Description: Imagine That You Are Submitting An Application

Descriptionimagine That You Are Submitting An Application For 100 Mi

Imagine that you are submitting an application for $100 million dollars to address a specific global health issue. The grant application requires that you outline your global health philosophy; identify and justify the global health priority you will focus on a detailed discussion of your proposed intervention; and a discussion on metrics and evaluation. You must also outline how you will spend the $100 million dollars on each of these aspects with a justification of how that money will benefit the program. For each section, make sure to provide at least two unique citations to justify your arguments and proposal. These citations may be from class or external sources.

Please make sure to properly cite all of your sources both in-text (identifying any direct quotations or sources of the information) as well as in a bibliography at the end. The final bibliography should be cited in APA format. If you have questions about the APA format please consult Please use this template to provide your responses as the rubric is based on this format and allows us to find the information in the appropriate sections.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Securing $100 million for a global health initiative necessitates a well-founded philosophy that guides the intervention's core purpose, priorities, and strategies. As an advocate for equitable health access, my foundational global health philosophy emphasizes the importance of addressing social determinants of health, fostering community engagement, and ensuring sustainability. This perspective aligns with the principles of health equity articulated by Whitehead (1992), who emphasizes that health disparities must be systematically targeted through policies and programs rooted in social justice. Furthermore, the World Health Organization (WHO, 2010) underscores the importance of multisectoral approaches that involve stakeholders at all levels, reinforcing the need for comprehensive planning and inclusive participation to effectively tackle complex health issues.

Global Health Priority and Intervention

The global health priority I propose to address is maternal and child health (MCH), specifically focusing on reducing maternal mortality and improving neonatal outcomes in low-resource settings. This priority is vital due to the persistent disparities and high mortality rates experienced by women and children in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of South Asia (World Bank, 2022). Justification for this focus stems from epidemiological data showing that over 90% of maternal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, often preventable with adequate interventions (Say et al., 2014). The core intervention plan includes deploying community health workers, strengthening healthcare infrastructure, and providing culturally tailored health education to empower women and ensure access to skilled birth attendants (Campbell et al., 2016). These strategies are evidence-based, fostering sustainable improvements in maternal and neonatal health outcomes, which directly contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Metrics and Evaluation

Robust metrics are essential to monitor progress, measure effectiveness, and inform continuous improvement efforts. Key indicators will include maternal mortality ratio (MMR), neonatal mortality rate (NMR), skilled birth attendance, and antenatal care coverage. Data collection will involve facility-based records, household surveys, and digital health platforms to ensure real-time tracking and transparency. Evaluation will employ a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of outcomes with qualitative assessments of community engagement and health system responsiveness. This comprehensive evaluation strategy aligns with best practices advocated by the Global Fund (2018), emphasizing iterative feedback loops that facilitate adaptive management and accountability.

Budget Allocation and Justification

The $100 million investment will be allocated across four core components: 1) Capacity building and training of healthcare providers ($25 million), 2) Infrastructure development including clinics and supply chains ($30 million), 3) Community engagement and health education campaigns ($15 million), 4) Monitoring, evaluation, and data systems ($20 million), and 5) Contingency funds and administrative costs ($10 million). The largest portion, infrastructure development, ensures that health services are accessible and sustainable. Investment in training enhances workforce quality and retention, crucial for long-term health improvements (Lewin et al., 2017). Community interventions foster local ownership, increasing program relevance and effectiveness, thus ultimately translating investment into tangible health outcomes (Yamin et al., 2013). Continuous monitoring ensures optimal resource utilization and program adjustments in response to evolving needs.

Conclusion

Allocating $100 million for a global health intervention requires a strategic blend of culturally competent intervention design, precise metrics, and efficient resource distribution. Grounded in the principles of health equity and community participation, the proposed intervention targeting maternal and child health aims for sustainable, measurable improvements, with transparent use of funds to maximize impact. This comprehensive approach aligns with global best practices and paves the way for significant reductions in maternal and neonatal mortality, contributing toward healthier, more equitable societies worldwide.

References

• Campbell, O. M., Graham, W. J., & WHO Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. (2016). Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: Getting on with what works. The Lancet, 388(10056), 327–344.
• Global Fund. (2018). Monitoring and Evaluation Toolkit. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
• Lewin, S., Bosch-Capblanch, X., & Dovey, S. (2017). Facilitators and barriers to community health worker programmes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8).
• Say, L., Chou, D., et al. (2014). Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2(6), e323–e333.
• Whitehead, M. (1992). The concepts and principles of health equity. Health Promotion International, 7(3), 217–228.
• World Bank. (2022). World Development Indicators. Maternal health data.
• World Health Organization. (2010). Guidelines on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. WHO Press.
• Yamin, A. E., et al. (2013). Moving towards a human rights-based approach for health. World Development, 46, 1–13.