Determine The Cost Of Manufacturing One Custom Kitchen

Determine the cost of manufacturing one custom kitchen assuming the units given

T&J Manufacturing produces custom kitchen cabinets with multiple product lines. The company incurs various costs, including materials, labor, and overhead, which must be allocated appropriately to determine the cost per unit. For this analysis, the company's assumptions include material costs of $1,000 for wood and $200 for other direct materials per job, and an average labor requirement of 20 hours per kitchen at a rate of $10 per hour. The sales price is set at a 65% markup on cost. Total estimated direct labor hours for all product lines are 16,000, and approximately 800 units are sold annually.

The annual costs encompass salaries (office and administrative, factory personnel), rent (office and factory), utilities, insurance, depreciation, advertising, sales commissions, property taxes, and maintenance. These costs include both fixed and variable components. The primary focus is on calculating the manufacturing cost per unit, factoring in overhead costs allocated based on direct labor hours. To do so, the first step involves calculating the overhead (MOH) per labor hour.

Given the total factory overhead costs (salaries for factory staff, factory rent, utilities, insurance, depreciation, property taxes, maintenance), the total is $220,000 + $20,000 + $20,000 + $12,000 + $70,000 + $10,000 + $80,000 = $432,000. Dividing this by the total direct labor hours (16,000 hours) yields an overhead rate per hour: $432,000 / 16,000 = $27 per labor hour.

Next, calculate the total direct costs per kitchen: material costs ($1,000 + $200 = $1,200) and labor costs (20 hours x $10/hour = $200). The overhead allocation per unit is 20 hours x $27 = $540. Therefore, the total manufacturing cost per unit is: $1,200 + $200 + $540 = $1,940. The selling price, with a 65% markup, would then be: $1,940 x 1.65 ≈ $3,201. This analysis demonstrates how overhead is allocated based on direct labor hours and the importance of accurate overhead rate calculation. Alternative options for overhead allocation include using machine hours or activity-based costing (ABC), which can provide more precise product costing, especially when multiple products with different resource consumption are involved.

Multiple product lines can influence MOH allocation because different products may utilize overhead resources unequally. If not allocated correctly, it can lead to distorted product costs, affecting pricing decisions and profitability analysis. For instance, if a high-overhead product is underallocated, its cost may appear artificially low, potentially resulting in underpricing and profit margin erosion. Conversely, overallocating overhead to a less resource-intensive product can suppress its competitiveness.

Paper For Above instruction

The accurate determination of the manufacturing cost per unit is essential for T&J Manufacturing to set pricing strategies, analyze profitability, and manage costs effectively. By allocating overhead based on direct labor hours, the company aligns indirect cost assignment with the primary activity driver in a labor-intensive environment. This approach ensures that each product bears a fair share of overhead costs, ultimately leading to more precise product costing decisions.

Alternative activity bases—such as machine hours or units produced—could be employed for overhead allocation. Using machine hours may be more accurate if machinery consumes a significant portion of overhead resources, especially for highly automated processes. Conversely, allocating based on units produced is straightforward but may oversimplify the overhead distribution when products differ substantially in resource requirements. Activity-Based Costing (ABC) further refines overhead allocation by tracing costs to specific activities, allowing for a detailed understanding of the cost drivers and more accurate product costs. Implementing ABC is particularly beneficial when multiple products with diverse consumption patterns share resources, as it minimizes cost distortion.

The existence of multiple product lines complicates overhead allocation, as different products may require varying levels of resources. Proper allocation methods directly impact pricing, cost control, and profitability analysis. Incorrectly assigned overhead costs can lead to misinformed managerial decisions, such as pricing strategies or resource allocation, that may reduce overall profitability.

Failure to allocate MOH appropriately can result in undercosting or overcosting products, causing strategic errors. Underestimated costs might lead to pricing products below their true expense, eroding margins, while overestimated costs could result in prices that are too high, decreasing competitiveness. Accurate overhead allocation thus enhances strategic decision-making by providing a clear picture of product profitability and facilitating better resource management.

References

• Drury, C. (2018). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.
• Garrison, R. H., Noreen, E. W., & Brewer, P. C. (2021). Managerial Accounting. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2019). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Anderson, S. R. (2004). Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review.
• Langfield-Smith, K., Thorne, H., & Fredline, L. (2018). Management Accounting. McGraw-Hill.
• Hilton, R. W., & Platt, D. E. (2016). Managerial Accounting: Creating Value in a Dynamic Business Environment. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2018). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. (2017). Cost Management: A Strategic Approach. Cengage Learning.
• Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1991). Profit Priorities from Activity-Based Costing. Harvard Business Review.
• Innes, J., & Mitchell, F. (2003). Activity-Based Cost Management: An Introduction. In Cost Management (pp. 245–278). Routledge.