Defined Benefit And Defined Contribution Plans For Risk Mana

Defined Benefit And Defined Contribution Plans For Risk Management And

What are the primary differences between a defined benefit plan and a defined contribution plan? In a brief essay, include discussion about the following questions: a. Who bears the risk of investment? b. What are the actuarial complexities? c. What is fixed, contributions or benefits? d. Are there separate accounts? e. Is the plan insured? f. Is the plan better for older or for younger employees? For additional details, please refer to the Short Paper/Case Study Rubric document in the Assignment Guidelines and Rubrics section of the course. Needing 2-3 pages APA style and 100% plagiarism free with references cited.

Paper For Above instruction

The landscape of retirement plans has evolved significantly over the past decades, primarily through the development of defined benefit (DB) and defined contribution (DC) plans. Understanding the fundamental distinctions between these two types of plans is essential for employees, employers, and policymakers to make informed decisions regarding retirement savings and risk management. This essay explores the primary differences between DB and DC plans, focusing on risk allocation, actuarial complexities, fixed elements, account structures, insurance considerations, and suitability for different age groups.

A defined benefit plan guarantees a specific retirement benefit amount based on factors such as salary history and years of service. The employer primarily bears the investment risk in DB plans. Since the promised benefits are predetermined, the employer must manage investments to ensure sufficient funds are available upon employee retirement, which entails significant actuarial calculations. Actuaries evaluate variables like mortality rates, salary growth, investment returns, and inflation to determine funding levels necessary to meet future obligations. The benefit is fixed; thus, employees know exactly what they will receive, but contributions can vary over time based on funding requirements. Typically, DB plans do not involve separate accounts for individual employees; instead, they pool assets to support the promised benefits.

In contrast, defined contribution plans specify the amount of contributions made into individual employee accounts, often on a regular basis, but do not guarantee specific benefit amounts. The investment risk shifts to employees, who are responsible for managing their accounts to meet their retirement goals. The plan's structure involves separate accounts for each participant, where contributions are invested in various funds selected by the employee. The final retirement benefit depends on the accumulated value of these accounts, which fluctuates with investment performance. The employer's obligation is limited to making the agreed-upon contributions. Although some DC plans may be insured through government agencies or private insurers, typically, the participant bears the investment risk, and the plan does not have an insurance guarantee akin to that found in DB plans.

The actuarial complexities are notably higher in DB plans due to the need for sophisticated calculations to determine funding levels, account for mortality, and forecast future liabilities. Actuaries must account for demographic variables and market assumptions, making the plan require ongoing actuarial valuation. Conversely, DC plans are administratively simpler, focusing mainly on tracking contributions and investment performance, with less actuarial analysis involved.

When considering what element is fixed—contributions or benefits—DB plans offer fixed benefits, while DC plans fix contributions. The benefit in a DB plan is predetermined, but contributions may vary based on funding needs. In a DC plan, contributions are fixed (or standardized), but the benefits depend on investment returns and accumulated funds.

Regarding insurance, DB plans are often insured through government-backed pension insurance programs, reducing the risk of plan failure for participants. For example, in the United States, the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation (PBGC) provides insurance for covered pension plans, safeguarding benefits up to certain limits. DC plans, however, generally do not have such insurance, leaving participants exposed to investment risks; though some plans may include guarantees for certain features, most depend on the performance of the invested assets.

The suitability of each plan type varies by employee age. DB plans tend to be more advantageous for older employees approaching retirement, as they often provide a defined benefit based on final salary or career average. Younger employees may view these plans as less flexible, especially if funding or plan assumptions change. Conversely, DC plans are typically more attractive to younger employees, offering flexibility, portability, and the opportunity to accumulate wealth over time through individual investments. The progressive nature of DC plans aligns well with modern trends towards personalized retirement savings strategies.

In conclusion, while both defined benefit and defined contribution plans serve as mechanisms for retirement income, they differ fundamentally in risk bearing, actuarial requirements, fixed elements, account structures, insurance features, and suitability for different age groups. Policymakers and employers must carefully consider these aspects when designing retirement benefit programs to ensure financial security for employees across various stages of their careers.

References

• Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2014). Investments (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Merton, R. C. (2013). Continuous-Time Finance. Blackwell Publishing.
• Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). (2022). How Pension Insurance Works. https://www.pbgc.gov/about/how-pension-insurance-works
• Mitchell, O. S., et al. (2018). Social Security and Retirement Incentives. National Bureau of Economic Research.
• OECD. (2020). Pensions Outlook 2020. OECD Publishing.
• Trustees of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund. (2023). Annual Report. U.S. Social Security Administration.
• Clark, R. L., & Postlewaite, A. (2017). Pension Design and Risk-Sharing Mechanisms. Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 16(3), 301-319.
• Erel, I., et al. (2019). Retirement Plan Structures and Employee Outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics, 131(2), 319-337.
• DeFreitas, S., & Rizvi, S. (2020). Comparing Retirement Savings Plans: Risks and Benefits. Australasian Journal of Management, 45(4), 657-680.
• Laibson, D., & Mollerstrom, J. (2018). The Future of Retirement Planning. Annual Review of Economics, 10, 81-107.