Description Of Deliverables: My Objectives Already Turned In

Description of deliverables: My Objectives already turned in an APPROVED by instructor

In my capstone project, I will: 1. evaluate the challenges and effects of diversity in researched small U.S. multinational organizations; 2. analyze levels of diversity within several companies in multiple industries; 3. construct a body of evidence from the project research; 4. apply what is learned in interviews towards agreeing with or refuting project research; 5. assess the varying degree of diversity as it relates to organizational performance; and 6. propose a conclusion that answers all the questions raised during project inception. The final paper: Your project paper – written in the 3rd person – is submitted in 3 stages: A 15 page [or more] draft called “week 4 version”, a final draft version [of 40 or more pages of narrative] called “week 6 version,” and the Final, complete paper.

You may submit these at any time before they are due. If any assignments are late, a 10 percent deduction will be applied to your score no matter what the reason. The final, complete paper will not be accepted late beyond the deadline. Near the end of week 4, September 27, a draft is to be submitted of narrative [i.e., your Introduction plus a substantial portion of your Literature Review, plus the current references. I’ll be able to give you advice on content, writing style, etc., after seeing this draft.

Because projects and papers vary so much, it is difficult to provide specific details of what is acceptable. Here are a few ranges, as well as minimums: · APA format, style, and grammatical guidelines [e.g., avoid use of “I”, “you”, “we” etc.] · 45-60 pages of body in length is typical (not including title page, abstract, or references) (Requirements: 40 pages, including 25 pages minimum Literature Review). This quantitative standard is a course requirement – no exceptions. · The “Introduction” will typically run about two pages. · Three analytical components are required such as: · Pro Forma financial statements, · Financial analysis (ratios), · Surveys with quantifiable results, · Raw data with statistical analysis, · Benchmarking analysis, · Modeling techniques.

Paper For Above instruction

The capstone experience outlined emphasizes comprehensive research and analysis within a structured academic framework. Central to this project is an exploration of diversity challenges within small U.S. multinational organizations and how such diversity impacts organizational performance. This research aims to inform effective diversity management strategies that align with organizational goals, competitiveness, and cultural integration in a global context. The project involves multiple deliverables, including staged drafts, culminating in a detailed final paper conforming to APA standards, encompassing extensive empirical data, theoretical analysis, and critical evaluations.

Initially, students must draft a preliminary version (“week 4” draft), roughly 15 pages or more, which includes the introduction, a significant portion of the literature review, and current references. This draft serves as a formative tool for feedback and guidance (Elison, 2023). The subsequent version (“week 6”) must expand to over 40 pages, providing a more comprehensive narrative of the research findings and analysis. The final submission consolidates all prior work into a polished, scholarly paper exceeding 40 pages. All submissions must adhere strictly to the APA format, style, and grammatical conventions, ensuring clarity, professionalism, and academic rigor.

The project’s scope includes evaluating how diversity influences recruitment, performance, and competitive advantage in small multinational firms. Key research questions focus on defining workplace diversity, its operationalization in small organizations, its impact on recruitment processes, and how global diversity is managed to enhance organizational effectiveness (Elison, 2023). Methodologically, the research leans heavily on scholarly literature, including empirical studies, theoretical models, and benchmarking analyses, with support from statistical tools such as ratio analysis, surveys, and data modeling. This methodological diversity aims to generate robust, evidence-based conclusions that directly inform managerial strategies for diversity integration.

The structured presentation of results and discussion sections will interpret findings related to diversity’s role in organizational success, providing insights into best practices and potential pitfalls. This process involves critical evaluation of diversity initiatives, supported by quantitative data such as financial ratios and survey results, to assess their impact on organizational metrics and performance indicators (Elison, 2023). Overall, the project seeks not merely to understand diversity but to develop actionable recommendations for small U.S. multinational organizations aiming to optimize their diversity strategies for better global competitiveness and efficiency.

References

• Elison, S. (2023). Capstone Experience Instructions. Unpublished manuscript.
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
• Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research. Wiley.
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
• Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management. Pearson.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson.