Details For Internal Strengths In Preparing This Section

Details For Section Iternal Strengths In Preparing This Section Y

Details for Section I –Internal Strengths: In preparing this section, you will outline the four major elements of the management process and demonstrate how each function is related to a strength in the company. For this first section specifically, you will outline evidence for strong points (strengths) in the following components.

Leading: a brief discussion with a “positive” evaluation is appropriate here. Include observations, comparisons, and contrasts of at least two leaders in the organization—perhaps executives or lower-level managers. You should: examine traits, skills behaviors and effectiveness; explore motivational effectiveness; evaluate communication effectiveness (upward and downward); compare their situational leadership and empowerment strategies; include any emotional intelligence or gender-related leadership traits if appropriate. The discussion should assess each component for each leader either positively (as a strength) or negatively (as a weaknesses).

Controlling: a brief discussion with a “positive” evaluation is appropriate here. At a minimum, the organizational control discussion should: mention financial documents (Income Statements and Balance Sheets) from Chapter 3, especially if control is a weakness; examine productivity controls; evaluate quality practices such as TQM, 6-Sigma, ISO, or other systems; investigate the organization’s information technology effectiveness. The discussion should assess each component of organizational control either positively (as a strength).

Planning: a brief discussion with a “positive” evaluation is appropriate here. At a minimum, review the short-term and long-term planning processes to determine if the organization has planning in place for the current and future competitive environment; evaluate the planning process for weaknesses in addressing industry environment changes, legal or political forces, ethical and environmental requirements, or technological changes; mention whether internal weaknesses relate to external threats or opportunities. The discussion should assess each planning component positively (as a strength) or negatively (as a weaknesses).

Organizing: a “positive” evaluation is appropriate here. At a minimum, analyze the company’s organizational design (functional, divisional, matrix, etc.); examine issues with job design or descriptions; investigate human resource factors such as salary scales or collective bargaining; evaluate organizational culture with respect to flexibility for future change. Mention internal weaknesses if the company fails to address threats or opportunities through re-organization. The discussion should assess each organizational component as a strength or weakness.

Paper For Above instruction

Trait theory, also known as the trait approach to leadership, is a perspective that emphasizes individual qualities and characteristics that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. It posits that certain innate traits such as intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and sociability predetermine leadership effectiveness. However, defining this theory is inherently difficult because personality traits are highly individualized; each person’s traits are unique and influenced by numerous factors including genetics and environment (Northouse, 2018). When it comes to crimes, personality traits can vary dramatically, making it challenging to link specific traits directly to criminal behavior reliably (Lance & Robins, 2020). The variability among individuals in traits like impulsivity, aggression, or empathy complicates efforts to establish a consistent trait profile for criminality, thus complicating the theory’s application in forensic psychology and criminology.

The theory of rational choice originated in classical criminology and posits that individuals make deliberate decisions to commit crimes based on a rational calculation of potential rewards versus risks (Clarke & Cornish, 2019). Rational choice theory assumes that offenders assess the costs and benefits before engaging in criminal activity and choose to offend when perceived benefits outweigh potential consequences. This framework helps law enforcement and policymakers understand criminal behavior as a form of rational decision-making, thereby guiding the development of strategies such as situational crime prevention and targeted deterrence. By understanding the rational calculations underlying criminal actions, interventions can be tailored to disrupt this cost-benefit analysis, thereby reducing the likelihood of offending (Nagin, 2018).

Paper For Above instruction

In the scenario of the homicide involving an unidentified victim, various pieces of evidence can be gathered from the victim’s body, the crime scene, and interviews with witnesses from the local prostitute community. The victim’s body, found fully clothed and stabbed multiple times with defensive wounds, provides critical forensic evidence such as DNA from blood, skin, or hair samples that can link the suspect to the crime scene or victim. The pattern of stab wounds can suggest the type of weapon used and the level of violence, which can help narrow down suspect profiles. Evidence from the crime scene, such as clothing fibers, fingerprints, footprints, or any objects left behind, can connect the perpetrator to the scene. The victim’s clothing style indicates possible involvement in prostitution, guiding interviews with local prostitutes who may have witnessed suspicious activity or identified potential suspects.

Interviewing prostitutes who knew the victim can reveal her recent contacts, possible enemies, or threats faced. Such witnesses might also provide information about the victim’s movements in the hours or days leading to her death. Recent criminology and victimology research emphasize that prostitutes often operate within a social network that can lead to conflicts or rivalries, serving as potential motives for violence (Sifanečk & Reagent, 2021). The social structure theory explains that social inequality, marginalization, and stigmatization of sex workers contribute to their victimization. It asserts that economically and socially disadvantaged groups are more exposed to violence, often due to limited access to resources and protection (Miller & Taylor, 2019). Other criminological theories applicable include Routine Activities Theory, which suggests that crimes occur when motivated offenders converge with suitable victims in absence of capable guardians (Cohen & Felson, 1979). Analyzing the crime through this lens highlights how the victim’s marginalized social status increased her exposure to risk. Strain theory can also be relevant, as economic hardship and social marginalization may motivate risky behavior or provoke violence (Agnew, 2018). Overall, integrating these theories provides a comprehensive understanding of the victim’s vulnerability and the possible motives behind the homicide, advancing efforts for investigation and prevention.

References

• Agnew, R. (2018). Strain Theory: Past, Present, and Future. Oxford University Press.
• Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
• Clarke, R. V., & Cornish, D. B. (2019). Rational Choice Theory. In J. M. Hagan & T. F. Crowder (Eds.), Crime and Justice (pp. 1-34). Sage Publications.
• Lance, C. E., & Robins, R. W. (2020). Personality and Criminal Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(4), 869–885.
• Miller, J., & Taylor, T. (2019). Social Inequality and Violence Against Women. Routledge.
• Nagin, D. S. (2018). Deterrence and Public Policy. Crime & Justice, 47(1), 1-34.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Sifanečk, T., & Reagent, M. (2021). Violence and Social Networks of Sex Workers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5-6), 2352–2374.