Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI650_B04_202330

Discussion Grading Rubric | BUSI650_B04_202330

Evaluate the grading criteria for discussion posts within the BUSI650 course. The rubric includes standards for the quality of the main post regarding key topics, as well as responses to classmates, focusing on support through learning materials, research, and assignment requirements. It also assesses spelling, grammar, and adherence to word counts across different levels of performance, from advanced to developing. Each criterion is weighted with specific point ranges and performance descriptions to guide students in meeting expectations for quality, engagement, and communication standards.

Paper For Above instruction

In the context of academic engagement, discussion participation plays a pivotal role in fostering a vibrant learning community, especially in business courses like BUSI650. The grading rubric emphasizes not only the quality of the initial posts but also the depth and frequency of responses to peers, alongside the importance of linguistic precision and word count adherence. This comprehensive assessment structure ensures students develop critical thinking, support their arguments effectively, and communicate professionally, which seamlessly integrates with the objectives of higher education in business studies.

Regarding the criterion for the main discussion post, an "Advanced" score (50-44 points) requires strict compliance with all assignment requirements, including thorough support of major points through learn materials, pertinent research, and alignment with instructions. Achieving this level indicates a well-researched, insightful analysis clearly articulated with logical coherence. The "Proficient" level (44-40 points) reflects that most assignment requirements are met, with significant support from relevant sources, whereas the "Developing" level (0-40 points) suggests partial fulfillment with some supporting evidence, but lacking in depth or clarity.

Similarly, responses to classmates are evaluated based on the depth and support of ideas, with the "Advanced" designation (20-17 points) reserved for substantive replies to at least two classmates, thoroughly supported by course materials and research. "Proficient" responses (17-16 points) are somewhat similar but may lack the comprehensiveness of the highest tier. The "Developing" level (up to 15 points) involves responses to one or two classmates, with potentially limited support, reflecting a need for increased engagement and analysis. Notably, responses are also assessed for spelling, grammar, and word count, requiring proper language use and meeting specified word limits to ensure clarity and professionalism.

This rubric exemplifies the importance of thorough preparation, active engagement, and polished communication in academic discussions, which are essential for students’ mastery of course concepts and effective professional interactions. Aligning participation with these criteria encourages students to substantiate their ideas with credible sources, respond meaningfully to peer contributions, and maintain high standards of language accuracy, ultimately fostering a rigorous educational environment conducive to learning and growth in business disciplines.

References

• Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
• Davidson, C. N., & Witte, S. P. (2003). The digital university: A review of research on online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 4-8.
• Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-Learning in the 21st century: A community of inquiry framework. Routledge.
• Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24-32.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance education: A systems view of online learning. Cengage Learning.
• Salmon, G. (2013). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Routledge.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
• Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Press.