Directions With Your Chosen Scenario In Mind Address The Ass

Directions with Your Chosen Scenario In Mind Address The Assignment Pr

Describe how environmental systems in use in your chosen scenario impact human behavior.

Consider ecosystems, cultural systems, and organizational systems in your response. Describe the impact of the current resource use on the environment. What resources does the group in your scenario use? What is the impact on the environment? Describe how human ideology impacts behavior regarding environmental systems.

What policies or visions impact the environmental systems in use within your chosen group? Think about your chosen group. What behaviors do they practice regarding the environmental systems? Explain the role of cultural bias in your chosen group’s approach to global sustainability. What are some of the biases within the group that impact the use of the resources discussed in the scenario?

Paper For Above instruction

The interconnectedness of human behavior and environmental systems is a central theme in understanding sustainability within diverse communities. In the context of the Environmental Quality Club at a local college, this relationship becomes particularly salient given their focus on improving indoor air quality and promoting sustainable practices on campus. The influence of environmental systems on human behavior manifests through collective actions driven by awareness, policy, and cultural attitudes, which in turn impact resource use and ecological health.

Environmental systems encompass natural elements like air, water, and soil, as well as built systems such as ventilation and building materials. The case study from the Faculty of Civil Engineering at the Technical University of Kosice highlights how indoor environmental quality (IEQ) significantly affects health and productivity. The presence of asbestos, mold, and inadequate ventilation directly influences the behaviors of students and staff, who experience discomfort or health issues that can lead to absenteeism and decreased concentration. These behaviors are shaped by the perceived safety and comfort in the environment, which are affected by the maintenance and design of the indoor spaces.

Resource use within this scenario primarily involves construction and renovation materials, energy consumption for climate control systems, and maintenance efforts aimed at indoor air quality. The ongoing neglect of hazards like asbestos reflects a prioritization of limited financial resources over health and sustainability. Such choices underscore how economic constraints influence environmental outcomes, often leading to increased health risks and environmental degradation over time. The impact on the environment includes the release of hazardous materials into the air and the inefficient use of energy resources for climate control, which contributes to broader ecological issues such as climate change.

Human ideology, including cultural perceptions and values, plays a critical role in shaping behaviors related to environmental systems. The college’s lack of a formal sustainability plan reveals a cultural bias towards short-term budget considerations rather than long-term health and environmental stewardship. This bias is apparent in policy neglect towards renovation and environmental safety, reflecting a worldview where immediate costs are prioritized over sustainability. Conversely, the growing global emphasis on green building standards and preventative maintenance indicates a shift towards valuing environmental health as integral to organizational success.

Policies and visions surrounding environmental quality significantly impact how the college community interacts with environmental systems. In this scenario, the absence of a comprehensive sustainability or indoor air quality management plan demonstrates how policy gaps can perpetuate environmental hazards. Implementing policies that mandate regular assessment and remediation of hazardous materials would promote healthier indoor environments. Moreover, aligning institutional policies with global sustainability standards, such as LEED certification, could foster environmentally responsible behaviors.

Cultural bias within the college community may influence perceptions of environmental priorities. A bias towards cost-saving measures often results in delayed renovations and overlooking environmental hazards, which perpetuate health risks. Additionally, there may be a bias that indoor air quality issues are less urgent than other campus needs, which diminishes the urgency of sustainable interventions. Recognizing and addressing these biases requires education and leadership that emphasizes the intrinsic value of sustainability and health. Promoting a culture that integrates environmental responsibility into institutional values can mitigate biases and foster proactive sustainability measures.

Ultimately, the case study underscores the importance of understanding the intricate relationship between environmental systems and human behavior. Moving forward, the Environmental Quality Club can serve as a catalyst for change by advocating for policies rooted in sustainability, fostering awareness about cultural biases, and encouraging behaviors that support long-term environmental health. Education campaigns, policy reforms, and community engagement are crucial strategies to align human actions with ecological stewardship, ensuring that campus environments are safe, healthy, and sustainable for future generations.

References

• Becker, C., & Van-Riemsdijk, M. (2018). Indoor air quality and its impact on health and productivity in educational settings. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(7), 770-776.
• Dziedzic, P., & Jermuk, M. (2019). The role of organizational policies in promoting sustainability in educational institutions. Journal of Sustainability Education, 21, 45-59.
• Goswami, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Cultural influences on environmental attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Culture and Society, 6(3), 217-229.
• Li, X., & He, Y. (2021). The impact of economic constraints on sustainable building practices. Building and Environment, 189, 107525.
• Smith, K. (2017). The importance of environmental education for sustainable development. Sustainability, 9(11), 2031.
• United States Green Building Council. (2020). LEED certification: Promoting sustainable building design. USGBC. https://www.usgbc.org
• World Health Organization. (2018). Indoor air pollution and health. WHO. https://www.who.int
• Yilmaz, A., & Altin, S. (2019). Organizational behavior and environmental policy implementation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(4), 243–255.
• Zhang, L., & Chen, Q. (2022). Mitigating indoor air pollution through natural ventilation strategies. Building Simulation, 15(2), 231-245.
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2015). Sustainable development goals and environmental health. UNEP. https://www.unep.org