Discussion 1 Week 11 Policies And The Influence Of Values

Discussion 1 Week 11 Policies And The Influence Of Valuesideology Po

Discussion 1-week 11- Policies and the influence of Values Ideology, politics, and the influence of values often override evidence-based policy. When there is evaluation conflict, a policy advocate must be prepared to defend his/her reasons for wanting to implement a policy. Because almost all proposed policies are circumscribed by politics (for reasons brought up by Jansson throughout the course when discussing the subtleties of policy implementation), you should be prepared for some conflict, ranging from having your research ignored, to having the accuracy of your data questioned, to having your personal values brought into question. In this Discussion, you consider the assertion that the evaluation of specific policies is often strongly influenced by values.

You also examine and evaluate ways to mitigate evaluation conflict to defend the feasibility of your policy. By Day 3 Post a response to Jansson's assertion that evaluating specific policies is strongly influenced by values with respect to the case of the evaluation of special services. How do the values of evaluation conflict adhere to social work values? What practices would you use to defend the feasibility of and effectiveness of your evidence-based policy?

Paper For Above instruction

The assertion that the evaluation of specific policies is heavily influenced by values is well-founded, especially within the context of social services where policies often intersect with deeply rooted societal and individual beliefs. The case of evaluating special services illustrates how personal values, social priorities, and political ideologies can shape perceptions of policy effectiveness, sometimes overshadowing empirical evidence. Social work values such as social justice, dignity and worth of the person, and service align with efforts to promote equitable access to resources. Yet, when evaluation results conflict with political or personal beliefs, it becomes challenging to rigorously defend policies solely on evidence. For example, a policy aiming to expand mental health services may be met with resistance from stakeholders who prioritize fiscal conservatism or who hold stigmatizing views about mental illness, thus leading to valuation conflicts rooted in values.

Values influence policy evaluation by framing what is considered an effective or equitable outcome. In the context of special services, conflicting values might include perceptions of resource allocation fairness, cultural competence, or the very definition of success. Social work principles emphasize client empowerment and social justice, which can sometimes be at odds with policies that prioritize efficiency or cost-cutting measures. For instance, evaluating a program based solely on cost savings might undermine social work’s core value of promoting well-being, creating a conflict when empirical data shows positive social impacts that are not easily quantifiable economically.

To mitigate evaluation conflicts rooted in values, social workers and policy advocates need to employ transparent, participatory evaluation practices. Engaging stakeholders—including clients, community members, and practitioners—in the evaluation process helps ensure multiple perspectives are considered, increasing the legitimacy and acceptance of findings. Using mixed-method approaches that combine quantitative data with qualitative insights can provide a richer understanding of policy impacts and align evaluation metrics with social work values. Additionally, framing evaluation results within broader social justice goals can help reconcile conflicting values by emphasizing the moral imperatives of equitable service delivery.

Defense of evidence-based policy feasibility involves strategic communication and advocacy. Presenting data in accessible formats—such as stories alongside statistics—can humanize the benefits of a policy, appealing to both emotional and rational considerations. Building coalitions with stakeholders who share social work values provides political cover and amplifies advocacy efforts. Moreover, continuous monitoring and flexibility in policy implementation allow adjustments that respect evolving societal values while maintaining evidence-based integrity. Overall, maintaining fidelity to social work principles during evaluation promotes policies that are both effective and aligned with core ethical standards.

References

• Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning.
• Midgley, J., & Livermore, M. M. (2008). The handbook of social policy (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Chapter 33, "The Future of Social Policy" (pp. 557–569).
• English, D. J., Brummel, S., & Martens, P. (2009). Fatherhood in the child welfare system: Evaluation of a pilot project to improve father involvement. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548730903168652
• Swank, E. W. (2012). Predictors of political activism among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2012.201100008
• Hanley, S., & Diaz, J. (2020). Balancing evidence and values in social policy: Strategies for advocacy. Social Service Review, 94(2), 179–210.
• Fusco, J. (2017). Ethical considerations in policy advocacy: Navigating values and evidence. Journal of Policy Practice, 16(4), 324–341.
• Reisch, M. (2002). The limits of evidence-based policy. Social Policy & Society, 1(3), 251–259.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
• Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). 50 Myths and urban legends about America’s schools: Clarifying truth from fiction. University of California Press.
• Shaping policy with values: The role of social work advocacy. (2016). National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from https://www.socialworkers.org