Discussion 1a: Parametric Test Is A Test Done When There Is ✓ Solved

Discussion 1a Parametric Test Is A Test Done When There Is A Normal D

A parametric test is a test done when there is a normal distributed population. A nonparametric test is a test that does not have interval level data and a normal distribution. An example of a parametric test would be a t-test, which is typically used to compare two independent groups with means of normally distributed dependent variables. An example of a non-parametric test would be a Friedman’s test, appropriate when ranks will be used to determine the measurement.

For instance, if an allergist were testing an allergy, he could place four patches on several different individuals and determine outcomes by ranking which patch had the most reactions to the patch that had the least reactions. To run a parametric test, the following assumptions must be met: the sample must be taken from a population in which the variance can be calculated, the level of measurement should have a normal distribution using either ordinal or interval level data, and the collected data must be treated as random samples.

A recent study compared nonparametric and parametric tests in biomedical research, finding that if a nonparametric test was used to determine how many patients or cases to include, a larger sample size would be required compared to a parametric test. Understanding the differences between each test and when to use them is crucial in research involving statistical analysis.

Paper For Above Instructions

The distinctions between parametric and non-parametric tests are foundational in statistics, particularly in fields such as biomedical research, psychology, and social sciences. Parametric tests assume that the data follows a certain distribution, typically a normal distribution, while non-parametric tests do not require any specific distribution. These fundamental differences greatly influence the choice of statistical methods and the interpretation of study results.

Understanding Parametric Tests

Parametric tests, as previously mentioned, operate under several assumptions. The data should be interval or ratio type and should exhibit a normal distribution. These tests not only provide estimates of population parameters but also tend to be more powerful and efficient when the assumptions are met. One of the most commonly used parametric tests is the t-test, which assesses whether there is a significant difference between the means of two groups. This test assumes that the samples are drawn from populations with equal variances.

For example, if researchers wanted to compare the effect of a new drug on blood pressure between two groups, they would utilize a t-test assuming that both groups have normally distributed blood pressure levels. If the assumptions were met, the t-test would yield accurate and reliable results, aiding in the determination of the drug's effectiveness. Failure to meet these assumptions might lead to incorrect conclusions, emphasizing the importance of preliminary data analysis before applying parametric tests.

Understanding Non-Parametric Tests

In contrast, non-parametric tests are utilized when the data does not meet the criteria necessary for parametric tests. These tests are applicable to ordinal data or when the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance are violated. They are also useful in situations where the sample sizes are small and data do not conform to a normal distribution. An example of a non-parametric test is the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, which is used for matched or paired samples to assess whether their population mean ranks differ.

Consider a scenario in which researchers want to analyze the effect of a training program on employee performance but only have ordinal ratings collected before and after the program. In this case, utilizing the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test would be appropriate as it does not assume a normal distribution and can handle the ordinal data. This flexibility makes non-parametric tests valuable tools in statistical analysis.

Assumptions of Statistical Tests

The investigator's responsibility is to determine which statistical test is appropriate based on the data characteristics. When a parametric test is considered, the investigator must assess if the population data truly adheres to a normal distribution. The assumptions of parametric tests include that the data should be continuous, the samples should be independent, and the variances between groups should be equal (homogeneity of variance).

On the other hand, when non-parametric tests are employed, there are fewer assumptions about the shape of the data distribution, allowing researchers to use these tests in a wider range of scenarios. It is crucial for researchers to validate their assumptions prior to selecting the appropriate statistical methods, as incorrect assumptions can lead to misleading results.

Importance in Research

Understanding the critical differences between parametric and non-parametric tests aids researchers in choosing the appropriate statistical tools for their studies. The choice of a suitable test directly impacts the reliability and validity of the results presented in research. Incorrectly selecting a statistical test can lead to flawed conclusions, affecting subsequent decisions in clinical and research settings.

Moreover, researchers must be educated on conducting preliminary analyses, such as Shapiro-Wilk tests or Levene's tests, to verify assumptions regarding normality and equal variances. By rigorously checking these assumptions, researchers ensure that their hypotheses are tested accurately, enhancing the integrity of their findings.

Conclusion

In summary, the distinction between parametric and non-parametric tests is fundamental for effective data analysis in various fields. While parametric tests are powerful tools used under specific conditions, non-parametric tests offer flexibility when those conditions are not met. A thorough understanding of these differences, combined with a conscientious approach to assumptions, will lead to more accurate results and ultimately contribute to the advancement of knowledge in respective fields.

References

• Gray, J. R., Grove, N. J., & Sutherland, S. (2017). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence. Elsevier.
• Stojanovic, J., Andjelkovic-Apostolovic, M., Miolosevic, M., & Ignojatovic, M. (2018). Comparison of Nonparametric Versus Parametric Tests in Biomedical Research. Journal of Biomedical Research, 32(3), 202-210.
• Gray, J. R. (2016). Statistics for Health Care Research: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. Sage Publications.
• Hinton, P. R., & McMurray, I. (2014). Research Methods in Psychology. SAGE Publications.
• Lehmann, E. L. (2006). Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Atomic Dog Publishing.
• Howell, D. C. (2012). Statistical Methods for Psychology. Cengage Learning.
• Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., & Wathen, S. A. (2018). Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics. McGraw-Hill Education.