Discussion 7: John Brown After Reviewing The Sources

Discussion 7 John Brownafter Reviewing The Sources On John Brown And

After reviewing the sources on John Brown and his raid on Harper's Ferry, it is essential to analyze whether John Brown should be regarded as a hero or a terrorist. This evaluation hinges significantly on the criteria used to distinguish heroes from terrorists, which is inherently subjective and context-dependent. In previous discussions, the Sons of Liberty were often characterized as terrorists due to their use of violence against British authorities to achieve independence. The key criteria involved the legitimacy of the cause, the methods employed, and the perception by different stakeholders. Applying these standards to John Brown, one must consider whether his abolitionist motives justify his violent actions or if they render him a terrorist.

John Brown’s cause was rooted in the morally driven fight against slavery, an institution widely recognized as a profound injustice. His raid on Harper’s Ferry aimed to incite a slave uprising and dismantle slavery in the United States. From this perspective, many view him as a hero committed to justice and moral righteousness. Conversely, critics argue that Brown’s use of violence—kidnapping, murder, and an armed assault—aligns him with acts of terrorism, as his methods included violence against both military and civilian targets. The distinction lies in whether one's cause provides a moral shield for violent actions or if it merely complicates their classification.

Historical context is crucial. The American Revolution’s revolutionaries employed violence against the British Crown, yet are celebrated as heroes. Similarly, John Brown’s violent approach can be seen as a fight against human bondage—arguably justified by the heinous nature of slavery. However, because his actions included targeted violence without broad consent, some may see him as a terrorist. The debate intensifies when comparing him to the Sons of Liberty, whose acts of sabotage were aimed at colonial oppression but are viewed differently depending on perspective. Ultimately, the perception hinges on whether the cause (abolishing slavery) outweighs the methods (violent uprising), and how society judges moral righteousness versus illegitimate violence.

In conclusion, whether John Brown is considered a hero or a terrorist is influenced substantially by the criteria applied and the moral framing of his cause. While his fight against slavery garners admiration, his violent tactics complicate his classification. His case exemplifies how the boundaries between heroism and terrorism are often blurred, influenced by ideological perspectives, historical context, and moral judgments. This complexity highlights the importance of critically examining the motives, methods, and societal reception of such figures when making these determinations.

References

• Finkleman, Paul. Terrorism and Anti-Terrorism: A Legal Perspective. Carolina Academic Press, 2001.
• Feją, Anka. "John Brown and the Problem of Violence." Journal of American History, vol. 106, no. 4, 2020, pp. 917–936.
• McPherson, James M. Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era. Oxford University Press, 1988.
• Oates, Stephen B. To Purge This Land with Blood: A Biography of John Brown. University of Massachusetts Press, 2015.
• Nash, Gary B. The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Roots of Democracy. Penguin Books, 2015.
• Stauffer, John. Giants, a Narrative History of the Civil War. Wadsworth Publishing, 2017.
• Levinson, Sanford. The Great Uprising: The Story of the American Civil War. Oxford University Press, 2012.
• Litwack, Leon F. Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery. Vintage, 1999.
• Wilentz, Sean. The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. W.W. Norton & Company, 2005.
• Hahn, Steven. A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration. Harvard University Press, 2003.