Department Of English Essay 5 And Practice Exit Examination

Department Of Englishessay 5 And Practiceexit Examination For English

Explain why you do or do not favor the enforcement of a mandatory retirement age so that more job opportunities can be created for young people. Your final examination requires you to compose a five-paragraph persuasive essay (approximately words), responding to the prompt above and demonstrating your efficiency as a college writer at the English 1301 level. An evaluation of your performance by departmental faculty will entail the following expectations: 1.) That your grammar, syntax, punctuation, spelling, and word-choice are reasonably sound. Moreover, you will be expected to follow the instructions of this persuasive prompt exactly as stated. 2.) That you can demonstrate the ability to organize (design) your content in an appealing manner. The introduction of your paper must contain a clear and apt thesis statement as the last sentence of the paragraph. The analytical body of your paper must contain three topical paragraphs, each of which features a uniquely worded and purposeful topic sentence at the beginning of each paragraph. Each topical paragraph must contain ample evidence/ arguments/ examples, supporting the topic sentence. The conclusion of your paper should be written in such a manner as to reconnect the reader’s attention with the controlling idea expressed in the thesis statement. 3.) That you can give reasonable evidence of your ability to think critically as well as creatively about the topic on which you write. Thus, you will be expected to formulate a discussion which compels the reader’s interest and engages in positive ways his (her) intellectual response. 4.) That you are able to formulate an appropriate title for your essay, one that functions as an informative or instructive guide to your reader as to the controlling idea within your paper. Formatting (and other) Instructions and Guidelines : · Use font #12 for the purpose of ease in reading. · Double space your manuscript. · Center your title and capitalize its key words. · Indent your paragraphs, using the Tab key. · All ideas should be completely your own . · Do not use the word “you” in writing the essay. · You may make use of spelling and grammar checking tools available to you. · You may use a dictionary and/or a thesaurus during the exam. · You may not bring into the examination area any previously written materials. · You may not access the Internet for any reason. · You have only one hour and twenty minutes to complete your final, including time for editing. · Save your essay to the desktop (as a .docx document) while writing. · Upload your paper to eCampus to the Essay 5 draft link under DB. Milestone Dates for Essay 5: Thursday, 30 April: Review essay 5 / practice final assignment. Tuesday, 5 May: Post E5 thesis to DB labeled for this purpose by 6:00 p.m. Tuesday, 5 May: Provide feedback to at least 3 peers by 11:59 tonight. Be sure to use the PRG questions!! Thursday, 7 May : Post essay 5 draft to DB by 6:00 p.m. Thursday, 7 May: PRG on 3 peers’ drafts by 11:59 p.m. Be sure to use the PRG form and provide a marked up draft back to the writer! Tuesday, 12 May: Essay 5 final draft due to TurnItIn.com by 11:59 p.m. The link will disappear at the deadline, as this is the last class day, and late work will not be evaluated. Final exam: Tuesday, 5 May. Your final, which will look like this one, but will be on a different topic, must be completed with your approved proctor and submitted no later than 7:30 p.m. Please note that this document is NOT the final exam! Late posts will not be evaluated, which will lead to retaking the course. Please do not push the deadline!

Paper For Above instruction

Mandatory retirement age policies have long been debated in various societies, often viewed through the lens of economic opportunity and fairness. Advocates argue that enforcing a mandatory retirement age can open up employment opportunities for younger individuals, potentially boosting economic growth and reducing unemployment rates among the youth. Opponents, however, contend that such policies can be discriminatory, ageist, and detrimental to experienced workers. This essay will examine both perspectives and argue that, while the intention behind enforcing a retirement age may be to foster employment for young workers, the broader social and economic implications suggest that mandatory retirement policies are often unjust and counterproductive.

Introduction

The debate over whether to enforce a mandatory retirement age centers on balancing economic benefits with fairness and individual rights. Proponents believe such policies can create a more dynamic workforce by making room for younger employees, thereby reducing unemployment among youth. Conversely, critics argue that age should not be a basis for employment termination, as it discriminates against experienced workers and ignores the valuable contributions they make. This essay will explore both sides of the argument before presenting a reasoned conclusion against the enforcement of a mandatory retirement age.

Supporting the Enforcement of a Mandatory Retirement Age

Supporters of mandatory retirement age policies claim they are instrumental in promoting fresh talent within the workforce. As senior employees retire, they open up positions that can be filled by younger workers eager to enter the job market. This approach is thought to facilitate a more youthful, innovative, and adaptable workforce, which is crucial in rapidly changing industries such as technology and manufacturing. Moreover, proponents argue that enforced retirement can help prevent burnout among older employees, ensuring productivity and job satisfaction for all staff members. For example, in industries where physical stamina is essential, retirement policies can be viewed as necessary to maintain safety standards and operational efficiency.

Arguments Against Mandatory Retirement Age Policies

However, opponents highlight several critical drawbacks of enforcing a retirement age. First, such policies constitute age discrimination, violating principles of equal employment rights and fairness. Ageism can anchor older workers to stereotypes that they are less productive, a notion increasingly challenged by research demonstrating the value of experience and wisdom in the workplace (Posthuma & Campion, 2009). Second, many workers wish to continue their careers beyond traditional retirement ages, motivated by financial necessity, personal fulfillment, or a desire to contribute meaningfully. Disregarding these factors can damage morale and violate individual rights to employment. For example, in countries like Germany and Japan, flexible retirement policies acknowledge the importance of retaining experienced workers, balancing workforce needs with individual preferences (OECD, 2019).

Economic and Social Implications

Enforcing a mandatory retirement age may temporarily benefit some industries by opening up vacancies, but it neglects the long-term economic and social costs. Older workers often possess valuable skills, institutional knowledge, and mentorship capabilities that are irreplaceable. Forcing retirement can result in a loss of expertise and decreased productivity, potentially costing organizations and economies dearly. Additionally, such policies can exacerbate age-related inequalities, marginalizing older adults and impairing social cohesion. A more effective approach involves implementing age-friendly workplace policies that encourage voluntary retirement while promoting lifelong learning and skill development for workers of all ages (Walker et al., 2020).

Conclusion

While the idea of enforcing a mandatory retirement age aims to create more opportunities for the youth and foster economic vitality, its broader implications raise significant concerns about fairness, productivity, and social justice. Forced retirement disregards individual rights and undervalues the contributions of experienced older workers. Instead, policies fostering flexible retirement options, continuous learning, and age diversity are more equitable and sustainable. Society benefits more from valuing the skills and experience of all workers, regardless of age, than from rigid age-based restrictions. Therefore, the enforcement of a mandatory retirement age is generally unjust and counterproductive in the pursuit of a fair and dynamic workforce.

References

  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158-181.
  • OECD. (2019). Ageing and employment policies: работников зрелого возраста. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Walker, A., Maltby, T., & Haslam, C. (2020). Age-friendly working practices: A review of evidence. Ageing & Society, 40(9), 1884-1906.
  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158-181.
  • OECD. (2019). Ageing and employment policies: workers of mature age. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Walker, A., Maltby, T., & Haslam, C. (2020). Age-friendly working practices: A review of evidence. Ageing & Society, 40(9), 1884-1906.
  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158-181.
  • OECD. (2019). Ageing and employment policies: workers of mature age. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  • Walker, A., Maltby, T., & Haslam, C. (2020). Age-friendly working practices: A review of evidence. Ageing & Society, 40(9), 1884-1906.
  • Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158-181.