Develop A 4-6 Page Plan To Evaluate Your 890365

Develop A 4 6 Page Plan That Will Allow You To Evaluate Your Intervent

Develop a 4-6 page plan that will allow you to evaluate your intervention. You will also be required to submit your completed practicum hours using CORE ELMS. You must submit a minimum of 20 confirmed hours with each assessment deliverable to receive a grade for the entire assessment. Introduction Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Once an intervention is planned and implemented it is important to evaluate the degree to which the outcomes of the project were achieved. By evaluating the desired outcomes of an intervention, it is possible to make more informed decisions about opportunities for continuous improvement. It is also possible to identify strategies and approaches that could be useful in improving one's personal practice in other contexts or care areas. Preparations Read Guiding Questions: Evaluation Plan Design [DOC]. This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete this assessment.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment. What specific piece or pieces of technology did you propose using in your implementation plan? How did the type of technology you chose impact the development of your implementation plan?

How will the incorporation of the technology you propose make your implementation plan more successful? Instructions Note: The assessments in this course are sequenced in such a way as to help you build specific skills that you will use throughout your program. Complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented. Your evaluation plan design will be the fourth section of your final project submission. The goal for this is to finalize the outcomes that your plan is seeking to achieve and to create a plan to evaluate the degree to which those outcomes would have been achieved if your intervention plan has been implemented.

This will allow you to determine the degree to which the plan was successful in addressing the identified need of your target population and setting. You will also discuss ways in which your role allows you to lead change and drive quality improvement, and to potentially improve the project in the future. In addition, you will reflect on how the project will leave you better prepared for success in other aspects of your current and future career. Provide enough detail so that the faculty member assessing your implementation plan design and discussion will be able to provide substantive feedback that you will be able to incorporate into the final draft of your project. At minimum, be sure to address the bullet points below, as they correspond to the grading criteria.

You may also want to read the scoring guide and the Guiding Questions: Evaluation Plan Design [DOC] document to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. In addition to the bullet points below, provide a brief introduction that refreshes the reader's memory about your problem statement, your planned intervention, and how you intended to implement your intervention (this should only be a single paragraph). Reminder: These instructions are an outline. Your heading for this section should be Evaluation of Plan and not Part 1: Evaluation of Plan. Part 1: Evaluation of Plan Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan.

Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need. Part 2: Discussion Advocacy Analyze the nurse's role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care. Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the health care field gains from the plan. Future Steps Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact in the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety. Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions.

Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts. Address Generally Throughout Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of an evaluation plan for an intervention, as well as for professional discussion about the plan. Communicate evaluation plan and discussion of the project in a professional way that helps the audience to understand how the outcomes will be evaluated, as well as what was learned through the project process.

Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

The focus of this project is to develop a comprehensive evaluation plan for a proposed health intervention aimed at improving patient outcomes within a specific clinical setting. The intervention involves implementing a new health technology — such as electronic health records (EHR) enhancements or telehealth services — designed to address identified gaps in care delivery. The implementation plan includes targeted staff training, resource allocation, and stakeholder engagement to ensure successful deployment. The primary goal is to assess the effectiveness of these measures in achieving improved patient safety, enhanced communication, and better health management outcomes.

Part 1: Outcomes and Evaluation Plan

The core outcomes for the intervention are increased accuracy in patient documentation, reduced medication errors, higher patient satisfaction scores, and improved adherence to clinical guidelines. To evaluate whether these outcomes are met, a multi-faceted evaluation plan will be employed. Quantitative data will be collected through pre- and post-intervention surveys, audit reports, and incident reports to measure error rates, compliance levels, and patient satisfaction. Qualitative feedback will be gathered via focus groups and staff interviews to understand user experiences and barriers.

Specifically, the evaluation will focus on measuring the reduction in preventable adverse events, such as medication discrepancies, as well as improvements in communication and workflow efficiency. Metrics such as the percentage change in error rates, staff adherence to new protocols, and patient satisfaction scores will be analyzed using statistical methods. Additionally, process evaluation will monitor the fidelity of implementation, assessing whether the intervention components are delivered as planned and identifying areas for refinement.

Part 2: Advocacy and Interprofessional Collaboration

The nurse’s role in leading change is pivotal in the success of the intervention. As frontline care providers, nurses serve as advocates for patient safety and quality improvement. They are instrumental in educating staff, modeling best practices, and providing continuous feedback about the intervention’s impact. In leading change, nurses leverage their clinical expertise and patient advocacy skills to promote a culture of safety and accountability.

The intervention positively influences nursing practice by fostering greater collaboration across disciplines. For example, effective communication facilitated by technology enhances interprofessional teamwork, streamlining care coordination. It also expands opportunities for shared decision-making, ultimately improving patient outcomes and care experiences. The healthcare field benefits from such initiatives through enhanced data transparency, reduced errors, and a culture that prioritizes continuous improvement.

Future Steps and Innovation

Future improvements should include integrating emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) to support clinical decision-making, or leveraging remote patient monitoring to extend care beyond the hospital setting. Expanding the intervention to other departments or healthcare systems can amplify its impact. Incorporating lessons learned from initial implementation will inform tailored adaptations for diverse clinical contexts, ensuring scalability and sustainability.

Additionally, adopting innovative care models such as patient-centered medical homes or value-based care initiatives can foster a proactive approach to health management and prevention. Investing in ongoing staff training and stakeholder engagement will sustain momentum and facilitate continual refinement aligned with evolving healthcare standards and technological advancements.

Reflection on Leading Change and Personal Growth

This project has significantly enhanced my leadership skills by providing firsthand experience in guiding change within a complex healthcare environment. I learned the importance of effective communication, stakeholder collaboration, and data-driven decision-making. Navigating resistance and encouraging engagement among diverse team members underscored the value of transformational leadership.

Transferring the lessons from this intervention to my personal practice involves embracing a mindset of continuous quality improvement. Whether advocating for new technology or process changes, I recognize the importance of building consensus, providing education, and monitoring outcomes. Future leadership roles will benefit from these insights, enabling me to foster a culture of safety and innovation that drives meaningful improvements in patient care.

References

• Institute of Medicine. (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academies Press.
• Currie, L., & DeBruler, K. (2018). Nurse-led quality improvement initiatives: A review of best practices. Journal of Nursing Management, 26(7), 751-757.
• Rosenberg, L., & Smith, J. (2020). Leveraging health information technology for patient safety. Journal of Healthcare Quality, 42(4), 205-213.
• World Health Organization. (2017). WHO global strategy on digital health 2020-2025. WHO.
• Gordon, S., et al. (2019). Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Strategies for success. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(3), 347-353.
• Leipzig, R. M., et al. (2021). Incorporating emerging technologies in clinical settings for improved health outcomes. Advances in Healthcare Technology, 2(1), 1-10.
• Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academies Press.
• Oberle, K., & Hughes, A. (2020). The nurse’s role in driving quality improvement. Nursing Economics, 38(2), 60-67.
• Sullivan, E. J., & Decker, P. A. (2018). Effective Leadership and Management in Nursing. Pearson Education.
• McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. (2017). Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge. Jones & Bartlett Learning.