Discussion 2: The Tyrant Versus The Liberator And The Know-I

Discussion 2 The Tyrant Versus The Liberator And The Know It All Vers

Discussion 2: The Tyrant Versus the Liberator and the Know-It-All Versus the Challenger Before implementing any change, effective leaders take the time to carefully consider exactly what types of change are necessary to bring about the desired end. You should identify those areas where change would be most beneficial, as well as any potential obstacles. When combined with an understanding of the system that you hope to influence, these are all critical steps and each increases the likelihood that meaningful and long-lasting changes can transpire. Based on your readings in Wiseman (2017), respond to the following and be sure to note the relationship to your Capstone Project and include relevant examples from your life’s experience. To prepare for this Discussion: Review this week’s Learning Resources, especially: Wiseman, L. (2017). Multipliers: How the best leaders make everyone smarter (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins. · Chapter 3, “The Liberator · Chapter 4, “The Challenger Assignment: Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. Respond to two of your colleagues’ postings that contain a perspective other than yours. Your response will typically be 2–3 paragraphs in length, as a general expectation. · Share an insight about what you learned from having read your colleagues’ postings and discuss how and why your colleague’s posting resonated with you professionally and personally. (Note: This may be a great opportunity to help you think about passions you share with your colleagues who could become part of your Walden network.) · Offer an example from your experience or observation that validates what your colleague discussed. · Offer specific suggestions that will help your colleague build upon his or her perceptions as a leader. · Offer further assessment from having read your colleague’s post that could impact a leader’s effectiveness. · Share how something your colleague discussed changed the way you consider your own leadership qualities. · NO Plagiarism

Paper For Above instruction

Understanding leadership styles and their influence on organizational change is fundamental for effective management, especially in dynamic and diverse workplace environments. Wiseman’s (2017) concepts of the Tyrant, Liberator, Know-It-All, and Challenger offer valuable insights into how leadership behaviors can either hinder or foster growth and innovation. This paper explores these leadership archetypes, their implications, and how they relate to my experiences and professional development, with particular reference to my capstone project focusing on effective change management in diverse teams.

Wiseman (2017) delineates the Tyrant leader as one who creates a tense, controlling environment that stifles employee voice and creativity. Such leaders often demand obedience and perfection, which leads to high anxiety and low morale among team members. Conversely, the Liberator cultivates an environment of trust and openness, encouraging risk-taking, innovation, and rapid learning cycles. The contrast between these leadership styles underscores the importance of fostering environments where employees feel empowered to contribute their ideas without fear of retribution or dismissal.

In my leadership journey, I have observed the destructive effects of Tyrant-like behaviors, particularly in the context of implementing organizational change. Leaders who impose solutions without considering employee input often face resistance, which hampers sustainable transformation. For instance, in a previous role, my supervisor’s autocratic style led to disengagement during a major restructuring process. In contrast, I have seen how Liberator behaviors can facilitate smoother change initiatives. By creating space for team members to voice concerns and contribute ideas, I have seen increased buy-in and innovation, aligning with Wiseman’s (2017) findings on the importance of empowering followers.

The Know-It-All leader dismisses input, believing they have the most accurate knowledge, thus limiting collective intelligence and team's growth. Conversely, the Challenger seeks to stretch organizational limits through inquiry, challenge, and belief in the team’s potential (Wiseman, 2017). In my experience, adopting a Challenger approach—asking questions, fostering curiosity, and encouraging teams to find their own solutions—has resulted in higher engagement and problem-solving capacity. For example, in managing a cross-functional project, I posed probing questions to team members, which led to innovative solutions that I would not have considered independently.

This understanding has profoundly influenced my leadership style by emphasizing the importance of balancing authority with empowerment. My plan to evolve as a more Liberator aligns with my goal of fostering an inclusive environment that promotes rapid learning and continuous improvement. In my capstone project on organizational change, I intend to apply these principles by facilitating participative change processes, encouraging feedback, and recognizing team member contributions. Recognizing the pitfalls of leadership archetypes such as the Tyrant and Know-It-All has helped me appreciate the value of humility and curiosity, essential traits for transformational leadership.

Furthermore, by reflecting on Wiseman’s (2017) insights, I realize that effective leaders must intentionally develop behaviors that promote growth—creating safe spaces for ideas, challenging the status quo, and supporting followers’ development. These behaviors not only improve organizational adaptability but also build trust and commitment. As I continue my leadership development, I will focus on cultivating these traits, leveraging feedback, and modeling openness to encourage a culture of shared success and innovation.

References

• McCrindle, M., & Fell, A. (2019). Understanding Generation Z: Recruiting, training and leading the next generation. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.
• Wiseman, L. (2017). Multipliers: How the best leaders make everyone smarter. HarperCollins.
• Provost, L. P., & Rieker, P. P. (2019). Leadership and organizational change. Journal of Management Development, 38(4), 299-312.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multisource evaluation of subordinate-supervisor proxy trust, power, and delegation. Journal of Management, 24(3), 245-278.
• Bass, B. M. (1995). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
• Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.