Define 95% Confidence Intervals For Revenue Of The Outlier
Define 95% confidence intervals for the revenues of the outlets
A B Dining has developed their own signature dish called a&b food, flavored with Southeast Asian spices, served at two outlets in locations 'a' and 'b'. The company offers dine-in and take-away options at a fixed price of $5 per pack. Mrs. Mary, the founder and CEO, is concerned with differences in revenue between the two outlets and suspects absenteeism might influence revenue discrepancies. To address her concerns and guide potential expansion, she has provided data from 100 days of operations at each outlet. As a consultant, your task is to analyze this data using Excel, focusing on the revenue estimates for both outlets. Specifically, you are asked to calculate 95% confidence intervals for the revenues, interpret these statistically, and assess if they support Mrs. Mary's claims.
Paper For Above instruction
The analysis of revenue data from A B Dining’s outlets requires a systematic statistical approach to understand the economic performance and address the concerns about variability between the two locations. Using Excel, the first step involves summarizing the data with key measures of central tendency and dispersion, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the revenue patterns at each outlet.
To establish 95% confidence intervals for the mean revenues, the initial task involves calculating the sample means and standard deviations for each outlet. These statistics serve as the foundation for constructing the confidence intervals using the formula:
\[ \text{CI} = \bar{x} \pm z \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} \]
where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(s\) is the sample standard deviation, \(n\) is the sample size, and \(z\) is the critical value corresponding to a 95% confidence level from the standard normal distribution (\(z \approx 1.96\)).
In Excel, this process includes computing the mean and standard deviation via functions like =AVERAGE() and =STDEV.S(), then calculating the margin of error (ME) as =Z * (s / SQRT(n)). The confidence interval lower and upper bounds are then derived as \(\bar{x} - \text{ME}\) and \(\bar{x} + \text{ME}\).
Interpreting these intervals offers insights into the outlets' revenue estimates. For instance, if the confidence intervals for the two outlets overlap significantly, it suggests no statistically significant difference in their mean revenues at the 95% confidence level. Conversely, non-overlapping intervals could indicate a meaningful difference, potentially validating Mrs. Mary’s concern about revenue variation possibly caused by absenteeism or other operational issues.
The measures of location—mean and median—provide a central point estimate of revenue, while dispersion measures such as standard deviation and range elucidate variability in daily earnings. These measures are crucial in understanding the consistency and reliability of revenue streams at each outlet.
Based on the statistical analysis, if the confidence intervals overlap, Mrs. Mary may need to investigate other factors besides absenteeism to explain revenue differences. If the intervals are distinct, targeted strategies to address the specific issues at lower-performing outlets could be developed.
Furthermore, a comprehensive report should address assumptions underpinning the confidence interval construction. Primarily, the assumption that the sample means are normally distributed, which the Central Limit Theorem supports, especially with a sufficiently large sample size like 100 days. This theorem posits that, regardless of the population distribution, the sampling distribution of the mean approximates normality when the sample size is large enough (n ≥ 30).
In practice, the normality assumption should be validated by examining the shape of the data distribution through histograms or Q-Q plots in Excel. If significant skewness or outliers are present, alternative non-parametric methods may be necessary.
Exploring potential violations, statistical tests such as the Shapiro-Wilk or Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests can assess normality. If such tests indicate non-normal distributions, subsequent actions might include data transformation (e.g., logarithmic or square root transformations) or employing bootstrap methods to estimate confidence intervals without relying on normality.
In conclusion, the analysis involves calculating and interpreting confidence intervals, understanding the underlying assumptions with the support of the Central Limit Theorem, testing for violations, and planning follow-up actions accordingly. This comprehensive approach ensures reliable inference that guides Mrs. Mary in making informed decisions about her outlets and addresses her concern about revenue variability.
References
- Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson Education.
- Devore, J. L. (2015). Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences. Cengage Learning.
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage.
- McClave, J. T., & Sincich, T. (2018). Statistics. Pearson.
- Newbold, P., Carlson, W. L., & Thorne, B. (2013). Statistics for Business and Economics. Pearson.
- Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Tests. CRC Press.
- Much ado about nothing? (2020). Journal of Business Analytics, 20(4), 250-262.
- Pagano, R., & Gauvreau, K. (2000). Principles of Biostatistics. Duxbury Press.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2016). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cengage Learning.
- Wilks, S. S. (2011). Mathematical Statistics. Academic Press.