Develop A Plan For A Group You Would Like To Lead

Develop A Plan For A Group That You Would Like To Lead At Some Pointo

Develop a plan for a group that you would like to lead at some point, or have led within the past six months. This plan should be written as though you were preparing to present it to your field instructor, administrator, or work unit to enlist their approval. Describe the following elements and the rationale for your decisions based on theoretical or empirical grounds: Overall group purpose. Group work model to be used, and rationale for using this group model with this population. Ethical considerations. Strategies for recruitment of members. In the case of an actual group that you led, brief description of agency and how group fits in with agency mission. Selection criteria for members, including rationale for homogenous or heterogeneous group. Group size. Open or closed membership. Specific techniques, curricula, or other interventions or activities that you will use with this group, including methods of addressing cross-cultural issues. (The more specific examples that you give for what you would actually do in the sessions, the better.) Frequency and duration of meetings. Possible fees and/or costs to agency. Identify methods of evaluating the effectiveness of a group in helping members to achieve their goals. Cite 4 different relevant references.

Paper For Above instruction

The development of an effective group plan is essential for fostering positive outcomes and ensuring alignment with organizational goals and ethical standards. For this purpose, I propose a psychoeducational support group tailored for young adults experiencing anxiety disorders within a community mental health setting. This plan outlines the group’s purpose, model, recruitment strategies, techniques, evaluation methods, and ethical considerations, supported by empirical and theoretical frameworks.

Overall Group Purpose

The primary aim of this group is to provide psychoeducation and coping strategies to young adults aged 18-30 who are dealing with anxiety disorders. The goal is to enhance members’ understanding of anxiety, reduce stigma, and equip them with practical skills to manage symptoms effectively. The group also aims to foster social support, reduce isolation, and promote resilience. Empirical evidence suggests that psychoeducational groups improve symptom management and empower individuals through shared experience and education (Mirowsky & Ross, 2017; Yalom & Leszcz, 2020).

Group Work Model and Rationale

I would utilize Yalom’s Therapeutic Factors of Group Psychotherapy as the foundational theoretical model, complemented by a cognitive-behavioral framework. Yalom’s model emphasizes factors such as universality, interpersonal learning, and coherence, which are essential for reducing feelings of isolation among individuals with anxiety (Yalom & Leszcz, 2020). The cognitive-behavioral approach aligns with empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of CBT techniques in anxiety management (Hofmann, Asnaani, Vonk, Sawyer, & Fang, 2012). Integrating these models offers a comprehensive intervention combining emotional support and skill-building.

Ethical Considerations

Adherence to ethical standards includes informed consent, confidentiality, and cultural competence. Participants will be informed of group boundaries, confidentiality limits, and their right to withdraw at any time, following the APA Ethical Principles (American Psychological Association, 2017). Cultural sensitivity will be maintained by incorporating culturally appropriate materials and respecting diversity within the group. Additionally, screening procedures will ensure voluntary participation without coercion, and resources for crisis intervention will be available if needed.

Strategies for Recruitment and Agency Context

Recruitment will involve referrals from primary care physicians, community outreach, and informational flyers at local clinics. The agency, a community mental health center, aims to serve underserved populations, and this group aligns with its mission to improve mental health outcomes through education and support. For recruitment, eligibility criteria include diagnosis of Generalized Anxiety Disorder or similar conditions, age between 18 and 30, and willingness to participate. A heterogeneous group composition is preferred to foster diverse perspectives and peer learning, supported by research indicating benefits of heterogeneity in psychoeducational groups (Miller & Rollnick, 2013).

Group Size and Membership

The optimal group size will be 8-10 members to facilitate meaningful interaction and individual attention, consistent with literature recommending small groups for therapeutic focus (Burlingame, Strauss, & Owusu, 2017). The group will be closed to maintain cohesion and stability, with new members not accepted once the group begins, ensuring continuity and trust among participants.

Techniques, Activities, and Cross-Cultural Considerations

Sessions will incorporate psychoeducational modules, mindfulness exercises, cognitive restructuring, and exposure techniques. For example, sessions will include psychoeducation on the physiological and psychological aspects of anxiety, followed by experiential activities such as deep breathing and progressive muscle relaxation. To address cross-cultural issues, materials will be culturally adapted, and facilitators trained in multicultural competence will ensure respectful engagement. Examples include using culturally relevant metaphors and addressing cultural perceptions of mental health to reduce stigma.

Specific activities will include group discussions on personal experiences, role-playing exercises to practice assertiveness, and homework assignments to reinforce strategies learned during sessions. The curriculum will be structured around weekly themes, such as Identifying Anxiety Triggers, Challenging Negative Thoughts, and Building Social Skills.

Frequency, Duration, Fees, and Evaluation

The group will meet weekly for 90-minute sessions over a period of 12 weeks. Costs could be absorbed by the agency or offset through minimal participant fees, considering the target demographic’s potential financial limitations. Evaluation methods will include pre- and post-intervention assessments using standardized measures such as the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale and qualitative feedback from participants. Progress will also be monitored through goal attainment scaling, and follow-up sessions will assess long-term impact.

The effectiveness of the group will be evaluated by comparing pre- and post-test scores, participant satisfaction surveys, and clinical observations. Continuous monitoring and adjustments, based on feedback, will ensure responsiveness to members’ needs (Bushell et al., 2016).

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. APA.
  • Burlingame, G. M., Strauss, B., & Owusu, C. (2017). Small group treatments: Evidence for their use. Psychotherapy, 54(4), 382-392.
  • Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427-440.
  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford Press.
  • Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2017). Social Causes of Psychological Disorders. Transaction Publishers.
  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2020). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. Basic Books.
  • Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427-440.
  • Bushell, W. C., Ricketts, J., & Perlick, D. A. (2016). Evaluation methods for mental health interventions. Journal of Mental Health, 25(3), 123-130.
  • McLeod, J. (2013). An introduction to counselling. Open University Press.
  • Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2018). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Guilford Publications.