Describe The Three Forms Of Underwriting

Describe In Detail The Three Forms Of Underwriting

1) Describe (in detail) the three forms of underwriting.

The three primary forms of underwriting are firm commitment underwriting, best efforts underwriting, and all-or-none underwriting. Each type varies in the level of risk assumed by underwriters and the contractual obligations involved.

Firm Commitment Underwriting: In this form, the underwriter guarantees the sale of the entire issue by committing to purchase all the securities from the issuer and resell them to the public. The underwriter bears the risk of not being able to sell the securities at the offering price. This method provides certainty to the issuer that all securities will be sold, typically in exchange for a higher fee or underwriting spread. It is commonly used in initial public offerings (IPOs) and large offerings where issuer certainty is prioritized.

Best Efforts Underwriting: Here, the underwriter agrees to use their best efforts to sell as many securities as possible at the agreed-upon offering price but does not guarantee the sale of the entire issue. The risk remains with the issuer if some securities are not sold. This approach is often used for small or riskier offerings where the issuer prefers to retain some control and avoid guaranteed sales commitments. The underwriter earns a commission based on the number of securities sold.

All-or-None Underwriting: This type guarantees that the entire issue will be sold; if not, the offering is canceled. The underwriter does not retain any risk once the entire issue is sold; if the entire securities cannot be sold, no deal is completed. This form is used when the issuer wants to ensure the offering is fully subscribed, often in limited or niche markets.

Paper For Above instruction

In the realm of securities issuance, underwriting plays a critical role in facilitating the transition of financial assets from issuers to investors. The three primary forms of underwriting—firm commitment, best efforts, and all-or-none—each serve different needs and risk profiles for both issuers and underwriters.

Firm Commitment Underwriting is characterized by the underwriter’s obligation to purchase and resell the entire issue at a predetermined price. This method is advantageous for issuers because it guarantees the proceeds regardless of market reception. The underwriter assumes significant risk, especially if market conditions deteriorate post-commitment. This approach is prevalent during IPOs when the issuer seeks certainty and is often associated with higher underwriting fees to compensate for the risk undertaken. The firm commitment effectively transfers the risk of unsold securities from the issuer to the underwriter, providing a hedge against market volatility.

Best Efforts Underwriting differs by where the risk lies. The underwriter acts merely as a sales agent without a commitment to buy the entire issue. Instead, the underwriter pledges to make their best efforts to sell the shares at the offering price. If sales fall short, the issuer bears the risk of unissued securities. This approach is common in more uncertain or smaller offerings where the issuer prefers to retain some control over the transaction. The underwriter's compensation is typically a commission on the securities sold, making this arrangement less risky for the underwriter but potentially less lucrative than firm commitment underwriting.

All-or-None Underwriting emphasizes completeness of the transaction. The underwriter commits to selling the entire securities issue; if not, the deal is canceled, and no securities are issued. This form protects issuers from partial sales and ensures full subscription before proceeding. It is suited for niche markets or specialty offerings where investors demand certainty of complete issuance. Since there is no risk of partial success, the underwriter’s role is limited to marketing with the expectation that the full issue will be delivered, thus minimizing their risk exposure.

Each of these underwriting forms reflects different risk appetites and market conditions. Firm commitment provides certainty to the issuer but transfers risk to the underwriter. Best efforts minimizes risk for the underwriter but leaves some uncertainty for the issuer. All-or-none ensures full subscription but relies heavily on successful marketing. Choosing among them depends on issuer preferences, market conditions, and the type of securities being issued.

References

• Boatwright, J. (2017). Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Ehrhardt, M. C., & Brigham, E. F. (2018). Corporate Finance: A Focused Approach. Cengage Learning.
• Fabozzi, F. J. (2016). Bond Markets, Analysis, and Strategies. Pearson.
• Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2018). Principles of Managerial Finance. Pearson.
• Miller, R. L., & Bahnson, P. R. (2019). Financial Markets and Institutions. Cengage Learning.
• Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Damodaran, A. (2015). Applied Corporate Finance. Wiley.
• Flyod, B. (2018). Underwriting in Public Offerings. Journal of Investment Banking.
• Lee, G. (2020). The Mechanics of Underwriting. Financial Industry Review.
• Schwartz, M. (2019). Market Mechanics and Underwriting. International Journal of Finance & Economics.