Developing An ERM Plan Please Respond To The Following

Developing An Erm Planplease Respond To The Followingfrom A Manag

From a management perspective, decide which key policies and procedures one should consider as the starting point when developing an ERM plan for an organization. Defend your position. Provide a list of essential personnel whom you believe should be involved in creating and maintaining an ERM plan for an organization. Describe the role of each person. Suggest a timeline for establishing an ERM plan, giving your opinion on how frequently the plan should be reviewed.

Paper For Above instruction

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is an integral part of strategic planning and organizational resilience, aimed at identifying, assessing, and managing risks across all levels of an organization. Developing an effective ERM plan requires a comprehensive approach starting with key policies and procedures that establish the foundation for risk governance. This paper discusses the essential policies and procedures, the critical personnel involved in developing and maintaining the ERM, their roles, and appropriate timelines for implementation and review.

Key Policies and Procedures in Developing an ERM Plan

At the outset, organizations must prioritize establishing a clear risk management policy that articulates the organization's attitude, commitment, and approach towards managing risks. This policy should align with the overall strategic goals and define the scope of ERM activities. Additionally, a risk assessment procedure is fundamental, providing structured methods for identifying and evaluating risks across various domains. It enables organizations to understand the likelihood and impact of potential threats.

Another core policy is the communication and reporting protocol, ensuring that risk-related information flows effectively within the organization, facilitating timely decision-making. This includes creating channels for reporting emergent risks and incidents without fear of reprisal, fostering a risk-aware culture. Furthermore, developing a risk control procedure that lays out response strategies, mitigation measures, and contingency plans is vital to managing identified risks proactively.

Finally, policies for ongoing monitoring, review, and continuous improvement of ERM processes are critical. Organizations should embed ERM into their governance frameworks, integrating risk management activities into strategic decision processes. Overall, these policies build a robust foundation enabling organizations to anticipate, prepare for, and respond to uncertainties effectively.

Essential Personnel in Developing and Maintaining an ERM Plan

The development and maintenance of an ERM plan involve several key personnel, each with specific roles. The senior leadership team, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Risk Officer (CRO), provides strategic direction, ensures buy-in, and allocates resources necessary for ERM initiatives. The CRO or risk manager plays a pivotal role in coordinating the risk management framework, conducting risk assessments, and reporting to the board.

The Board of Directors holds oversight responsibility, ensuring ERM aligns with organizational objectives and risk appetite. Operational managers from various departments, such as finance, operations, compliance, and IT, contribute domain-specific insights, identify operational risks, and implement mitigation strategies. Their involvement ensures that ERM is embedded into daily activities and decision-making processes.

Additionally, internal auditors periodically review ERM practices for effectiveness and compliance, providing independent assessments that enhance accountability and continuous improvement. Human resources and communication teams support fostering a risk-aware culture through training and awareness campaigns. The collective effort of these personnel creates a comprehensive, integrated approach to managing organizational risks.

Suggested Timeline for Establishing and Reviewing an ERM Plan

Implementing an ERM plan should follow a structured timeline. Initially, organizations may allocate 3 to 6 months for the development phase, including policy formulation, personnel engagement, and initial risk assessments. During this period, assessing existing risk management practices and establishing communication channels should be prioritized.

Once the ERM framework is operational, a formal review should occur annually to evaluate effectiveness, update risk registers, and refine response strategies. However, organizations operating in rapidly changing environments, such as financial services or technology sectors, might benefit from more frequent reviews—biannual or quarterly—to stay ahead of emerging risks.

In addition to scheduled reviews, organizations should consider triggering ad hoc reviews in response to significant internal or external events—such as regulatory changes, market disruptions, or major organizational shifts. This proactive approach ensures that ERM remains dynamic, relevant, and capable of supporting organizational resilience.

Conclusion

Developing a comprehensive ERM plan is essential for organizational stability and strategic success. Starting with core policies such as risk governance, assessment, communication, and monitoring establishes a structured foundation. Involving key personnel—executive leadership, risk officers, operational managers, board members, auditors, and communication specialists—ensures an integrated approach. Establishing a realistic timeline with ongoing reviews maintains the ERM system's relevance and effectiveness, ultimately fostering a resilient, risk-aware organizational culture.

References

• Fraser, J., & Simkins, B. (2016). Enterprise risk management: Today's leading research and best practices for tomorrow's executives. Wiley.
• Hoyt, R. E., & Liebenberg, A. P. (2011). The value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795–822.
• Li, H., & Pitzer, J. (2014). Risk management and corporate governance: Evidence from financial firms. Journal of Financial Crime, 21(3), 251–264.
• Lam, J. (2014). Enterprise Risk Management: From Incentives to Controls (2nd ed.). Wiley.
• Mikes, A. (2011). Risk management and risk culture. Management Decision, 49(7), 1005–1016.
• Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 849-855.
• Singleton, T., & Haugh, C. (2018). Practical risk management for financial institutions. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26(2), 228–243.
• Springett, D. (2010). Organizational risk—A systemic approach. Routledge.
• Turnbull, S. (2004). Enterprise risk management: The case of Barclays Bank. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 8(3), 248-263.
• Verweij, M. (2012). Risk and governance: An introduction. In M. Verweij & P. Robbins (Eds.), Risk and Governance (pp. 1-22). Routledge.