Discussion For Chapter 12: It Is About Answering These Two Q

Disscution For Chapter 12it Is About Answering These Two Questionschap

Disscution for chapter 12 it is about answering these two questions chapter 12 described some methods used in the training and development process to varying degrees of success depending on the organization structure and mission or strategy. What types of T & D processes have you had experience with and to what degree of success? If you have not had experience with any of these T & D processes which of them do you feel you would be the most comfortable with and why?

Paper For Above instruction

Training and Development (T&D) processes are critical to organizational growth and employee performance enhancement. Different organizations adopt various T&D methods based on their structure, strategic objectives, and resource availability. In my professional experience, I have encountered several T&D processes, and their success varied depending on organizational alignment and implementation quality.

One prominent T&D process I have experienced is structured onboarding programs for new employees. These programs typically include orientation sessions, mentorship, and skills training tailored to the company's operational needs. In my previous role at a manufacturing firm, the onboarding process was highly successful due to its comprehensive nature and alignment with the company’s strategic goal of rapid integration and productivity boosting. The success of this process was evident in the quicker ramp-up period of new hires and increased engagement levels, which contributed positively to overall organizational performance.

Another T&D process I have been involved with is leadership development workshops. These workshops focused on enhancing managerial skills, strategic thinking, and communication abilities of mid-level managers. The success of these programs was mixed; while some managers displayed significant growth and applied new skills effectively, others showed limited improvement. The variability was largely due to differences in individual motivation and the degree of managerial support received post-training. This experience highlighted that the effectiveness of leadership development is often contingent on both participant engagement and ongoing organizational support.

Additionally, I have participated in technical skills training, such as software proficiency courses aimed at improving efficiency in data management. These sessions were generally successful because they addressed specific skill gaps directly linked to job performance, thus providing immediate value to the organization. The success of technical training often relies on targeted content, practical exercises, and ongoing reinforcement, all of which were adequately addressed in these programs.

For organizations and individuals without direct experience with these processes, I believe that I would feel most comfortable with technical skills training. This is because technical training typically involves clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and tangible skills that can be quickly applied in the workplace. Additionally, the structured nature of technical training programs offers a sense of clarity and confidence in delivering effective results. The immediate impact on job performance makes technical training more accessible for learners who prefer concrete and straightforward learning experiences.

In conclusion, the success of T&D processes is highly dependent on organizational context, strategic alignment, and the specific needs of employees. My own experiences with onboarding, leadership development, and technical skills training have provided insights into the factors that influence effectiveness. For individuals new to T&D initiatives, technical skills training is often the most approachable due to its clarity, measurable outcomes, and direct relevance to job performance. Ultimately, aligning T&D processes with organizational goals and ensuring ongoing support can significantly enhance their success and impact on organizational growth.

References

• Noe, R. A. (2020). Employee training and development. McGraw-Hill Education.
• Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Corwin Press.
• Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations. Wadsworth.
• Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63-105.
• Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74-101.
• Tharenou, P., Saks, A. M., & Moore, C. (2007). A review and critique of research on training and organizational-level outcomes. Human Resource Management Review, 17(3), 251-273.
• Arthur Jr., W., Bennett Jr., W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 227-268.
• Birdi, K., et al. (2008). The impact of human resource and operational management practices on company productivity: A longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 61(3), 467-501.
• Kaufman, R. (2016). The learning & development handbook: A practical guide for designing, delivering, and evaluating learning at work. Kogan Page.