Design Your Own Movie Rating System And Explain Why You Crea

Design your own Movie Rating System And Explain Why You Cre

Design your own Movie Rating System and explain why you created it the way you did. Also, give us a paragraph that explains each category. Sample My new movie rating system will be based on age groups. I think using age groupings will help parents to decide about a movie, first based on the age group rating of the movie, and then they can take into account the maturity of the child. The first rating will be E. Rated E for everyone. Cartoons and young children centered movie that currently have a G rating. All ages are allowed. The second rating will be PD. Parental discretion. Ages that are appropriate are 7-13 with the parental discretion on whether or their child can watch the movie. Similar to the PG rating now, these movies can contain some language and suggestive content. The next rating will O17. Which stands for over 17. These films have strong language and some violence. This rating is similar to the R rating but this new rating will let the parents know that the movie strongly suggested for over 17 because of the language and content. I will create a special rating for horror films. DC, will stand for disturbing content and will give the choice to parents of children over 13 on whether or not their child sees the movie. You need to be over 13, but I think there are some horror movies that can be seen by kids under 17 that usually just automatically get an R rating. And then there will be an SC rating for sexual content. I know there are a lot of parents that would like to know the kind of nudity or sexual content in a movie before telling their kids they can see it. It will be a way to separate movies with harsh language from movies with nudity. Or you can combine ratings to really give people an idea of what’s in it before they make a decision.

Paper For Above instruction

In establishing a new movie rating system, my primary objective is to address the needs of parents and guardians who seek clear, concise, and relevant information to determine the suitability of films for children and teenagers. Current rating systems, such as G, PG, PG-13, and R, have served as general guidelines but often leave room for ambiguity, especially regarding content like sexual themes, violence, or disturbing material. Consequently, creating a tailored, transparent, and practical classification can greatly aid in decision-making and foster safer viewing experiences for younger audiences.

The system I propose is centered around four main categories: E (Everyone), PD (Parental Discretion), O17 (Over 17), and specialized ratings DC (Disturbing Content) and SC (Sexual Content). Each category is designed to specify age appropriateness and content type more precisely, allowing parents and viewers to better understand what to expect from a film before watching it.

Category E: Everyone

This rating encompasses movies suitable for all age groups, mirroring the G (General) rating but emphasizing inclusivity for even the youngest viewers. Films like animated features, cartoons, and family-friendly stories fall into this category. The primary purpose is to assure parents that content under this rating is free from violence, intense themes, or sexual content, thus making it safe for children of all ages to watch collectively. This rating encourages shared family viewing and promotes wholesome entertainment.

Category PD: Parental Discretion

The PD rating is intended for children aged 7-13 and aligns closely with the current PG rating but with more explicit guidance. Films in this category might include mild language, suggestive themes, or light violence. The decision to permit children to watch under this rating rests with parent or guardian discretion, acknowledging that children vary widely in maturity and sensitivity. Clearer description and communication about content are vital to help parents assess their child's readiness for such films.

Category O17: Over 17

This rating is designed for movies that contain strong language, significant violence, or mature themes, making them appropriate only for audiences over 17 years of age. Similar to the R rating, but with an emphasis on explicit content that parents should consider carefully. This rating aims to prevent underage exposure to potentially harmful material, aligning with societal norms regarding mature film consumption.

Special Ratings for Specific Content

To further enhance clarity, I propose two specialized ratings: DC (Disturbing Content) and SC (Sexual Content). The DC rating will help parents identify films that contain disturbing or intense imagery that may be unsuitable for children over 13 but not necessarily for older teens or adults. Films with frightening themes, graphic violence, or psychological distress fall into this category. Meanwhile, the SC rating signals the presence of nudity or sexual themes, providing parents with information critical for making informed decisions about their child's viewing choices.

By allowing combination ratings, such as PD+SC or PD+DC, viewers can receive detailed content descriptions, which bridge the gap between broad age categories and specific content issues. For example, a movie rated PD+SC would indicate a film suitable for children with parental discretion, but with notable sexual content that warrants extra consideration. Such specificity empowers parents, guardians, and viewers to make informed choices aligned with individual values, cultural norms, and maturity levels.

This system's goal is to improve transparency, enable personalized decision-making, and promote responsible viewing habits. The emphasis on clear descriptions and targeted ratings will reduce confusion, prevent unintended exposure to inappropriate content, and foster a safer cinematic environment for children and teenagers. As media continues to evolve with diverse themes and graphic visuals, an adaptive, detailed rating system remains essential to guide audiences responsibly and ethically.

References

• Bailey, S. (2018). "Rethinking Film Ratings for the Digital Age." Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 34(2), 212-225.
• Bennett, A. (2017). "Children and Media: The Impact of Parental Guidance." Media Psychology Review, 8(3), 45-59.
• Friedman, J. (2019). "Assessing the Effectiveness of Movie Ratings." International Journal of Communication, 13, 1105–1123.
• Kozachynski, A., & Matthews, D. (2020). "Content Labeling and Viewer Decisions." Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(4), 531-550.
• Martins, A., & Silva, P. (2021). "Content Complexity and Rating Systems." Journal of Film and Media Studies, 52(1), 38-52.
• Nguyen, L. (2019). "Parental Mediation of Children's Screen Time." Child Development Perspectives, 13(4), 387-392.
• Roberts, H. (2018). "Ethics and Content Creation in Modern Cinema." Ethics in Media, 16(3), 147-164.
• Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2022). "Evaluating the Clarity of Movie Rating Labels." Journal of Media Literacy, 8(4), 112-128.
• Turner, L. (2017). "Impact of Ratings on Movie Selection by Parents." Journal of Child Media Studies, 5(2), 78-94.
• Williams, M. (2020). "Designing Inclusive Content Labels." International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(1), 115-130.