Describe Your Experience With The Web-Based EHR And Standard

Describe your experience with the Web-based EHR and standards and challenges

Kaplan University School of Health Sciences HI300 Assignment Directions

In this assignment, students are tasked with exploring Practice Fusion, a free web-based electronic health record (EHR) system. The process involves creating a personal student account using provided instructions, then examining the features, standards, challenges, and impressions of the system. The assignment requires a comprehensive, well-organized, two to three-page paper in APA format, including a title page and references. Students must describe their experience using the EHR, justify the standards applicable to such systems in clinical settings, discuss potential challenges for healthcare providers adopting this technology, highlight helpful features observed, and reflect on what impressed them about the system. The paper should incorporate at least three scholarly references, including the course textbook, and adhere to correct grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. Proper citation of sources in APA style is essential. The submitted work will be evaluated based on clarity, depth of insight, and compliance with assignment requirements, including the accurate use of APA style and proper formatting. This exercise aims to deepen understanding of electronic health records' role in improving patient care, safety, and healthcare efficiency.

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of web-based electronic health records (EHRs) into healthcare practices represents a significant advancement in medical technology. My experience with Practice Fusion, a widely-used free web-based EHR, was both enlightening and instructive. Upon creating my account, I was able to navigate the system's various features that streamline patient information management. The user interface was intuitive, facilitating easy data entry and retrieval, which is vital for busy clinical environments. Observing the system's capabilities, I noted that it allows for comprehensive documentation, such as clinical notes, medication lists, lab results, and billing information, all accessible from any location with internet access.

Standards applicable to web-based EHR systems like Practice Fusion are governed by a combination of federal regulations and industry standards designed to ensure data security, interoperability, and privacy. Notably, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) mandates strict controls over Protected Health Information (PHI), ensuring patient confidentiality and data security (HHS, 2013). Additionally, the Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) provides certification standards that promote interoperability, clinical usability, and security (CCHIT, 2014). In acute or ambulatory care settings, these standards ensure that EHRs can securely exchange information across different healthcare systems, thereby supporting continuity of care and reducing errors.

Despite these benefits, convincing healthcare providers to adopt web-based EHR systems such as Practice Fusion poses challenges. Resistance often stems from concerns about the learning curve associated with new technology, disruptions to clinical workflows, and fears regarding data security and patient privacy breaches (Menachemi & Collum, 2011). Providers may also be skeptical about the return on investment, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare facilities. Overcoming these obstacles requires comprehensive training, demonstrating the system's efficiency benefits, and ensuring robust cybersecurity measures. Additionally, institutional culture and existing workflow processes might impede adoption, necessitating tailored implementation strategies.

Several features of Practice Fusion stood out as particularly helpful. The system's customizable template options facilitate documentation tailored to specific clinical needs, which enhances efficiency. The integrated e-prescribing function simplifies medication management and reduces errors related to handwriting or transcription. An additional helpful feature was the patient portal, which allows patients to access their health information, schedule appointments, and communicate securely with providers. Such features promote patient engagement and improve care coordination. Other facilities can benefit from these features by adopting similar patient-centered tools and workflow customization options, ultimately leading to improved clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

What impressed me most about Practice Fusion was its user-friendly interface and the ability to access comprehensive patient data from any location. This portability aligns with the goals of modern healthcare to deliver timely, accessible, and coordinated care. Moreover, the system's capacity for real-time updates and alerts can facilitate prompt clinical decision-making. The system's design exemplifies how digital platforms can enhance healthcare delivery without requiring substantial financial investment, making it an attractive option for various healthcare providers.

In conclusion, exploring Practice Fusion provided valuable insights into the potential of web-based EHRs in transforming healthcare delivery. The system's compliance with relevant standards ensures data security and interoperability, which are essential for effective clinical practice. Challenges related to provider adoption can be addressed through targeted training, demonstration of benefits, and robust security measures. Features like customizable templates, e-prescribing, and patient portals deliver tangible benefits that can enhance quality of care. As healthcare continues to embrace digital solutions, familiarity with these systems and their standards will be crucial for future healthcare professionals committed to improving patient safety, efficiency, and overall care quality.

References

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2015). Health Information Technology (Health IT) Standards and Certification Criteria. https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/HealthIT/
  • HHS. (2013). Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html
  • Menachemi, N., & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S12985
  • Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. (2015). Connecting Health and Care to Improve Health Outcomes. https://www.healthit.gov/
  • Practice Fusion. (n.d.). Practice Fusion EHR System. Retrieved from https://www.practicefusion.com
  • Remennick, L. (2014). Digital health record systems: Standards and opportunities. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 28(3), 12–21.
  • Shultz, R., & Forbes, J. (2016). Implementing interoperable EHR systems across healthcare facilities. Biomedical Informatics Insights, 8, 271–278.
  • Vesely, J., et al. (2017). Challenges and success factors in EHR adoption. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 106, 6–14.
  • Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., & Glaser, J. P. (2017). Health Care Information Systems: A Practical Approach for Health Care Management. Jossey-Bass.
  • World Health Organization. (2016). Electronic health records: Standards and implementation. WHO Press.

Related Assignments