Discussion 1: Organizational Control Process Analysis

Discussion 1organizational Control Processanalyze How The Four Steps O

Discuss the four steps of the control process and explain how each step contributes to the control function. Describe the three types of controls and how the effectiveness of controls can be assessed in an organization, noting whether this assessment differs for a global organization. Incorporate the role of budgets in the control process.

Paper For Above instruction

The control process is an essential function within management that ensures organizational activities align with set standards and objectives. It involves a systematic approach to monitoring performance and implementing corrective actions when necessary. This process typically comprises four integral steps: establishing performance standards, measuring actual performance, comparing performance against standards, and taking corrective action. Additionally, understanding the types of controls—preliminary, screening, and feedback—is vital to appreciating how organizations maintain efficiency and effectiveness.

The first step, establishing performance standards, entails defining clear, measurable benchmarks derived from organizational goals and strategic plans. This step provides the foundation for monitoring and evaluation, guiding what performance levels are acceptable and what require improvement. For instance, budgets serve as an essential performance standard by indicating expected financial outputs and resource management levels. Through effective planning and setting appropriate standards, an organization creates a benchmark for subsequent assessments.

The second step, measuring performance, involves collecting data to ascertain how well the organization, team, or individual is performing relative to the standards. This measurement process can include financial reports, productivity data, customer satisfaction surveys, or other relevant metrics. Regular performance measurement ensures that deviations from the plan are identified promptly and accurately. For example, financial statements and variance analysis provide critical insights into discrepancies between planned budgets and actual expenditures, facilitating timely interventions.

The third step involves comparing actual performance with established standards. This comparison determines whether the organization is on track, exceeding expectations, or lagging behind. Outcomes such as exceeding, meeting, slightly missing, or significantly missing standards help in diagnosing issues. The comparison results inform decisions on whether corrective actions are needed. For instance, if expenses are running over budget, managers can investigate the causes and implement measures to realign spending with financial goals.

The final step, deciding on corrective actions, encompasses analyzing deviations and determining appropriate responses. This proactive approach may involve reallocating resources, revising procedures, or providing additional training. Critical to this step is feedback, which ensures continuous improvement. Feedback controls focus on outputs and outcomes, particularly financial results, and establish mechanisms to adjust operations accordingly. In the context of budgets, this might involve reallocating funds or revising forecasts based on performance data.

The three types of controls—preliminary, screening, and feedback—offer layered mechanisms to maintain organizational performance. Preliminary controls aim to prevent problems before they occur, such as setting up proper resource allocation and planning procedures. For example, budgets serve as preliminary controls by limiting expenses and guiding resource use from the outset. Screening controls focus on monitoring ongoing activities and identifying issues early, such as regular financial audits or quality checks. Feedback controls revolve around assessing completed activities, learning from outcomes, and implementing improvements, exemplified by profit analysis or customer feedback.

Assessing the effectiveness of controls involves evaluating whether the organization achieves its goals efficiently and effectively. Regular audits, performance reviews, and variance analyses help organizations measure control success. A critical aspect is the adaptability of controls to changing circumstances. For a global organization, this assessment becomes more complex due to contextual differences in operational environments, economic conditions, or regulatory frameworks. Global organizations must adapt control measures for diverse cultural and economic contexts, requiring more sophisticated assessment tools, such as multinational financial audits or cross-border compliance checks.

Budgets play a pivotal role in the control process by serving as financial benchmarks. They facilitate performance measurement, support decision-making, and provide a basis for variance analysis. In multinational corporations, budgets must incorporate currency fluctuations, differing taxation policies, and varied economic conditions, making their management and assessment more intricate. Therefore, while the fundamental control process remains the same, the scope and complexity expand in a global context.

In conclusion, the control process is vital to organizational success, providing a structured framework for setting standards, measuring performance, comparing results, and implementing corrective actions. The integration of budgets enhances this process by offering quantitative benchmarks. For global organizations, the control process must be adaptable to diverse environments, requiring more comprehensive assessment and flexible control mechanisms to ensure organizational objectives are achieved worldwide.

References

  • Bierman, G., Ferrell, O.C., & Ferrell, L. (2016). Business and Administrative Management. Thomson South-Western.
  • Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Harvard University Press.
  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Balanced Scorecards. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
  • Anthony, R. N., & Govindarajan, V. (2007). Management Control Systems. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99-109.
  • Otley, D. (1994). Management control in contemporary organizations: Towards a wider framework. Management Accounting Research, 5(3-4), 289-299.
  • Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2012). Management Control Systems. Pearson.
  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of Control: How Managers Use Balanced Scorecards. Harvard Business School Press.
  • Drury, C. (2013). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage Learning.

Related Assignments