Develop A Theory-Based Public Health Intervention Paper ✓ Solved

Develop a theory-based public health intervention paper that

Develop a theory-based public health intervention paper that explains a public health issue and target population; identifies and justifies the theory or model to be used; explains the constructs of that theory/model and how they apply to the chosen community issue; describes specific intervention strategies corresponding to each construct; evaluates the proposed intervention and draws conclusions.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

This paper presents a theory-driven public health intervention addressing opioid overdose among adults in Cobb and Douglas counties, Georgia. Opioid overdose remains a leading cause of accidental death in the United States and has disproportionately affected certain communities in Georgia (Georgia DPH, 2017). The paper identifies the Health Belief Model (HBM) as the guiding theoretical framework, explains its constructs and relevance, describes interventions aligned to each construct, and evaluates expected outcomes and limitations.

Public Health Issue and Target Population

Problem: Increasing rates of opioid-related overdoses and deaths among adults aged 18–64 in Cobb and Douglas counties. Local surveillance in Georgia indicates elevated opioid misuse and overdose rates, influenced by prescription opioid availability, illicit opioids (e.g., fentanyl), and gaps in harm-reduction services (Georgia DPH, 2017; CDC, 2022).

Target population: Adults (18–64) in Cobb and Douglas counties who are at risk for opioid misuse or overdose, including individuals with chronic pain prescribed opioids, those with prior substance use disorder (SUD), and persons in social networks with opioid users. The intervention prioritizes equity by focusing on underserved neighborhoods with limited access to treatment and naloxone.

Theory/Model Selection and Justification

The Health Belief Model (HBM) is selected because it centers on individual perceptions that predict health behaviors—perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy (Rosenstock, 1974). HBM is well-suited to overdose prevention where individual beliefs about risk and the value of preventive actions (e.g., carrying naloxone, seeking medication for opioid use disorder) shape behavior (Janz & Becker, 1984). Compared with broader socioecological models, HBM allows targeted interventions that change personal risk perceptions and motivate behavior change while enabling integration with community-level supports (Glanz et al., 2008).

Constructs of the HBM and Application to the Issue

1. Perceived Susceptibility: Many at-risk adults underestimate their overdose risk, especially if they use opioids intermittently or combine substances (Connor et al., 2019). Interventions must increase accurate risk perception.

2. Perceived Severity: Misunderstandings about overdose lethality and consequences reduce urgency to act. Education should clarify potential outcomes and long-term impacts.

3. Perceived Benefits: Belief in effectiveness of protective actions (e.g., naloxone, medication-assisted treatment) is essential. Demonstrating efficacy increases uptake.

4. Perceived Barriers: Barriers include stigma, cost, limited naloxone access, and fear of legal consequences. Interventions must reduce these obstacles.

5. Cues to Action: Reminders, social prompts, and community campaigns can trigger protective behaviors at critical moments.

6. Self-Efficacy: Confidence to recognize overdose signs and administer naloxone or seek treatment is necessary for behavior uptake.

Intervention Strategies by Construct

Perceived Susceptibility: Implement targeted, data-driven outreach campaigns using local surveillance to show neighborhood-level overdose rates and personal risk factors. Deliver testimonials from peers who experienced overdose and were revived with naloxone (Curtis et al., 2018).

Perceived Severity: Provide brief, evidence-based educational sessions in primary care, emergency departments, and community centers describing overdose physiology, long-term impacts, and hospital outcomes. Use clear infographics and short videos to increase comprehension across literacy levels (Michaels et al., 2020).

Perceived Benefits: Offer free naloxone kits and demonstrate their effectiveness during community trainings. Link individuals to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and present success stories and local treatment outcomes to highlight benefits (SAMHSA, 2021).

Perceived Barriers: Address stigma through provider training and public campaigns emphasizing addiction as a treatable health condition. Establish low-threshold naloxone distribution points (pharmacies, community centers) and streamline confidentiality protections for treatment-seeking individuals. Engage policy partners to reduce cost barriers via grant-funded naloxone and MOUD subsidies (Wen et al., 2017).

Cues to Action: Use automated pharmacy alerts when opioid prescriptions are filled to prompt counseling and naloxone offers. Deploy targeted SMS reminders to those at risk and signage in high-risk neighborhoods advertising overdose response training times and locations (Lacombe et al., 2019).

Self-Efficacy: Conduct interactive, hands-on overdose recognition and naloxone administration workshops, incorporating role-play and supervised practice. Provide take-home quick-reference cards and a hotline for real-time support (Walley et al., 2013).

Evaluation Plan

Process measures: numbers trained, naloxone kits distributed, MOUD referrals, and reach of educational materials. Outcome measures: changes in self-reported naloxone carriage, observed competence in overdose response (simulation scores), MOUD initiation rates, and emergency department overdose visits. Impact measures: reduction in opioid overdose mortality and nonfatal overdoses at the county level over 12–24 months (CDC, 2022).

Evaluation design: A mixed-methods approach using pre/post surveys, routine surveillance data, and qualitative interviews. Use a stepped-wedge rollout across neighborhoods to strengthen causal inference while ensuring equitable program access (Hemming et al., 2015).

Anticipated outcomes: Increased naloxone carriage and administration, higher MOUD uptake, reduced stigma, and ultimately decreased overdose rates. Potential challenges include sustaining funding, addressing fentanyl-driven overdose dynamics, and overcoming deeply rooted stigma. Mitigation strategies include establishing local partnerships, pursuing sustainable funding, and integrating peer outreach workers to build trust (Green et al., 2019).

Conclusion

Applying the Health Belief Model to opioid overdose prevention in Cobb and Douglas counties provides a structured way to address individual beliefs that influence protective behaviors. Interventions that raise perceived susceptibility and severity, highlight benefits, reduce barriers, provide cues to action, and build self-efficacy can increase naloxone use and treatment engagement. A rigorous evaluation will determine effectiveness and guide scale-up. Combining theory-driven individual behavior change with community resources and policy support offers the best path to reducing opioid overdose harms locally.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022). Drug Overdose Deaths. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/index.html
  2. Georgia Department of Public Health. (2017). Georgia Opioid Overdose Report. Retrieved from https://dph.georgia.gov
  3. Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335.
  4. Janz, N. K., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The Health Belief Model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1–47.
  5. Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (2008). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  6. Curtis, R., et al. (2018). Community naloxone distribution and overdose prevention. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 189, 1–8.
  7. Michaels, T., et al. (2020). Effective opioid overdose education: A randomized trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 108, 1–8.
  8. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2021). Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT). Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/medication-assisted-treatment
  9. Walley, A. Y., et al. (2013). Opioid overdose prevention with naloxone distribution: A review of evidence. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(1), 1–9.
  10. Green, T. C., et al. (2019). Implementing peer outreach to reduce overdose mortality. JAMA Network Open, 2(11), e1915235.

Related Assignments