Directions: Please Answer Each Of The Following Questions.

Directions Please Answer Each Of The Following Questions In A Paragra

Explain the difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage. Which is more important in determining trade patterns, absolute advantage or comparative advantage? Why?

What are the arguments in favor of trade restrictions, and what are the counterarguments? According to most economists, do any of these arguments really justify trade restrictions? Explain.

Using the graph, assume that the government imposes a $1 tariff on hammers. Answer the following questions given this information. a. What is the domestic price and quantity demanded of hammers after the tariff is imposed? b. What is the quantity of hammers imported before the tariff? c. What is the quantity of hammers imported after the tariff? d. What would be the amount of consumer surplus before the tariff? e. What would be the amount of consumer surplus after the tariff? f. What would be the amount of producer surplus before the tariff? g. What would be the amount of producer surplus after the tariff? h. What would be the amount of government revenue because of the tariff? i. What would be the total amount of deadweight loss due to the tariff?

Sample Paper For Above instruction

The concepts of absolute advantage and comparative advantage are fundamental to understanding international trade economics. Absolute advantage refers to the ability of a country or firm to produce a good using fewer resources than another entity. For example, if Country A can produce 10 units of textiles with 5 labor hours, and Country B can produce only 6 units with the same 5 hours, then Country A has an absolute advantage in textile production. In contrast, comparative advantage considers relative efficiencies; it focuses on opportunity costs. A country has a comparative advantage in producing a good if it can do so at a lower opportunity cost than others. For instance, even if Country A is more efficient across all goods, it might have a comparative advantage in textiles if its opportunity cost of producing textiles is lower than that of other goods. When determining trade patterns, comparative advantage is more significant because it highlights the relative benefits countries can gain from specialization and trade. Economies tend to benefit more when they specialize based on comparative advantage, leading to increased efficiency and mutual gains, while absolute advantage alone does not necessarily result in optimal trade decisions.

Trade restrictions, such as tariffs, quotas, and bans, are often justified through several arguments. These include protecting domestic industries from international competition, safeguarding national security, protecting jobs, and preserving cultural identity. Advocates argue that such measures can help nascent industries develop or prevent unfair trade practices like dumping. However, opponents counter that trade restrictions typically lead to higher prices for consumers, inefficiencies, and retaliation by trading partners, which can harm exports and overall economic growth. Most economists agree that these arguments rarely justify imposing trade restrictions because they tend to reduce overall welfare and distort market outcomes. Instead, they promote inefficiencies and often benefit protected industries at the expense of consumers. Economies generally prefer free trade policies that maximize comparative advantages, leading to a more efficient allocation of resources and increased prosperity.

Assuming a graph shows the market for hammers, with a government-imposed $1 tariff, we analyze the effect on prices and quantities. After the tariff, the domestic price of hammers would rise by $1, reflecting the increased cost to importers. Consequently, the quantity demanded would decrease as the higher price discourages consumers from buying as many hammers. Before tariffs, the quantity of imports is determined where the domestic supply and demand intersect the world price; after the tariff, import quantity diminishes because the higher price makes importing less attractive. Consumer surplus declines since consumers face higher prices and buy fewer hammers. Producer surplus increases as domestic producers sell more at higher prices. The government revenue from the tariff equals the tariff rate multiplied by the quantity of imports after the tariff. The deadweight loss represents the loss of mutual welfare due to decreased consumption and production efficiency, including the reduction in consumer surplus and the missed gains from trade that no longer occur.

References

• Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International Economics (11th ed.). Pearson.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. R. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (2015). Economics: Principles and Policy (13th ed.). Pearson.
• Hufbauer, G. C., & Schott, J. J. (2005). US Trade Policy: Protecting Manufacturing and Jobs? Peterson Institute for International Economics.
• Corden, W. M. (2013). Trade Policy and Economic Welfare. Oxford University Press.
• Helpman, E. (2018). Understanding Trade. Harvard University Press.
• Krugman, P. R., Melitz, M. J., & Obstfeld, M. (2015). International Economics: Theory and Policy (10th ed.). Pearson.
• Irwin, D. A. (1996). Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton University Press.
• Rodrik, D. (2018). Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sroeconomy. Princeton University Press.