Discussion For This Journal Task: First Use The Text In Chap ✓ Solved

Discussion 1for This Journal Task First Use The Text In Chapters 5 An

Discussion 1for This Journal Task First Use The Text In Chapters 5 An

For this journal task, first use the text in Chapters 5 and 6 of your text to guide your reflection on Carl Rogers's principle of self-concept. Applying this phenomenological concept to yourself, address the following in your journal: How much congruence do you think there is between your actual, ideal, and ought selves? How does this affect how you think, feel, and act? Briefly summarize your thoughts on Rogers's major concepts of the self, self-actualization, and unconditional positive regard. What research design(s) did Rogers use in his studies?

Do you think Rogers conducted his research ethically? Why or why not? Use examples from the textbook readings and your other research to support your thoughts.

Sample Paper For Above instruction

Introduction

In this paper, I reflect on Carl Rogers's principle of self-concept, exploring the degree of alignment among my actual, ideal, and ought selves, and analyzing how this congruence influences my thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Additionally, I provide a summary of Rogers's key concepts—self, self-actualization, and unconditional positive regard—and evaluate the ethical considerations of his research practices.

Understanding Rogers's Perspective on Self-Concept

Carl Rogers emphasized the importance of self-concept, which comprises the perceptions individuals hold about themselves. According to Rogers, the congruence or incongruence between different aspects of the self—namely, the actual, ideal, and ought selves—significantly impacts psychological well-being. The actual self refers to the attributes I believe I possess, the ideal self represents the person I aspire to be, and the ought self is related to perceived obligations or duties (Rogers, 1959). In my case, I observe a fair degree of congruence among these selves. My actual self aligns closely with my ideal self because I have set realistic goals and values that I actively pursue. The ought self, formed by societal expectations, sometimes creates tension, especially when societal pressures conflict with my personal values.

The Impact of Self-Concept Congruence on Thoughts, Feelings, and Actions

The degree of congruence influences my psychological state significantly. When my actual self is aligned with my ideal and ought selves, I experience greater self-esteem, motivation, and emotional stability. Conversely, discrepancies—such as feeling that I fall short of my ideal self—can lead to feelings of dissatisfaction or inadequacy (Rogers, 1961). For example, during periods of stress when I perceive myself as not meeting personal or societal expectations, my mood tends to decline, and my behavior may become more withdrawn. Conversely, when I actively work towards aligning my selves, I experience increased confidence and proactive engagement in tasks.

Summary of Rogers’s Major Concepts

Carl Rogers’s theory revolves around the concept of the self and the process of self-actualization, which refers to realizing one’s full potential. He argued that unconditional positive regard—a non-judgmental acceptance of oneself—fosters authentic growth (Rogers, 1961). Self-actualization is only achievable when individuals experience genuine acceptance and are free to explore their true selves without fear of rejection. Rogers believed that nurturing environments that offer unconditional positive regard facilitate this process, leading individuals toward self-fulfillment.

Research Design and Ethical Considerations

Rogers primarily employed qualitative research methods, including client-centered therapy and naturalistic case studies, to understand the processes of self-discovery and growth. His studies often involved therapeutic sessions where clients shared personal experiences, and Rogers observed changes over time (Rogers, 1951). Regarding ethics, Rogers emphasized respect, empathy, and genuine concern for clients, aligning with contemporary ethical standards. His practice of client-centered therapy prioritized informed consent, confidentiality, and non-maleficence. Evidence suggests that Rogers's approach was ethically sound, focusing on the well-being and autonomy of his clients rather than exploiting their vulnerabilities (Elliott & Greenberg, 2007).

Conclusion

In conclusion, Carl Rogers’s principles of self-concept provide valuable insight into personal growth and psychological well-being. Reflecting on my own congruence among my selves reveals significant impacts on my mental health and behavior. His research methods, rooted in empathy and respect, appear ethically justified, contributing positively to both theory and practice in psychology.

References

  • Elliott, R., & Greenberg, L. S. (2007). The evolution of experiential therapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp. 469–505). Wiley.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science. McGraw-Hill.
  • Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Corey, G. (2017). Theories and practice of counseling and psychotherapy (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Cuypers, F., & Van Ranst, P. (2017). Ethical considerations in qualitative research. Research Ethics, 13(3-4), 1–20.
  • Moon, M. (2013). Ethics in psychological research. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in psychology. Routledge.
  • Smith, J. A., & Nichols, T. (2018). Qualitative approaches in psychology. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(1), 3–12.
  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press.
  • The American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 72(9), 821–841.