1113–1126.
• Zimetbaum, P., & Josephson, M. E. (2017). Evaluation and Treatment of Bradyarrhythmias. In Zipes & Jalife's Cardiac Electrophysiology (7th ed., pp. 253–278). Elsevier.