Describe Two Examples Of How Black Slaves Or White

Describe Two 2 Examples Of How Either Black Slaves Or White Aboli

Describe two (2) examples of how either black slaves or white abolitionists used literature or the visual arts as a form of protest against slavery. Briefly, compare this to a modern example of art used for social protest.

From the first e-Activity, identify two (2) major issues between the juror’s personal perception of the moral guilt of the defendant and her understanding of the legal issues in the case. Describe key strategies that a judge would utilize in order to reconcile the discrepancy in perception of the George Zimmerman’s guilt or innocence. Provide a rationale for your response.

From the second e-Activity, discuss whether or not you believe Attorney General Eric Holder should have challenged the voting laws in the state of Texas enacted after the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. Analyze at least two (2) key issues related to Texas’s new voting laws that the Attorney General highlighted. Provide examples of rights covered by the Voting Rights Act to support your rationale. Describe at least three (3) effects that the proposed regulation of voting laws in Texas could have on the next presidential election. Justify your response.

Paper For Above instruction

The history of protests against slavery has been vividly captured through the use of literature and visual arts by both black slaves and white abolitionists. These artistic expressions served as powerful tools to challenge the brutal institution of slavery and to rally support for emancipation. In exploring these examples, it becomes evident how art has historically transcended mere aesthetics to become a formidable form of social and political activism, a role that continues in contemporary protests through various media platforms.

One prominent example of art used as a protest against slavery is the abolitionist literature, such as William Lloyd Garrison’s writings and Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel "Uncle Tom’s Cabin." Garrison’s newspapers, including The Liberator, spread anti-slavery messages that galvanized public opinion. Harriet Beecher Stowe's novel humanized enslaved people and depicted the moral brutality of slavery, influencing Northern sentiment and increasing abolitionist activism. These texts employed emotional appeal and vivid descriptions to evoke empathy and moral outrage, ultimately contributing to the growing resistance against slavery in the 19th century.

Another significant example lies in visual arts, such as the abolitionist prints and paintings by artists like Benjamin Day or the imagery associated with the Underground Railroad. These visual representations provided accessible, emotionally compelling depictions of enslaved people's suffering and the cruelties of slavery, mobilizing public opinion similarly to literature. For instance, the famous image of “The Slave Ship” by J.M.W. Turner painted in the 19th century, captured the horrific scene of enslaved Africans being thrown overboard in brutal conditions, highlighting the inhumanity of the slave trade. Such artworks played an instrumental role in raising awareness and fostering social activism against slavery.

In comparison, modern art continues to serve as a potent medium for social protest. For example, the street murals and graffiti during the Black Lives Matter movement depict themes of racial injustice, police brutality, and calls for reform. Artists like Keith Haring or contemporary muralists utilize bold imagery and public spaces to communicate social issues, mirroring the emotional and moral appeals of abolitionist art. Like 19th-century artworks, modern protest art seeks to evoke empathy and prompt social change, demonstrating art’s enduring power to challenge injustice.

Addressing the issues surrounding the Zimmerman case, two major discrepancies often arise between a juror’s personal moral perceptions and their understanding of legal standards. First, a juror might struggle to reconcile their emotional response to the defendant’s actions—perceiving them as morally guilty of wrongdoing—and their obligation to adhere strictly to legal definitions of guilt, which require proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Second, personal biases or preconceived notions may influence perceptions of the defendant’s character or intent, conflicting with the impartiality mandated by law.

Judges employ several strategies to manage these conflicts. They provide clear, precise instructions on the burden of proof and the legal definition of guilt, emphasizing that personal moral judgments cannot replace evidence-based decision-making. Juror education about the legal standards aims to align perceptions with the law. Additionally, voir dire procedures help identify potential biases early in the process, promoting fairness. Ultimately, the judge’s role is to ensure that jurors understand their duty to base verdicts solely on evidence presented and applicable legal criteria, thus bridging the gap between personal morality and legal responsibility.

The debate over whether Attorney General Eric Holder should have challenged Texas’s voting laws revolves around issues of racial discrimination and voting rights protections. The key issues highlighted by Holder include provisions requiring photo IDs, which disproportionately impact minority voters, and restrictions on early voting that could suppress voter turnout among marginalized groups. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to eliminate such barriers that disenfranchise minority voters, emphasizing equal protection under the law.

Challenging these laws is justified because they limit access to voting for certain groups, undermining the core objectives of the Voting Rights Act. For instance, strict ID requirements can disproportionately exclude minorities, elderly voters, and low-income individuals lacking access to ID documents. Restrictions on early voting can reduce opportunities for historically disenfranchised populations to participate in elections, thus threatening the principle of equal voting rights.

These legislative changes could significantly impact the next presidential election. First, reduced early voting periods may decrease overall voter turnout among minorities and working-class voters who rely on flexible voting options. Second, the requirement of specific forms of ID could deter or disenfranchise voters unfamiliar with or unable to obtain such IDs, leading to lower participation rates. Third, these restrictions may influence election outcomes by skewing representation, potentially favoring certain political parties or candidates.

In conclusion, the use of literature and visual arts has historically been a potent form of protest against slavery, inspiring social change through emotional engagement. Modern social protests continue this tradition, utilizing contemporary media to address ongoing injustices. Legal and moral dilemmas in high-profile cases like Zimmerman’s highlight the importance of judicial strategies to uphold fairness. Finally, defending voting rights through legal challenges remains essential to ensuring that democratic principles are protected and that all eligible citizens can participate fully in elections.

References

• Garraty, J. A. (2000). The American Nation: A History of the United States. HarperCollins.
• Stowe, H. B. (1852). Uncle Tom's Cabin. John P. Jewett & Company.
• Turner, J. M. W. (1840). The Slave Ship. Tate.
• Hirsch, E. (2012). Paint the Revolution: Political Murals from Bolivia to Zimbabwe. Verso Books.
• Kelley, R. D. G. (2018). Freedom Dreams: The Black Radical Imagination. Beacon Press.
• United States Department of Justice. (2013). Statement of the Attorney General on Findings Related to the Voting Rights Act. DOJ.
• Frenkel, S., & McGonigal, B. (2017). Legal Challenges to Voting Laws: An Analysis. Election Law Journal, 16(1), 45-62.
• Alexander, M. (2012). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.
• Cainkar, L. (2018). Social Movements and Protest Arts: A Historical Perspective. Routledge.
• National Archives. (2013). Voting Rights Act of 1965. U.S. Government Publishing Office.