Demonstrate How Effective Team Building Optimizes Implementa
Demonstrate How Effective Team Building Optimizes The Implementation O
Demonstrate how effective team building optimizes the implementation of strategic planning. You are the administrator of a clinic with 50 employees. You have been tasked with facilitating discussion with other health professionals in your clinic to select a new EHR system, make judgments in support of established criteria and/or standards, and help the team decide which will be implemented across the organization. Construct and recommend a plan to build 1-2 effective teams to appraise and assess and select a new EHR system for the clinic. Determine the professional roles that should be represented on your team(s). Your plan must include at least three (3) team/consensus-building methods. Evaluate the concepts of change management theories, techniques, and leadership by assessing typical challenges seen with implementing a new EHR system across an organization. Your evaluation should demonstrate that you have considered how a transition to EHR would result in the need to plan for change management interventions. Provide two (2) examples of challenges arising from EHR adoption and detail the change management theories that you would enact to overcome resistance to change. Recommend implementation of a departmental strategic plan by detailing at least two (2) areas of risk exposure mitigation, organizational or process redesign, training, or communication strategy, as they relate to EHR implementation. Evaluate and interpret the purpose of the procurement process. What are the purposes of the Request for Proposal (RFP), the Request for Information (RFI) and the Request for Quotation (RFQ)? Provide detail for when and how to use each to help a healthcare organization more fully identify its needs and the issues involved with planning for significant projects or purchases.
Paper For Above instruction
Effective team building is fundamental to the successful implementation of strategic initiatives within healthcare organizations, such as selecting and deploying a new Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. Building structured, collaborative, and high-functioning teams facilitates comprehensive evaluation, consensus-building, and smooth transition processes. For a clinic with 50 employees, creating one or two dedicated teams comprising diverse professional roles ensures a balanced approach to assessing EHR options and promotes shared ownership of decisions.
The first step in team construction involves identifying the critical professional roles necessary for an effective evaluation. These roles typically include healthcare providers (physicians, nurses, allied health professionals), IT specialists, compliance officers, administrative staff, and vendor representatives. Each role offers unique insights into the technical, clinical, operational, and regulatory aspects of the EHR system. Inclusion of diverse roles fosters a comprehensive appraisal and diminishes the likelihood of overlooked needs or concerns.
To facilitate consensus among team members, especially when disagreements arise regarding priorities or processes, employing structured team/consensus-building methods is vital. Three effective methods include the nominal group technique (NGT), the Delphi method, and facilitated workshops. The NGT enables anonymous idea generation and prioritization, reducing domination by outspoken members. The Delphi method involves multiple rounds of anonymous feedback, helping the team achieve consensus on complex issues. Facilitated workshops promote open dialogue and collective problem-solving, ensuring diverse perspectives are considered and agreements are reached through moderated discussion.
Change management is critical during EHR implementation due to the significant organizational transition involved. Theories such as Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model and Lewin’s Change Theory provide frameworks to manage resistance and facilitate adoption. These models emphasize preparing stakeholders, communicating vision, empowering action, and consolidating gains.
A notable challenge during EHR adoption is resistance from clinicians accustomed to legacy systems, fearing workflow disruptions or data loss. Applying Kotter’s model, administrators should create a sense of urgency about the benefits of EHR, develop a guiding coalition, and communicate a compelling vision for improved patient care. Training and involvement in system customization foster ownership, reducing resistance.
Another challenge involves insufficient training, leading to decreased productivity and frustration. Using Lewin’s Change Theory—comprising unfreeze, change, and refreeze stages—training programs should be designed to prepare staff (unfreeze), implement comprehensive training sessions (change), and reinforce new workflows through ongoing support (refreeze). This structured approach ensures sustainability and competence in the new system.
Implementing a departmental strategic plan for EHR requires addressing potential risks and redesigning organizational processes. First, risk exposure mitigation can focus on data security, backup protocols, and compliance with patient privacy regulations. Ensuring robust cybersecurity measures and regular audits reduce the risk of data breaches.
Second, organizational or process redesign involves workflow analysis and optimization to align clinical and administrative tasks with the new system. Redesigning processes minimizes duplication, streamlines communication, and enhances efficiency, facilitating adoption.
Effective communication strategies are essential, involving regular updates, feedback mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement sessions. Training plans should include tiered education tailored to different user groups, promoting competence and confidence in using the EHR system.
Understanding procurement processes enhances strategic planning for significant technology purchases. The Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits detailed solutions from vendors, aiming to evaluate capabilities, costs, and compliance. The RFP is used when organizations have clear requirements and seek comprehensive proposals.
The Request for Information (RFI) seeks general information about available solutions, providing insight into market offerings, vendor capabilities, and emerging technologies. It is appropriate during early planning stages when needs are not fully defined.
The Request for Quotation (RFQ) requests specific pricing information for clearly defined products or services. It is employed when the organization has established specifications and is ready to compare costs for final procurement decisions.
Using these procurement tools strategically ensures organizations thoroughly understand their needs, evaluate solutions objectively, and make cost-effective decisions aligned with their strategic goals, thus minimizing the risk of selecting unsuitable systems or vendors.
References
- American Hospital Association. (2019). Clinical workflow redesign in the digital age. AHA Press.
- Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
- Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1(2), 5-41.
- McGinnis, T. & Williams, J. (2020). Strategic management of health information systems. Health Informatics Journal, 26(3), 1234-1245.
- Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (2021). Guide to health IT procurement. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Roberts, K., & Wilson, J. (2018). Change theories and healthcare technology implementation. Journal of Healthcare Management, 63(4), 291-302.
- Shaw, R., & McFadden, K. (2017). Managing resistance to EHR adoption. Journal of Medical Systems, 41(7), 109.
- Smith, A., & Jones, L. (2022). Building high-performing health care teams. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 14, 45-58.
- Thompson, P. (2015). Organizational change strategies for health IT. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15, 10.
- Weston, T., & Buckley, S. (2019). Strategies for effective healthcare procurement. Journal of Health Economics, 68, 251-265.