Diagrams And Definitions Should Be Used Where Applicable

Diagrams And Definitions Should Be Used Where Applicable1 A Country

Diagrams and definitions should be used where applicable. 1. A country’s production possibility frontier of cola and pizza is given. (A) Where is the country unable to produce cola or pizza or both? (1 Mark) (B) How does the country face the changes in opportunity costs as it possibly produces various combinations? (1 Mark) (C) Where does the country produce when economic downturn hits and/or resource is being inefficiently used? (1 Mark) (D) Where does “There is no such thing as a free lunch” principle not apply? (1 Mark) (E) When a technological advancement takes place for cola, what are the possible impacts on the frontier? (1 Mark) 2. Explain how rational business people make a decision. Should (a) total benefit should be higher or lower than, or equal to, total costs for them to make a rational decision? Provide an example, which is unavailable from the prescribed textbook or lecture slides. (3 Marks for explanation and 2 Marks for a good example) 3. Two producers have two different production possibility frontiers for wheat and rice. It is said that they are unable to produce beyond the frontiers. With the given set of resources and technology, are they ever be able to go beyond the frontiers if they want to consume more of wheat and rice than they produce? (3 Marks for arguments and 2 Marks for explanation)

Paper For Above instruction

Production possibility frontiers (PPFs) are fundamental in understanding the trade-offs and opportunity costs faced by a country or individual in resource allocation. They graphically represent the maximum feasible combinations of two goods that can be produced with available resources and technology. The analysis of PPFs for a country producing cola and pizza offers critical insights into the constraints and opportunities within its economy, especially when considering shifts due to technological advances, economic downturns, or resource misallocations.

1. A country's production possibility frontier of cola and pizza

(A) The point on the PPF where the country is unable to produce either cola, pizza, or both is known as the boundary or the limit of production capability. This is typically where the PPF curve intersects the axes—either the x-axis (pizza) or y-axis (cola)—indicating maximum production of one good when the other is not produced at all. Points beyond the frontier are unattainable with current resources and technology.

(B) As the country shifts along the PPF, the opportunity costs change due to the law of increasing opportunity costs. This law states that producing more of one good often requires sacrificing increasingly larger amounts of the other, especially if resources are specialized. For example, initially, reallocating resources from pizza to cola might entail a small trade-off, but further reallocation would cost more pizza per unit of cola forgone, reflecting a bowed-out (convex) PPF shape.

(C) When an economic downturn occurs or resources are inefficiently used, the country operates inside the PPF, not on it. This point signifies underutilization of resources or inefficiency. In this scenario, increasing production of either good involves moving toward the PPF boundary, reflecting an improvement in resource utilization or economic recovery.

(D) The "There is no such thing as a free lunch" principle implies that every choice incurs an opportunity cost. This principle does not apply in a theoretical scenario where resources are unlimited or where economic policies eliminate trade-offs, which is unrealistic in practical economics. For example, in a hypothetical economy with unlimited resources, one could produce both goods without sacrificing any quantity, thus making the principle temporarily inapplicable.

(E) A technological advancement in cola production shifts the PPF outward for cola. This expansion indicates that more cola can now be produced using the same resources, leading to an outward bend in the frontier in the cola axis direction. Consequently, the overall capacity of the country increases, potentially allowing for higher combined output of both goods if resources are reallocated efficiently.

2. Rational decision making in business: When benefit exceeds costs

Rational business decisions are guided by the principle that actions should maximize net benefits, which means that total benefits should be higher than total costs. A rational decision maker evaluates all possible options and chooses the one where the difference between benefits and costs—the net benefit—is maximized. If total benefits are lower than total costs, the action results in a net loss and should generally be avoided. Conversely, if benefits equal costs, the decision is marginally beneficial, and careful consideration should be taken to account for qualitative factors.

An example not from textbooks could involve a small startup considering the adoption of a new marketing technology. Suppose the startup estimates the potential increase in sales from the new tool as valued at $50,000, but the cost of implementing and maintaining the technology is $40,000. Since benefits ($50,000) surpass costs ($40,000), the decision to adopt the technology would be rational. The startup gains a net benefit of $10,000, which aligns with rational economic decision-making principles.

3. Production possibility frontiers and beyond

Two producers with distinct PPFs for wheat and rice operate within the confines of their respective technological and resource constraints. These frontiers illustrate the maximum possible outputs given their current resources. Under the assumption of fixed resources and technology, they cannot produce beyond their PPFs—these are the limits of their productive capacity. To go beyond, they would need either an improvement in technology, an increase in resources, or both.

However, if both producers specialize and engage in trade, they can consume beyond their individual frontiers. This phenomenon, known as gains from trade, allows each producer to focus on producing the good where they have a comparative advantage, thus increasing overall consumption possibilities beyond their respective PPFs. Nevertheless, if they choose to produce more than their maximum capacities without technological progress or resource augmentation, they cannot sustain such production levels in the long run. Therefore, without external improvements, going beyond the PPF is impossible within their current constraints, though trade can enable consumption beyond individual production limits.

Conclusion

The analysis of PPFs provides essential insights into resource allocation, opportunity costs, and economic efficiency. The ability to shift the frontier outward through technological progress emphasizes the importance of innovation and investment in economic growth. Rational decision-making principles reinforce that benefits must outweigh costs for actions to be justified, promoting optimal resource utilization. Lastly, while individual producers face hard limits on production, trade offers a pathway to surpass these bounds in consumption, illustrating the interconnected nature of economic activity and growth potential.

References

• Krugman, P., Melitz, M., & Obstfeld, M. (2018). International Economics (11th ed.). Pearson.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Hartley, J. L., & Harper, D. (2019). Economics for Business and Management. Routledge.
• Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. R. (2013). Macroeconomics (6th global ed.). Pearson.
• Frank, R. H. (2014). Microeconomics and Behavior (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Parkin, M. (2017). Economics (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Smith, A. (1776). The Wealth of Nations. Reprinted with commentary, 2005, Bantam Classics.
• Romer, D. (2019). Advanced Macroeconomics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economics (19th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.