Discussion Board Must Be Plagiarism Free And All Four Parts

Discussion Board Needs To Be Plagarism Free And All 4 Parts Must Be D

There are many avenues that companies can use to increase their capacity. Some are more permanent (hard ceiling capacity increases) some are more temporary (soft ceiling capacity increases). Suppose that you are running a company that produces a component for the automotive industry. Your current capacity is 5,000 units per week. You have calculated that you will need to increase your capacity to 7,500 units a week to meet your current demand. You are considering the following methods of increasing your capacity. The use of dedicated and flexible facilities: Your Company has several permanent storage facilities and has used temporary storage in the past. Flexible workforce: Your Company’s workforce generally works 8–5 Monday through Friday. You are considering adjusting existing workforce time structures to meet planned demand. Subcontracting: With the planned demand increasing, perhaps temporarily, subcontracting the additional resources might be an option. Product design flexibility: Your Company is considering modifying its factory production lines to be better able to handle future demand. Which of these methods would you consider a hard ceiling increase? Explain?

Among the methods considered, modifying the factory production lines for greater flexibility aligns with a hard ceiling capacity increase because it involves structural changes to the production infrastructure, resulting in a permanent elevation of production capacity. This approach typically requires significant capital investment and long-term planning, but once implemented, it provides sustained increased capacity that can accommodate future demand surges without significantly altering current processes. Conversely, increasing workforce hours or subcontracting are more aligned with soft ceiling capacity increases because they are temporary or adjustable measures that do not fundamentally alter the production capacity but allow for a short-term boost. Adjusting work hours involves extending shifts or adding overtime, which is flexible but may lead to fatigue or increased costs, and subcontracting allows for quick capacity expansion without long-term commitments but may introduce variability and quality concerns.

Considering the methods provided, a soft ceiling increase would be adjusting the existing workforce time structures and subcontracting. These techniques do not necessitate extensive changes to the company's core production facilities and can be readily scaled up or down based on demand fluctuations. Adjusting work hours can enhance capacity temporarily by utilizing overtime or additional shifts, providing agility in meeting peak demands without permanent changes to the infrastructure. Subcontracting offers flexibility and expedites capacity increases with external resources, ideal during demand spikes, albeit with potential risks related to quality control and delivery schedules. Both strategies offer short-term solutions that can be withdrawn or reduced once the increased demand stabilizes, making them suitable for managing temporary or seasonal demand increases.

In recommending the most appropriate method for capacity expansion, the choice hinges on balancing long-term sustainability with immediate needs. For a company producing automotive components, I would advocate for modifying production line flexibility as the preferred strategy because it offers a durable solution that can support sustained demand increases and improve operational efficiency over time. The advantages include a permanent capacity uplift, improved process integration, and potential cost reductions in the long run due to streamlined operations. However, the disadvantages involve significant initial capital investment, potential downtime during modifications, and a longer implementation timeline. This method also requires careful planning, as it entails capital expenditure and disruption to current operations. Nonetheless, for future-oriented growth and capacity enhancement, this approach provides the most strategic advantage by building a resilient production system capable of adapting to increasing demand sustainably.

References

• Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations Management (12th ed.). Pearson.
• Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., & Aquilano, N. J. (2019). Operations Management for Competitive Advantage (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Slack, N., Brandon-Jones, A., & Burgess, N. (2020). Operations Management (9th ed.). Pearson.
• Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations Management (13th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
• Wild, T. (2017). Principles of Operations Management. Routledge.
• Fitzsimmons, J., & Fitzsimmons, M. (2014). Service Management: Operations, Strategy, and Technology. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Meredith, J. R., & Shafer, S. M. (2019). Operations Management for MBAs. Wiley.
• Vogel, C. M. (2021). Manufacturing and Operations Strategy. CRC Press.
• Heinrich, K. (2014). Capacity Planning and Management. Springer.
• Martin, J. J. (2014). The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review Press.