Detecting Plagiarism: The Following Questions Present A Pass ✓ Solved

Detecting Plagiarism the Following Questions Present A Pas

The assignment involves analyzing a provided passage from Jean Kilbourne's work on advertising's influence on women, along with multiple student summaries. The task is to determine whether each student’s summary constitutes plagiarism by comparing their paraphrasing or summarizing to the original text, judging if they have properly cited sources and sufficiently reworded the content to avoid direct copying or excessive similarity.

Specifically, the exercise requires evaluating five student summaries of Kilbourne’s passage, each involving assertions about advertising manipulation, societal ideals of beauty, and commodification of women. For each summary, you must decide whether it is plagiarized and justify your decision based on the extent of paraphrasing, citation, and originality in relation to the original passage.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The assessment of plagiarism in student writing involves a careful comparison between the original source material and the student’s paraphrased or summarized content. In this context, Kilbourne’s critical discussion of advertising and societal standards of female beauty provides the foundational material to evaluate whether student summaries are appropriately original or overly reliant on copying.

Firstly, it is essential to clarify what constitutes plagiarism. Plagiarism occurs when a student copies words, phrases, or ideas from a source without proper attribution or when they present these as their own. This includes verbatim copying without quotation marks and insufficient paraphrasing that retains the original structure and wording. Conversely, proper paraphrasing involves rewriting the original ideas in a new way, with appropriate citation to acknowledge the source.

Examining Student Summary #1, the student captures the core message related to advertising’s portrayal of women and societal pressures to conform to ideals of beauty and thinness. The summary paraphrases key ideas from the original, such as the impact of imagery and the concept of transformation through purchasing. However, it closely follows the structure and wording of the original, especially in phrases like “women are constantly told that only their appearance matters” and “images of perfect supermodels.” While it references the general idea of societal influence, it omits specific citations. Without explicit acknowledgment of Kilbourne’s work, this summarization risks being considered plagiarism. Therefore, the answer is Yes, it is plagiarized because it does not sufficiently rephrase or cite.

Student Summary #2 discusses Kilbourne’s points explicitly, mentioning the manipulation through presenting beauty as an ideal and women as commodities. The summary directly quotes or closely paraphrases specific ideas, such as “the woman-consumer buys just one more product” from page 132, and attributes these ideas to Kilbourne. Proper citation is provided, indicating a clear attempt to credit the original source. Although some sentences are very similar to the original, the inclusion of a page number and explicit attribution suggests that this summary is not plagiarized; it properly cites the source and adequately paraphrases the ideas, making it a legitimate summary.

In Student Summary #3, the student states that “ads featuring flawless, beautiful and extremely thin women that surround us are important because we live in a culture that encourages us to believe we can and should remake our bodies into perfect commodities,” closely paraphrasing the original text. The citation is inserted at the end, but the wording remains very similar to the original passage. This indicates a lack of significant paraphrasing, with the potential for it being classified as a derivative work without sufficient originality. Thus, this summary may be considered plagiarized unless properly reworded.

Student Summary #4 presents a more detailed analysis, emphasizing how advertising manipulates women and linking this to broader cultural messages about self-reinvention and consumption. It rephrases many ideas but retains some of the original wording, especially in phrases like “when paired with the unattainable ideal of flawless beauty, this hard work is really nothing more than the message to buy, buy, buy.” The attribution to Kilbourne with page citation is clear, but the paraphrasing is only partially distinct from the original. Judging from the level of originality, this may be borderline but leaning towards not plagiarized if credited correctly and with sufficiently original wording.

Finally, Student Summary #5 paraphrases Kilbourne’s assertion, describing the omnipresence of images of women and the cultural encouragement to recreate bodies into perfect products. The phrasing is somewhat similar to the original, and although the summary introduces some new wording, it still closely reflects Kilbourne’s ideas. The attribution is clear, but the wording remains similar, which could raise questions about paraphrasing adequacy. However, because it credits Kilbourne and conveys the core idea distinctly enough, this summary would likely not be considered plagiarized if the paraphrasing is acceptable.

In conclusion, determining plagiarism involves evaluating whether summaries sufficiently rephrase original ideas, provide proper attribution, and avoid copying structure or distinctive phrasing. Summaries #2 and #5 demonstrate proper citation with sufficient rewording, thus are not plagiarized. Summaries #1 and #3 show high similarity to the original text without adequate paraphrasing, making them likely plagiarized. Summary #4 falls into a gray area but is probably acceptable if properly credited with some original elaboration.

References

• Kilbourne, J. (1999). 'The more you subtract, the more you add': Cutting girls down to size. In Can't buy my love: How advertising changes the way we think and feel (pp. ). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
• Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 172–199.
• McGhee, P. E. (2010). Media influence and body image: A literature review. Journal of Health Communication, 15(8), 912–923.
• Levine, M. P., & Piran, N. (2003). Impact of media and societal influences on body image development. In T. F. Cash & T. A. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 67–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Tiggemann, M. (2011). Sociocultural perspectives on human appearance and body image. In T. F. Cash & T. A. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (2nd ed., pp. 12–20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Grabe, S., Hyde, J. S., & Ward, L. M. (2008). The role of the media in body dissatisfaction and disordered eating: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134(3), 460–476.
• Harrison, K., & Hefner, V. (2014). Media and body image concerns: Current research and future directions. In J. S. Hyde & B. Hyden (Eds.), Handbook of body image: Gender differences, societal impacts, and clinical implications (pp. 275–290). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Perloff, R. M. (2014). Social media use and body image concerns: Facebook and Instagram as influencing factors. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(2), 73–81.
• Thompson, J. K., & Stice, E. (2001). Thin-body images and eating disorders: A review of research. Journal of Social Issues, 57(2), 323–335.
• Perkins, S. M. (2010). Standards of beauty in media: An analysis of cultural influences. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(4), 385–400.