Describe ES1 120 Refusal To Participate In Harmful Action

Describe Es1 120 Refusal To Participate In The Harmful Action To

1. Describe ES1-120: (Refusal to Participate in the Harmful Action to Clients) What are the harmful actions to clients (“Do No Harm”)? Do you agree/disagree with the AACC Code of Ethics? What is distinctive about the AACC Code of Ethics?

2. Describe ES1-140: (Dual and Multiple Relationships). What is it? Why are dual and multiple relationships harmful to clients? Do you agree/disagree with the AACC Code of Ethics? Write down all the rules and regulations concerning ES1-140.

3. Describe ES1-300: (Consent in Christian Counseling) and ES1-320: (Consent for the Structure and Process of Counseling). Write the many categories of the consents in the Code of Ethics. What is the one thing you can overlook? Explain. Why is securing consent so important for clients?

4. Describe ES1-430: (The Rule of Mandatory Disclosure). What is Mandated Reporting? Do you agree/disagree with the AACC Code of Ethics? When do you break the confidentiality, if any? Or do you ever?

5. Describe ES1-520, 530: (Cultural Competency & Working with Persons of Different Faith). Write a definition of cultural competency based on the AACC Code of Ethics. Do you agree/disagree with Code 1-530? Write your view on this matter. How do you work with persons of different faith, religions, and values?

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of Christian counseling, ethical standards serve as guiding principles that uphold the integrity and professionalism of practitioners while safeguarding the well-being of clients. The American Association of Christian Counselors (AACC) has delineated specific codes of ethics that address various aspects of counselor conduct, including refusal to participate in harmful actions, handling dual relationships, securing informed consent, mandatory disclosures, and cultural competency. Analyzing these codes provides insight into best practices that foster ethical, respectful, and effective counseling relationships.

ES1-120: Refusal to Participate in the Harmful Action to Clients

ES1-120 emphasizes the counselor's obligation to refuse participation in any action that could harm clients, encapsulating the principle of "Do No Harm." Harmful actions may include exploiting clients, engaging in sexual misconduct, or ignoring client confidentiality, all of which violate fundamental ethical standards and compromise client welfare. This principle calls counselors to maintain a boundary that prevents any engagement in behaviors that could damage clients psychologically, emotionally, or spiritually. I strongly agree with the AACC Code of Ethics' stance on this matter, as it prioritizes client safety and integrity. What distinguishes the AACC's ethical framework is its integration of biblical principles with professional standards, emphasizing a moral obligation rooted in Christian values to protect vulnerable individuals.

ES1-140: Dual and Multiple Relationships

Dual and multiple relationships occur when counselors engage in more than one type of relationship with a client—such as personal, professional, social, or financial—simultaneously. These interconnected roles can impair counselor objectivity, foster conflicts of interest, and potentially exploit clients. Such relationships are harmful because they can blur boundaries, diminish professional judgment, and lead to favoritism or exploitation, thereby undermining the client's trust and safety. I agree with the ethical stance of the AACC, which strictly prohibits dual relationships that could impair objectivity or exploit clients. The rules and regulations concerning ES1-140 include avoiding relationships that could impair professional judgment, refraining from favoritism, and maintaining clear boundaries. These guidelines serve to create a safe, transparent, and ethical counseling environment.

ES1-300 & ES1-320: Consent in Counseling

In Christian counseling, obtaining informed consent across various categories—such as confidentiality, scope of practice, potential risks, and limitations—is crucial. ES1-300 and ES1-320 specify that clients must be fully aware of the counseling process, especially regarding Christian aspects and therapeutic boundaries. A category that might be overlooked is the ongoing consent process, wherein clients should continuously agree to the direction of therapy. Securing consent reinforces respect for the client's autonomy, fosters trust, and ensures transparency. It is vital because it empowers clients to make informed decisions about their participation and helps prevent misunderstandings or feelings of coercion. Therefore, obtaining comprehensive and ongoing consent is foundational to ethical practice.

ES1-430: The Rule of Mandatory Disclosure & Mandated Reporting

ES1-430 highlights the counselor's obligation for mandatory disclosure under specific legal and ethical circumstances, primarily in cases of mandated reporting. Mandated reporting involves disclosing information about suspected abuse, neglect, or harm to minors, elders, or at-risk populations as required by law. I agree with the AACC's stance on mandated reporting, as safeguarding vulnerable populations aligns with biblical compassion and justice. However, confidentiality must be maintained unless there is a significant risk or legal obligation to disclose. I believe that confidentiality should be broken only when it is ethically and legally mandated—for instance, when there is imminent harm to the client or others. Counselors must balance confidentiality with protective responsibilities, ensuring transparency and respecting client dignity.

ES1-520 & ES1-530: Cultural Competency & Working Across Faiths

Cultural competency, as defined by the AACC Code of Ethics, involves a counselor's ability to understand, respect, and appropriately respond to clients' diverse cultural backgrounds, beliefs, and values. This competence is essential in acknowledging that faith, ethnicity, and personal identity influence clients' worldviews and healing processes. I agree with Code 1-530, which emphasizes respect for different faiths and spiritual traditions, promoting a nonjudgmental and inclusive approach. Working with individuals from varied religious backgrounds requires sensitivity, humility, and a willingness to learn. Counselors should avoid imposing their beliefs, instead fostering an environment of respect and understanding. Recognizing and honoring client diversity enhances therapeutic rapport and promotes holistic healing rooted in cultural and spiritual respect.

References

• American Counseling Association. (2014). ACA Code of Ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
• American Association of Christian Counselors. (2017). AACC Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice. Orlando, FL.
• Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2015). Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions. Cengage Learning.
• Knapp, S., & VandeCreek, L. (2012). Practical Ethics for Psychologists: A Positive Approach. American Psychological Association.
• Remley, T. P., & Herlihy, B. (2016). Ethical, Legal, and Professional Issues in Counseling. Pearson.
• Singh, G. (2012). Culture in Psychotherapy. Routledge.
• Gerdes, P., et al. (2017). Interviewing and Counseling Strategies. Oxford University Press.
• Sweeney, T. J., & Strauss, M. (2017). Ethical and Legal Issues in Counseling. Pearson.
• Thompson, K. (2018). Multicultural Competence in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Routledge.
• Williams, M. T. (2020). Faith and Counseling: A Guide for Professionals. Routledge.