Define Primary And Secondary Deviance And Discuss Them
Define primary and secondary deviance and discuss their
In society, the terms primary and secondary deviance are used to explain different ways people experience and react to deviant behavior. Primary deviance refers to minor or first-time behaviors that violate norms but do not affect a person's self-image or social identity significantly. For example, someone might steal candy once out of curiosity or peer pressure. These actions are seen as isolated incidents and are often not labeled or judged harshly by society. On the other hand, secondary deviance happens when a person’s deviant behavior becomes a regular part of their identity because society labels them as deviant. This labeling can cause the individual to accept the deviant identity, leading to a pattern of repeated behavior. For example, if a person gets caught stealing multiple times and society labels them a thief, they might start to see themselves as a deviant or criminal, which can reinforce their behavior.
The relationship between primary and secondary deviance is interconnected and important to understand how deviant behavior develops over time. When someone commits primary deviance, it is often a one-time event and may not have lasting effects on their self-image. However, if society responds with labeling and stigmatization, this can push the individual toward secondary deviance. Once labeled as deviant, the person may begin to act in ways consistent with that label because they are treated differently by others. This process can create a cycle where primary deviance leads to societal reaction, which then results in secondary deviance, further reinforcing the person’s deviant identity. In summary, primary deviance can be seen as the initial act that could lead to more societal responses, which, if negative, might push an individual into secondary deviance. Understanding this connection helps in addressing and preventing persistent deviant behavior and promoting social rehabilitation.
Paper For Above instruction
In society, the terms primary and secondary deviance are used to explain different ways people experience and react to deviant behavior. Primary deviance refers to minor or first-time behaviors that violate norms but do not affect a person's self-image or social identity significantly. For example, someone might steal candy once out of curiosity or peer pressure. These actions are seen as isolated incidents and are often not labeled or judged harshly by society. On the other hand, secondary deviance happens when a person’s deviant behavior becomes a regular part of their identity because society labels them as deviant. This labeling can cause the individual to accept the deviant identity, leading to a pattern of repeated behavior. For example, if a person gets caught stealing multiple times and society labels them a thief, they might start to see themselves as a deviant or criminal, which can reinforce their behavior.
The relationship between primary and secondary deviance is interconnected and important to understand how deviant behavior develops over time. When someone commits primary deviance, it is often a one-time event and may not have lasting effects on their self-image. However, if society responds with labeling and stigmatization, this can push the individual toward secondary deviance. Once labeled as deviant, the person may begin to act in ways consistent with that label because they are treated differently by others. This process can create a cycle where primary deviance leads to societal reaction, which then results in secondary deviance, further reinforcing the person’s deviant identity. In summary, primary deviance can be seen as the initial act that could lead to more societal responses, which, if negative, might push an individual into secondary deviance. Understanding this connection helps in addressing and preventing persistent deviant behavior and promoting social rehabilitation.
References
- Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press.
- Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the study of sociopathic behavior. McGraw-Hill.
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
- Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
- Schur, E. M. (1971). Labeling deviant behavior: Its sociological implications. Harper & Row.
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
- Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. Free Press.
- Howard Becker. (1951). Moral Panics and Deviant Behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 441–454.
- Johnson, B. R. (1978). The role of labeling in the development of deviance. Social Problems, 25(1), 27–39.
- Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363-385.