Discussion Assignment: Deriving Organizational Culture

Discussion Assignment: Deriving Organizational Culture from Organizational Theory

Discuss how organizational theory has a direct impact on the development of organizational culture.

Paper For Above instruction

Organizational culture is a vital component of a company's identity, encompassing shared values, beliefs, behaviors, and myths that shape the environment within which employees operate. According to Siourouni, Kastanioti, Tziallas, and Niakas (2012), organizational culture manifests through various social phenomena such as dress codes, language, rituals, symbols, and modes of deference, all of which collectively define an organization's character and norms. The development of this culture is significantly influenced by organizational theories, which serve as frameworks for understanding, analyzing, and guiding organizational behavior and structure.

Organizational theories provide foundational principles that inform how organizations are structured, how they adapt to change, and how they interact with their environments. These theories not only shape organizational design but also influence the cultural norms that develop within an organization. For instance, Structural Contingency Theory suggests that organizations must align their structure with external demands and internal needs, leading to the cultivation of a culture that values flexibility and adaptability (Fiedler, 1964). Similarly, Resource Dependence Theory emphasizes the importance of external resource management, which fosters a culture of negotiation and alliance-building (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978).

Institutional Theory further impacts organizational culture by highlighting the influence of societal norms, regulations, and industry standards. Organizations often internalize these external pressures, resulting in a culture that reflects institutional conformity and legitimacy (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983). For example, healthcare organizations operating under strict regulatory environments may develop cultures that prioritize compliance and ethical standards to gain legitimacy and trust from stakeholders.

Population Ecology theory explains how organizations evolve and adapt over time through processes such as selection, retention, and variation. This leads to the development of a resilient organizational culture that emphasizes innovation or stability, depending on environmental pressures (Hannan & Freeman, 1989). For healthcare institutions, this might translate into a culture that either champions continuous improvement or maintains traditional clinical practices.

Principal-Agent Theory impacts organizational culture by addressing issues of agency and control. It highlights the importance of aligning managers' interests with those of owners and stakeholders, promoting a culture of accountability and transparency (Jensen & Meckling, 1976). In healthcare, such cultures are evident in quality assurance initiatives where staff and management work collaboratively towards common goals.

Transaction Cost Economics informs the development of a culture that values efficiency and cost-effectiveness, influencing the organization’s procedures, decision-making processes, and internal controls (Williamson, 1979). Healthcare organizations influenced by this theory may develop a culture that emphasizes prudent resource utilization and reducing waste.

Social Network Theory emphasizes the importance of inter-organizational relationships and communication channels, fostering a culture of collaboration and information sharing (Granovetter, 1985). This is particularly relevant in healthcare, where interdisciplinary teamwork and community engagement are crucial for delivering quality care.

Complexity Theory highlights the unpredictable and interconnected nature of organizational systems, encouraging a culture that is adaptive, innovative, and resilient in the face of rapid environmental changes (Uhl-Bien et al., 2007). Healthcare organizations adopting complexity-informed cultures are often more responsive to patient needs and technological advancements.

In conclusion, organizational theories critically shape the development of organizational culture by influencing norms, values, behaviors, and structural arrangements. Each theory provides unique insights into how organizations navigate their external and internal environments, and collectively, they form the blueprint for cultivating a specific organizational culture that aligns with strategic goals and contextual demands.

References

• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
• Fiedler, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 149–190.
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
• Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Harvard University Press.
• Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
• Siourouni, E., Kastanioti, C. K., Tziallas, D., & Niakas, D. (2012). Health care providers organizational culture profile: A literature review. Health Science Journal, 6(1), 212–233.
• Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the heroic to the everyday. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.
• Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.