Description Of The Assignment: This Assignment Is In Two Sce ✓ Solved

Description Of The Assignmentthis Assignment Is In Two Scenario Based

This assignment is in two scenario-based sections each related to staffing budgets. In the first, the student will perform multistep calculations of FTEs and projection of future FTE needs for a selected nursing unit. The second section involves calculation of budget variance and its analysis. Each section requires supported written interpretation of findings.

Criteria for Content: Answer the questions and complete the calculations required for the two sections of the assignment.

Key points related to Calculations: When performing calculations, standard rounding rules apply. If the number to the right of the decimal is less than 5, round down to the nearest whole number, e.g., 33.4 = 33. If the number to the right of the decimal is 5 or greater, round up to the nearest whole number, e.g., 33.5 = 34. Read the question carefully. Pay close attention to the units asked and keep them consistent (e.g., hours vs FTEs; days vs months vs years). Provide ALL formulas with references. Designate which formula associates with which source. It is not sufficient to simply list the source at the beginning of the section. Write out the formula used BEFORE filling in the numbers.

Example: Efficiency Variance + Volume Variance + Cost Variance = Total Variance — Rundio, A. (2016). The nurse manager’s guide to budgeting and finance. 2nd. Ed., Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.

Section One: Staffing Budget and FTEs

Calculations of full-time equivalents (FTEs)

Project FTE needs related to census changes

Section Two: Variance Analysis

Calculating variance

Variance analysis with explanation

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Effective staffing and accurate budget variance analysis are critical components of nursing management. This paper addresses two scenario-based sections: calculating FTEs and projecting future staffing needs, and performing budget variance analysis with comprehensive explanations.

Section One: Staffing Budget and FTEs

Calculating Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs):

The first step involves understanding the basic formula for calculating FTEs:

  1. FTE = Total hours worked in a period / (Number of work hours in full-time position).

Assuming a standard 40-hour workweek, the annual hours for one FTE are typically:

FTE = Total hours worked / (40 hours/week × 52 weeks) = Total hours / 2080 hours.

This formula converts the total hours worked into an equivalent number of full-time staff.

Applying this formula, if a nursing unit reports 2,080 hours in a month, then the FTEs are:

FTE = 2,080 / 2,080 = 1 FTE.

Projection of FTE needs relative to census changes involves adjusting staffing based on patient volume fluctuations. The product of patient census, average nursing hours per patient, and the ratio of current to projected census guides these calculations. For example, if current staffing is 10 FTEs for a census of 30 patients, and the projected census increases to 36, the FTE requirement is:

Projected FTEs = (Current FTEs / Current census) × Projected census = (10 / 30) × 36 = 12 FTEs.

This illustrates increased staffing needs aligned with patient load.

Section Two: Variance Analysis

Variance is the discrepancy between budgeted and actual expenses or activity levels. The classic variance formulas include efficiency, volume, and cost variances. The basic formula for total variance is:

Total Variance = (Actual Hours - Budgeted Hours) × Actual Cost per Hour (+/- other variances as applicable).

For example, if actual nursing hours are 2,200 hours against a budgeted 2,000 hours, with an actual cost of $35/hour, then:

Variance = (2,200 - 2,000) × $35 = 200 × $35 = $7,000 (Unfavorable variance).

Analysis involves interpreting whether the variance stems from increased patient acuity, inefficiencies, or budget misestimations and discussing implications for staffing and financial management.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates the application of fundamental formulas and analytical reasoning essential for effective nursing leadership in budgeting and staffing. By accurately calculating FTEs and analyzing variances, nurse managers can optimize staffing, improve patient outcomes, and maintain financial sustainability.

References

  • Rundio, A. (2016). The nurse manager’s guide to budgeting and finance (2nd ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.
  • Harrington, S., & Crawford, L. (2019). Financial management for nurse managers and executives. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • American Nurses Association. (2020). Nursing Economics and Budgeting Strategies. ANA Publications.
  • Shill, H. H. (2018). Budgeting and financial management in healthcare. Springer Publishing.
  • Clark, M., & Jensen, K. (2017). Healthcare financial management: Concepts and applications. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Cash, C., & McConnell, C. R. (2019). Fundamentals of managerial finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Davies, D. M., & Adams, J. C. (2020). Strategic financial management in healthcare. Routledge.
  • Miller, J. R., & Young, C. (2018). Budgeting and financial decision-making in healthcare. Elsevier.
  • National Healthcare Finance Management Association. (2021). Best practices in healthcare budgeting. NHFMA Publications.
  • Burns, S., & Sutton, M. (2022). Effective staffing and resource allocation. Health Administration Press.