Describe The Different Types Of Leadership And Management

Describe the different types of leadership, management, and group interactions portrayed

Dear Tutor, please assist me with the following: View the video clip below from the movie Hoosiers @ ( opens in new tab, runs 2:26). Describe the different types of leadership, management, and group interactions portrayed. Consider leadership styles, traits, and alternative approaches for the new coach, the assistant coach, and the players that left the practice. 1. Provide an initial response of 150 words on Tuesday and 2 other student reply responses of 120 words each by Sunday for a maximum score of 1.5 points for each of the entries. 2. Use formal writing. Errors will reduce your grade. 3. Grading will only consider content relating to management concepts (in textbook) 4. Respond by extending the discussion by adding new insights, different examples from your experience, or from other sources. 5. Apply critical thinking. Agreement, quoting other learners, or repeating the case content will count as zero words and zero points. Best, KDR

Paper For Above instruction

The video clip from the movie Hoosiers provides a rich context to analyze various leadership styles, management techniques, and group dynamics portrayed in a sports team setting. The interactions among the new coach, assistant coach, and players highlight different leadership approaches that influence team cohesion, motivation, and overall performance.

Initially, the new coach exemplifies a transformational leadership style, characterized by inspiring and motivating players to achieve their best. His emphasis on discipline, hard work, and team unity aligns with traits associated with transformational leaders, such as charisma, vision, and integrity (Bass & Avolio, 1994). The coach’s approach encourages players to develop their potential and fosters an environment where values like dedication and perseverance are prioritized. Alternatively, a more authoritative style could be considered, focusing on strict rules and hierarchical command, which might be effective in establishing discipline but could risk diminishing player autonomy and intrinsic motivation.

The assistant coach’s interactions reflect a supportive management approach, providing guidance and encouragement to players. This aligns with a democratic leadership style, where participative decision-making enhances team engagement and responsibility (Lewin, Lippitt, & White, 1939). His role demonstrates effective management by balancing directive oversight with supportive communication, thus fostering trust and collaboration among team members. An alternative approach might involve a more authoritarian style, which could streamline decision-making but potentially undermine the inclusive team atmosphere.

The group interactions among players, especially those who left the practice, reveal dynamics of conformity, peer influence, and resistance. The players’ decisions to leave may be driven by individual traits such as hesitancy or conflicts with management styles, or by group cohesion factors like peer pressure. Effective leadership in such contexts involves not only directing but also understanding and managing group influences, promoting a shared sense of purpose. Transformational leadership can be particularly effective here, as it appeals to players’ intrinsic motivation and fosters a collective identity (House & Podsakoff, 1994).

In contemplating alternative approaches for the coach and players, a situational leadership model offers flexibility—adapting leadership styles based on specific team needs and individual traits. For example, adopting a coaching style that is more directive during high-pressure moments and more participative during team-building phases can optimize team performance (Hersey & Blanchard, 1969). Additionally, emphasizing emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills can enhance the coach’s ability to connect with players, manage group dynamics, and drive motivation (Goleman, 1995).

In conclusion, the scene from Hoosiers exemplifies various leadership and management styles in a sports context. Effective leaders exhibit adaptive traits, employ appropriate management techniques, and foster a positive group climate. Recognizing and integrating these management concepts from the textbook into coaching practices can significantly improve team outcomes and individual development.

References

• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
• Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.
• Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice-Hall.
• House, R. J., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1994). Transformational leadership in organizational settings. In Leadership in organizations (pp. 107–142). Jossey-Bass.
• Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in children. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 269-299.