Definition Of Critical Thinking: Absolutely No Plagiarism

Definition Of Critical Thinkingabsolutely No Plagarism At All Perfect

The first reading contained the following definition of critical thinking: “According to Critical Thinking as Defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking, 1987 located at Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning or communication, as a guide to belief and action.”

This definition uses words with which you may be unfamiliar. First, write the definitions for the following words: Conceptualizing, Analyzing, Synthesizing. Second, re-write the definition of critical thinking in your own words. If you like, use more than one sentence. Be sure to include citations as needed and write in first person.

Paper For Above instruction

Critical thinking, as defined by the National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking (1987), refers to an intellectually disciplined process characterized by active and skillful engagement with information. This involves several cognitive steps such as conceptualizing, analyzing, synthesizing, applying, and evaluating information to guide beliefs and actions effectively. To fully understand this concept, it is essential to understand the specific words used within the definition.

Conceptualizing involves forming clear, distinct mental models or ideas about a subject. It refers to the ability to grasp the core principles or concepts behind a particular issue or topic, allowing us to see the bigger picture. For example, conceptualizing the effects of climate change involves understanding the underlying scientific principles and broader environmental implications (Facione, 2015).

Analyzing is the process of breaking down complex information into smaller components to understand their structure and relationship. It requires evaluating details, identifying patterns, and recognizing connections. When analyzing a research study, a critical thinker evaluates the methodology, data, and conclusions to determine validity and reliability (Paul & Elder, 2014).

Synthesizing refers to combining various pieces of information, ideas, or data to form a new, coherent whole. It involves integrating insights from different sources or perspectives to develop a comprehensive understanding or innovative solution. For instance, synthesizing research findings from multiple studies can lead to a broader view of a scientific phenomenon (Ennis, 2011).

Rewriting the definition of critical thinking in my own words, I would describe it as a mental process that involves actively and thoughtfully engaging with information. It encompasses the abilities to interpret, analyze, and combine knowledge to make informed judgments and decisions. Critical thinking requires discipline and skill, as it guides us in evaluating evidence and reasoning logically before forming beliefs or taking actions. Ultimately, it helps us navigate complex situations more effectively by applying our reasoning abilities (Facione, 2015).

In conclusion, critical thinking is a vital cognitive skill that involves a series of mental activities—conceptualizing, analyzing, synthesizing—that enable us to process information thoroughly. This disciplined approach supports rational decision-making and enhances our understanding of complex issues, making it an essential competency in academics, professional life, and daily decision-making.

References

  • Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
  • Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Teaching Philosophy, 34(2), 5-24.
  • Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Pearson.