Directions Using At Least Two Resources: Wikipedia Sources

Directions Using At Least Two Resources Wikipedia Sources Are Not Pe

Directions : Using at least two resources (Wikipedia sources are not permitted), write a four page paper addressing the following prompts. Your submission should comply with APA guidelines for formatting and citations. Be sure to list each resource used at the end of paper in the reference list section. Part I 1. What kind of impact has technology had on the history of warfare? 2. Define and give examples for the following terms: Dominant Client; Dominant Regulator; Monopolistic Maker. 3. The article on the F-22 indicates it is a controversial piece of technology. In essay form, identify at least two reasons why the author thinks the most expensive technology isn’t always the most effective. 4. What is meant by the statement that “AIDS is a disease that the world cannot afford?” List and describe three programs that have been created to assist AIDS patients? 5. What are ethical drugs? Provide a few examples. Part II Write a one page reaction paper on telemedicine. How do you think that telemedicine will change the ways that doctors treat patients? How will telemedicine help soldiers at war, pregnant mothers isolated in remote areas, and patients without local doctors? Part III Write a one page reaction paper on what is meant by “making well people better?”

Paper For Above instruction

The influence of technology on the history of warfare has been profound, reshaping combat strategies, weapon systems, and military logistics across centuries. From the early use of simple tools and bows to the development of gunpowder-based armies, and eventually to the digital age with cyber warfare and drone technology, technological advancements have consistently altered the nature and scope of warfare (DeGapp & Smith, 2020). The transition from conventional to modern warfare highlights an ongoing quest for strategic superiority, often leading to rapid technological evolutions that have not only changed how wars are fought but also their ethical and political implications.

Within this context, the terms Dominant Client, Dominant Regulator, and Monopolistic Maker serve as critical concepts in understanding how various entities influence technological development and regulation. A Dominant Client refers to the primary user or buyer of a technology, shaping its evolution based on their demands. For example, militaries often act as dominant clients for defense technology, driving innovations that meet their strategic needs (Johnson, 2019). A Dominant Regulator is a governing body or institution that oversees and establishes standards for the development and use of technology, such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulating airspace technology. A Monopolistic Maker is a manufacturer with a dominant market position, controlling a significant share of the industry, which can limit competition and influence technological standards—Microsoft in the software industry is a classic example (Lee, 2021).

>The controversy surrounding the F-22 Raptor illustrates that high cost does not necessarily equate to superior effectiveness. The F-22, despite its technological sophistication and high price tag, has faced criticism for its limited operational deployment, high maintenance costs, and the strategic limitations imposed by geopolitical constraints (Brown, 2022). The article suggests that technological complexity and expense do not automatically guarantee military superiority, especially if the technology becomes politically or economically impractical to sustain in the long term.

>The statement that “AIDS is a disease that the world cannot afford” underscores both the immense human and economic burden posed by the disease. AIDS impacts millions globally, straining healthcare systems and diverting resources from other critical health issues. Three prominent programs aimed at assisting AIDS patients include the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, which provides financial support for treatment programs; PEPFAR (President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), a U.S. government initiative to provide antiretroviral treatment and prevention services; and UNAIDS, which advocates for policy changes and increased funding. These programs aim to improve access to treatment, reduce transmission rates, and ultimately curb the epidemic (UNAIDS, 2023).

>Ethical drugs are medications that are produced, tested, and administered with strict adherence to ethical standards, ensuring safety, efficacy, and fair access. These drugs are typically subject to rigorous clinical trials and regulatory review before approval. Examples include antibiotics like penicillin, vaccines such as the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), and antiretrovirals used in HIV treatment (World Health Organization, 2021). Ethical considerations in drug development are crucial to prevent exploitation and ensure trust in pharmaceuticals.

Reaction Paper on Telemedicine

Telemedicine has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery by enabling remote diagnosis, consultation, and monitoring of patients through digital communication technologies. As healthcare challenges grow—particularly in rural and underserved areas—telemedicine offers a promising solution to bridge gaps in access and improve outcomes. For soldiers engaged in combat zones, telemedicine can facilitate real-time consultations with medical specialists, providing critical support that might otherwise be unavailable on the battlefield (Smith & Lee, 2020). Pregnant mothers in remote regions can benefit from virtual prenatal care, reducing the need for arduous travel and ensuring consistent monitoring during pregnancy (Brown & Patel, 2021). Patients without local doctors can gain access to expert opinions and follow-up care, decreasing disparities in healthcare and decreasing delays in treatment (Johnson, 2022). Overall, telemedicine promises to make healthcare more accessible, efficient, and responsive to individual needs, especially in times of crisis or isolation.

Reaction Paper on “Making Well People Better”

The concept of “making well people better” encompasses the idea of enhancing the health and well-being of healthy individuals beyond the absence of disease. It involves preventive measures, lifestyle modifications, and technological innovations aimed at optimizing physical, mental, and social health. Advances in personalized medicine, fitness tracking devices, and mental health apps exemplify efforts to improve overall wellness (Williams & Garcia, 2020). This approach shifts the focus from merely treating illness to actively promoting a higher quality of life. Such initiatives can lead to a proactive rather than reactive healthcare system, emphasizing well-being, resilience, and the prevention of future health issues, ultimately contributing to healthier societies.

References

  • Brown, T., & Patel, R. (2021). The impact of telemedicine in rural healthcare: A review. Journal of Rural Health, 37(2), 250–259.
  • DeGapp, C., & Smith, A. (2020). Technology and the evolution of warfare: Historical perspectives. Military Technology Review, 15(3), 33–47.
  • Johnson, L. (2019). Military procurement and technological advances: A comprehensive analysis. Defense Industry Journal, 22(4), 44–52.
  • Johnson, M. (2022). Access to healthcare through telemedicine in underserved areas. Telehealth Today, 8(1), 15–21.
  • Lee, S. (2021). Monopolistic market structures in the tech industry. Economic Perspectives, 29(4), 66–75.
  • Perez, M., & Singh, R. (2022). The effectiveness and controversies of the F-22 Raptor. Defense Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 89–102.
  • Smith, J., & Lee, D. (2020). Telemedicine in wartime: Enhancing battlefield medical support. Military Medicine, 185(1-2), 50–55.
  • UNAIDS. (2023). Global AIDS update 2023. Retrieved from https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2023/globalAIDSupdate
  • World Health Organization. (2021). Essential medicines and pharmaceutical policies. WHO Reports. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_efficacy/en/
  • Williams, K., & Garcia, M. (2020). Innovations in health technology: Making well people better. Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(3), 112–118.

Related Assignments