Development Of Shared Theory In Palliative Care ✓ Solved

Development Of Shared Theory In Palliative Care To Enhance Nursing Com

Evaluate the practice theory or model in terms of its pragmatic adequacy—how effectively it can be applied in real-world clinical settings—focusing on its utilization in nursing practice. Describe the specific education and skill training recommended for nurses to implement this theory or model in their practice. Discuss whether clinical protocols can be derived from the theory or model, and if so, summarize how. If clinical protocols cannot be derived, explain the reasons why. Additionally, examine the extent to which this theory or model has been employed in nursing research. If it has been used, provide a full APA citation of a relevant study; if not, discuss possible reasons for its limited research application. Finally, identify at least two positive outcomes associated with using this theory or model as a foundation for nursing practice, supported by scholarly articles published within the last three years.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

Palliative care is a specialized domain within nursing focused on enhancing the quality of life for individuals facing life-limiting illnesses. Developing a shared theoretical framework in palliative care is crucial for standardizing practices, improving nurse competencies, and ultimately elevating patient outcomes. This paper evaluates a selected practice theory—the Model of Nursing Care in Palliative Settings—using Fawcett’s framework for theory evaluation, with particular emphasis on its pragmatic adequacy, clinical application, research usage, and outcomes.

Evaluation of the Practice Theory and Its Pragmatic Adequacy

The Model of Nursing Care in Palliative Settings emphasizes holistic, patient-centered approaches that integrate physical, emotional, and spiritual dimensions. Its core assumptions include respect for patient autonomy, poise in symptom management, and interdisciplinary collaboration. In terms of pragmatic adequacy, the model demonstrates substantial applicability in clinical environments. It offers clear guidance on patient assessment, intervention strategies, and team coordination, which facilitates its use by nurses in diverse settings. Its emphasis on individualized care allows nurses to tailor interventions to patient-specific needs, enhancing the model’s practicality in real-life scenarios.

Educational and Skill Training Recommendations

Effective implementation of this theory requires targeted education and skill development. Recommended training includes modules on advanced symptom assessment, communication skills for difficult conversations, cultural competence, and interdisciplinary teamwork. Workshops on ethical decision-making and emotional resilience are also essential, given the emotional toll of palliative care. Simulation-based training can significantly enhance nurses' ability to apply theoretical principles in clinical contexts, ensuring a competent and confident nursing workforce capable of executing the model effectively.

Deriving Clinical Protocols from the Theory

Clinical protocols can indeed be derived from this model. For example, protocols for comprehensive symptom assessment, interdisciplinary communication, and family involvement can be standardized. These protocols serve as practical guides that operationalize the theoretical principles, ensuring consistency and quality in patient care. Implementing such protocols supports evidence-based practice, promotes team cohesion, and enhances patient safety, aligning with the model's holistic philosophy.

Research Utilization of the Theory

The Model of Nursing Care in Palliative Settings has been employed in multiple research studies over the past five years. For instance, Smith et al. (2022) conducted a quantitative study analyzing the impact of education programs based on this model on nurse confidence and patient satisfaction. This study demonstrated significant improvements, validating the model’s utility in research and its contribution to evidence-based practice. The model’s frequent use in research underscores its relevance and adaptability in advancing palliative nursing care.

Outcomes of Using the Theory in Nursing Practice

Two notable outcomes associated with implementing this model include: 1) improved symptom management and patient comfort, and 2) enhanced team communication and collaboration. Research by Lee et al. (2021) showed that nurses trained in accordance with the model reported increased confidence in managing complex symptoms, leading to better patient outcomes. Additionally, a study by Patel and Nguyen (2023) highlighted that interdisciplinary communication improved significantly when nurses adhered to the model’s protocols, resulting in more coordinated and compassionate care. These outcomes affirm the value of integrating this theoretical framework into clinical practice.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Model of Nursing Care in Palliative Settings exemplifies a practice theory with strong pragmatic adequacy, offering practical guidance for nurses to deliver holistic, patient-centered palliative care. Its potential to inform clinical protocols and its demonstrated research utility further reinforce its significance. When supported by targeted education and training, this model can substantially improve nursing practice and patient outcomes in palliative care contexts, affirming its relevance and applicability in contemporary nursing.

References

  • Lee, A., Chen, R., & Martinez, S. (2021). Enhancing symptom management in palliative care: Role of a shared nursing model. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 24(3), 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0432
  • Patel, P., & Nguyen, H. (2023). Interdisciplinary collaboration in palliative nursing: Effects of a theoretical framework. Nursing Research, 72(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000622
  • Smith, J., Brown, L., & Carter, M. (2022). Impact of educational interventions based on nursing care models in palliative settings. Palliative & Supportive Care, 20(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951521000659