Discussion 2: Risk And Resilience Many Variables Such As Wor

Discussion 2 Risk And Resiliencemany Variables Such As Work Family

Many variables, such as work, family, friends, and lifestyle, may influence the development of mental illness. Along with these variables, a client's individual variables, such as age and maturity, may also play a role in this development. Although such variables may increase a client's level of risk in the development of mental illness, conversely, they may also assist in a client's level of resilience. As a future professional in the field, it is essential to understand how variables influence the development of mental illness. For this Discussion, select a variable that contributes to risk and resilience for a client.

Think about why this variable might be considered in client diagnosis. Consider how this variable may interact with one individual variable. With these thoughts in mind: Post by Day 4 a brief description of one variable that contributes to risk and resilience of clients. Then explain why this variable is important to client diagnosis. Finally, explain how this variable might interact with one individual variable in the development of psychopathology.

Provide an example and justify your response using the current literature and Learning Resources. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources and current literature.

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding the complex interplay between risk and resilience factors is crucial for mental health professionals aiming to assess and intervene effectively with clients. Among various variables, social support stands out for its significant influence on mental health outcomes, functioning both as a buffer against stress and as a facilitator of resilience. This paper explores social support as a variable that contributes to both risk and resilience, its importance in client diagnosis, and its interaction with individual variables such as personality traits in the development of psychopathology.

Social support refers to the perception or experience of being loved, valued, and part of a social network and is associated with better mental health outcomes. According to Davydov et al. (2010), social support acts as a protective factor that enhances resilience by providing emotional resources, practical assistance, and a sense of belonging, which can mitigate the effects of stress and adversity. Conversely, deficits in social support are linked to increased vulnerability to mental illness, including depression and anxiety disorders (Cacioppo et al., 2011). Therefore, social support's dual capacity to buffer stress and promote coping makes it a significant variable worth considering in client assessment and diagnosis.

In clinical practice, evaluating a client's social support network is vital, as it can influence the course and prognosis of mental health disorders. For instance, individuals with robust social support tend to respond better to treatment and have lower symptom severity (Leyro, Zvolensky, & Bernstein, 2010). Conversely, social isolation and lack of support can exacerbate symptoms and hinder recovery. Consequently, understanding social support levels can inform treatment planning, including strategies to strengthen support networks or address social deficits—an essential component of a comprehensive diagnostic assessment.

The interaction between social support and individual personality traits exemplifies its importance in the development of psychopathology. For example, consider extraversion, a personality trait characterized by sociability, assertiveness, and positive emotionality. An extraverted individual may naturally have more extensive social networks, providing more resilience against mental illness. Conversely, introverted individuals might experience greater social isolation, increasing their vulnerability to depression or anxiety (Payton, 2009). This interaction illustrates how social support's protective effect is moderated by personal characteristics, influencing the likelihood of developing psychopathology.

An illustrative example involves a client with social anxiety disorder. Limited social support due to avoidance behaviors can reinforce feelings of loneliness and depression, exacerbating the disorder. However, therapeutic interventions aimed at gradually improving social skills and expanding support networks can enhance resilience, reducing symptom severity. This example underscores the importance of assessing social support as part of diagnosis and treatment planning, especially considering its interaction with personality traits such as social engagement and openness.

In conclusion, social support functions as a critical variable influencing mental health by serving as a buffer against stress and fostering resilience. Its consideration in client diagnosis helps identify vulnerabilities and strengths, informing tailored interventions. Recognizing how social support interacts with individual variables like personality traits further emphasizes its role in the development or mitigation of psychopathology. A comprehensive understanding of this variable enables mental health professionals to implement more effective, personalized treatment strategies that promote recovery and resilience.

References

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Reis, H. T., & Zautra, A. J. (2011). Social resilience: The value of social fitness with an application to the military. American Psychologist, 66(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021594
  • Davydov, D. M., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Chaudieu, I. (2010). Resilience and mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003
  • Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. Penguin.
  • Leyro, T. M., Zvolensk, M. J., & Bernstein, A. (2010). Distress tolerance and psychopathological symptoms and disorders: A review of the empirical literature among adults. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 576–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020019
  • Payton, A. R. (2009). Mental health, mental illness, and psychological distress: Same continuum or distinct phenomena? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 50(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650905000208
  • Pierce, J. M. (2012). Mental illness and mental health: Is the glass half empty or half full? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(11), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371205701101
  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2003). Flourishing under fire: Resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 15–36). American Psychological Association.
  • Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
  • Van Vliet, K. J. (2008). Shame and resilience in adulthood: A grounded theory study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.233
  • Wetherton, L., & Sempowski, I. P. (2018). Resilience and mental health outcomes: The role of social support and personality traits. Psychology & Health, 33(5), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2017.1321567

Related Assignments