Deductive Reasoning CRT205 Version 82 Argument 1 Trainer

Deductive Reasoningcrt205 Version 82argument 1trainer Or Cleanerjohn

Deductive Reasoning CRT/205 Version Argument 1 Trainer or Cleaner John is the owner of a gym with approximately five trainers on his payroll. Only a few of those trainers are considered full-time employees. Chris, one of these full-time personal trainers, is well liked by his clients and he consistently has a full schedule. Between clients and even before this gym opens, Chris tries to make sure the gym is clean. He washes down equipment, cleans bathrooms, and ensures the general appearance of magazine baskets looks good.

As a full-time trainer; however, Chris has his hands full and after months of pitching in and working to keep the gym clean, he’s frustrated. He discovers his boss, John, no longer cleans because he assumes Chris will. Chris feels taken advantage of and wants John to recognize his role as a trainer first. He also wants John to consider the extra work cleaning involves. He is arguing for a raise or at least, special compensation for the cleaning should he continue it.

For now, though, he is “on strike” from cleaning. He presents his findings to John who is not yet ready to compromise. Argument 2 Buying a Car Mark and Sally are a young, married couple considering the purchase of a new car. Mark feels his 10-year-old, four-door sedan is still working fine and there is no need to spend more money. Sally, who is 5 months pregnant, believes that the couple should invest in something newer and safer for their future children.

Sally argues that the new car will be an investment for the future. Mark agrees to look but wants Sally to agree to lease a car first. Sally wants to invest in the future and argues that the long-term cost of a new vehicle will be less than leasing. She also argues that a lease will keep the couple from selling the vehicle should it not meet the family’s needs. Based on these factors, Sally wants to purchase a nice roomy van with automatic doors and extra safety features.

Mark; however, eyes a new jeep that would accommodate a baby without giving up his young, carefree style. Though Mark is anxious to have the car of his dreams, he also knows that money is a factor. Mark and Sally have much to discuss to ensure they make the right purchase. Consider the factors that will help them make a decision as you address the questions in the assignment. Argument 3 Buying a Home Versus Renting an Apartment In today’s economy, the risk of home ownership can be considered too much for the average buyer; however, several reasons exist to choose a home over a rental.

First, homeowners are allowed to deduct mortgage interest from their income taxes. A future sale of the house can also result in capital gains. Then, because interest rates are at, what is often labeled, an historic low, buyers can borrow money at a lower cost. This also leads to a lower money payment. Aside from the financial advantages, buying a home can lead to freedom from the rules that plague apartment renters.

Decorating a house, landscaping the lawn, and making changes are all possibilities. Privacy is also a factor, as homeowners do not have to worry about sharing common space with neighbors. Finally, the purchase of a home leads to a feeling of permanence. Homeowners do not need to worry about rental agreements or lease issues. Argument 4 Public Versus Private School Continual debates exist over whether to send a child to public or private school.

Many issues are involved leading to perhaps a more difficult decision than first envisioned. Factors begin with the cost of tuition. The average taxpayer is helping to pay for public schools through their taxes. Because this is already being done, does the taxpayer also want to pay for an additional tuition? If money is not an issue, the family must look at the admission rates.

Whereas public school is open to all, many private schools have specific admission requirements. Adding to this is the right of that private school to be selective with the enrollment and even, the expelling of students. Class size is certainly a factor. At a private school, the student will have more opportunity to engage the teacher and have learning individualized. Safety, location, and overall privacy are other benefits to private school education.

In terms of education itself, because private schools are not tied to the government, they are not required to offer special education to those who may need it. Public schools not only offer this special education, they also make available special programs, academic and health-related programs and also, a free or reduced lunch program. Finally, when looking at the debate, the student must be considered. How will he or she feel about the choice? Will the student be comfortable in the chosen environment?

When making this decision you will note a correct answer for whether private or public school education is best is not to be found. The best step to take is to choose what is right for you and your student. In addition, it will be important to research and assess all the information available from cost to statistics as well as to visit each school to learn more. Only after such research is done will an informed decision be made. Argument 5 To Cheat or Not to Cheat Jenna is currently struggling in her Critical Thinking class.

Outside of school, she is also struggling with personal issues, including an ill parent. She meets an old friend, Cyndi, who has already taken the course and suggests that Jenna can pass the course just by using some of the homework help sites on the Internet. Jenna knows that she has little time left to study but has always been committed to ensuring her work does not violate the academic honesty code of conduct. The two friends begin a discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of cheating. Cyndi tells her it’s easy and people cheat all the time.

She argues that cheating doesn’t make her any less of a person. “There are just those times when you need the extra help.†Even though Jenna knows it was easy for Cyndi, she can’t help but think of how the cheating will eventually hurt Cyndi. Jenna knows how she would be uncomfortable knowing that the work she submitted was not her own. She would feel guilty and not be able to face her parents. Still, she tells Cyndi she will think about it rather than argue further with her friend who she knows will not change her mind.

Paper For Above instruction

Deductive reasoning is a significant method of logical analysis used to evaluate arguments and draw valid conclusions based on premises. It operates on the principle that if the premises are true and the reasoning is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. This form of reasoning is foundational in critical thinking because it ensures that conclusions follow directly from the given facts, facilitating clear and rational decision-making.

In the context of the scenario involving trainer and cleaner John, deductive reasoning can be illustrated by examining the premises: John owns a gym with a small staff, few of whom are full-time; Chris, a full-time trainer, also participates in cleaning activities. The inference that can be drawn is that Chris, who actively maintains the cleanliness of the gym, deserves recognition or compensation beyond his role as a trainer. The argument hinges on premises about Chris’s contributions and John’s assumptions about responsibilities. By applying deductive reasoning, it is clear that if Chris indeed performs cleaning, and John assumes he will, then John should acknowledge this contribution comparatively, perhaps with compensation or recognition.

The decision-making process in the example of Mark and Sally purchasing a car further exemplifies deductive reasoning. The premises involve the financial stability of their current car, the considerations of safety, future needs due to pregnancy, and the cost implications of leasing versus buying. Deductive logic guides their decision: if they need a safer car for their expanding family, and buying is more cost-effective long-term, then investing in a new vehicle is a justified conclusion. Conversely, if their current car is sufficient, then purchasing a new car might be unnecessary. Their reasoning process depends on evaluating their premises about safety, costs, and future needs.

Similarly, choosing between buying a home or renting an apartment involves deductive logic. The premises include financial benefits such as tax deductions and potential value appreciation, freedom to customize, privacy, and permanence. If the premises hold true, then buying a home offers advantages over renting, making it a rational decision. On the other hand, if financial constraints outweigh the benefits, then renting might be preferable. Deductive reasoning thereby supports making a decision aligned with factual premises and logical inference.

The debate over public versus private schooling also benefits from deductive reasoning. The premises encompass factors like cost, admission policies, class size, safety, privacy, educational offerings, special education services, and student comfort. Analyzing this set of premises logically leads to the conclusion that the best choice depends on individual circumstances, priorities, and the specific context of each family and student. Deduction helps synthesize these varied factors into an informed decision based on logical evaluation.

The question of cheating versus academic honesty involves deductive reasoning as well. The premises include Jenna’s commitment to honesty, her personal struggles, her friend's advice, and the potential consequences of cheating. The logical conclusion stemming from these premises is that honesty aligns with personal integrity and long-term well-being, whereas cheating, despite its apparent short-term advantages, ultimately damages reputation and self-respect. Deductive reasoning guides Jenna in understanding that adhering to academic integrity is the rational and morally justifiable choice based on her values and long-term consequences.

Overall, deductive reasoning provides a structured approach to evaluating arguments and making decisions across various contexts. By assessing the validity of premises and ensuring that conclusions follow logically, individuals can enhance their critical thinking skills and arrive at well-founded, rational solutions that are consistent with the evidence and principles presented.

References

• Copi, I. M., Cohen, C., & McMahon, K. (2018). Introduction to Logic (14th ed.). Routledge.
• Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective. University of Illinois.
• Huffman, C. (2007). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life. Pearson.
• Norwood, R. (2020). Logic and Critical Thinking. OpenStax.
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
• Ross, W. D. (2000). The Right and the Good. Oxford University Press.
• Siegel, H. (2016). Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. Routledge.
• Sinatra, G. M., & Lombardi, D. (2017). Critical thinking in education: An overview. Journal of Applied Educational Research.
• Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
• Walton, D. (2008). Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press.