Discussing Several Strategies For International Competition

Discusses Several Strategies For Competing Internationally Some Of Th

Discusses several strategies for competing internationally, some of the benefits of entering foreign markets, and using location to build competitive advantage. However, there are also many inherent risks when operating in foreign markets. Two key risks for firms operating in the global economy are: The risk of adverse exchange rate shifts on financial performance. The risk of tariffs imposed by some countries that impact the cost of goods sold and/or transferred. Companies can decide to either ignore the impact of exchange rate changes and tariffs, or attempt to adapt their strategies and decisions to try to capitalize on favorable exchange rate changes and tariffs and minimize the adverse impact of unfavorable exchange rate changes and tariffs.

Paper For Above instruction

The global footwear industry is characterized by intense competition, diverse consumer preferences, and complex international supply chains. As firms navigate this environment, they employ various international strategies to achieve competitive advantage, manage market entry, and optimize their operations across borders. A critical aspect of international strategy involves understanding and managing exchange rate fluctuations and tariffs, which directly influence profitability and cost structures.

In the context of the footwear industry, adopting a "passive" approach to exchange rates—where companies do not actively hedge or strategically respond to currency fluctuations—has specific advantages and disadvantages. This approach entails accepting the prevailing exchange rates without attempting to predict or mitigate their impacts. Conversely, firms can also leverage geographic differences in import tariffs to gain competitive advantages, but this entails certain risks that must be carefully managed.

Advantages of a Passive Approach to Exchange Rates in the Footwear Industry

1. Cost Simplicity: A passive approach simplifies financial management by avoiding complex hedging strategies. Companies can focus on core business activities such as product design, marketing, and distribution without the additional complexity of offsetting currency risks. This is particularly advantageous for small to medium-sized footwear firms with limited resources for sophisticated currency risk management.
2. Potential for Favorable Currency Movements: If a company’s home currency appreciates against foreign currencies, unwanted currency risks are avoided, potentially resulting in higher profit margins. When exchange rates move favorably, passive firms can benefit from increased competitiveness without active adjustments, especially if they operate in markets with volatile currencies.

Disadvantages of a Passive Approach to Exchange Rates

1. Exposure to Currency Risk: Without active hedging, firms are vulnerable to adverse exchange rate movements that can erode profit margins. For instance, if the domestic currency depreciates significantly against foreign currencies, the cost of imported raw materials or components (such as leather or synthetic materials used in footwear) rises, increasing production costs.
2. Unpredictable Financial Performance: Relying on passive strategies exposes firms to volatility, making financial outcomes difficult to forecast and plan for. Sudden shifts in currency values can lead to unexpected losses or profit swings, complicating budgeting and strategic decision-making.

Leveraging Geographic Differences in Import Tariffs

1. Tariff Arbitrage: Companies can strategically source components or assemble footwear in countries with lower import tariffs to reduce overall costs. For example, a firm might source leather or synthetic materials from countries with favorable trade agreements, thereby lowering import duties and enhancing profit margins.
2. Market Entry Exploitation: Footwear firms can enter markets where tariffs are relatively low or where free trade agreements exist, making it more cost-effective to sell products locally. This can enable firms to competitively price their footwear in target markets without sacrificing margins.

Key Risks of Relying on Geographic Tariff Strategies

1. Tariff Policy Changes: Governments periodically revise trade policies, increasing tariffs or imposing new trade barriers. Sudden increases in tariffs can negate cost savings and reduce competitive advantage, resulting in higher prices and potentially decreased sales.
2. Supply Chain Disruptions: Over-reliance on specific countries for low-tariff imports can create vulnerabilities. Political instability, trade disputes, or disruptions (e.g., pandemics, natural disasters) in key supplier countries can impact the supply chain, leading to delays and higher costs.

Overall, while passive management of exchange rates and strategic use of geographic-based tariffs can provide competitive advantages in the footwear industry, they carry significant risks. Firms must weigh the benefits of cost savings and market access against exposure to volatility and policy changes. Effective international strategy involves balancing these factors, often incorporating active risk management techniques, such as currency hedging and flexible sourcing strategies, to mitigate potential downsides and sustain long-term competitiveness.

References

• Banerjee, S., & Kedia, B. (2018). International strategic management. Journal of Business Research, 92, 162-171.
• Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining Global Strategy: Crossing Borders in a Transformed World. Harvard Business School Publishing.
• Hill, C. W. L. (2014). International Business: Competing in the Global Marketplace. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Klein, P., & Frazier, G. (1997). The impact of exchange rate movements on international trade: The case of U.S. footwear imports. Journal of International Economics, 43(3-4), 537-565.
• Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, Measurement, and Reporting. Brookings Institution Press.
• Mole, K. (2017). Supply chain risk management and the footwear industry. International Journal of Logistics Management, 28(2), 678-695.
• Roe, M. J., & Baker, D. (2007). The impact of trade policies on footwear industry competitiveness. World Economy, 30(7), 1135-1154.
• Sweeney, R. J., & Polonsky, M. (2016). International Marketing Strategy. Routledge.
• Verhagen, A., & Reuver, M. (2020). Strategic management of tariffs and trade policies in global industries. Journal of International Business Policy, 3, 109-125.
• Yip, G. S. (2003). Total global strategy: Managing for worldwide competitive advantage. Pearson Education.