Discussion On Patient Preferences And Decision Making

Discussion Patient Preferences And Decision Makingchanges In Culture

Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professionals are increasingly involving patients in treatment decisions. However, this often comes with challenges, as illnesses and treatments can become complex.

What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions? In this discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement).

You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making. To prepare, review the resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan. Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute's Decision Aids Inventory, select a relevant decision aid, and consider if social determinants of health were considered in the treatment plan.

Social determinants of health include economic stability, education access, healthcare access and quality, neighborhood, and social and community context. These factors can significantly influence a patient's decision-making process.

Note: To ensure HIPAA compliance, do not use the patient’s real name or any identifiable information.

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, discuss how including these factors might impact the course of action and how they are reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the selected patient decision aid and how it might contribute to effective decision-making, both generally and based on your experience.

Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life. This reflection should help you understand the importance of shared decision-making and tools that facilitate it.

Paper For Above instruction

In modern healthcare, the paradigm shift towards shared decision-making emphasizes the importance of incorporating patient preferences, social determinants of health, and values into treatment planning. This approach not only respects patient autonomy but also aims to improve health outcomes by aligning treatment options with individual circumstances and goals. My personal experience with patient involvement in treatment decision-making underlines the significance of these factors and their influence on healthcare outcomes.

During my clinical practice, I encountered a middle-aged patient diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The patient was initially presented with standard management options, including lifestyle modifications, oral hypoglycemic agents, and in some cases, insulin therapy. However, the patient’s direct involvement in the decision-making process was limited at first, primarily due to healthcare provider-led directives. Over time, recognizing the importance of social determinants such as the patient’s low socioeconomic status, limited transportation, and low health literacy, the healthcare team tailored the management plan accordingly, integrating patient preferences and social context into care decisions.

This collaborative approach involved using a decision aid tailored for diabetes management, which explained treatment options in simple language, addressed concerns about medication costs, and incorporated the patient’s lifestyle preferences. The decision aid served as an effective tool, fostering patient engagement, and helping to clarify the implications of each option. As a result, the patient opted for a management plan emphasizing lifestyle changes supported by community resources, which ultimately improved adherence and glycemic control.

This experience demonstrated that when patient preferences and social determinants are explicitly considered, the treatment plan becomes more personalized, leading to better adherence and satisfaction. The social environment influences the patient’s capacity to adhere to the management plan; for example, financial constraints may limit medication use, making affordable yet effective options more appropriate. Conversely, neglecting these factors could have led to poor adherence, medication non-compliance, and suboptimal outcomes.

The inclusion of social determinants of health in shared decision-making ensures that health interventions are feasible and sustainable within the patient’s social context. For instance, understanding a patient’s educational level can inform the complexity of health education provided, while awareness of socioeconomic barriers can prompt proactive solutions such as connecting patients with community resources or social services.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s decision aids function as essential resources in this process. They facilitate transparent communication, enhance understanding of complex medical choices, and empower patients to participate actively in decisions affecting their health. These tools are particularly valuable in managing chronic conditions like diabetes, where ongoing patient engagement is critical.

In my practice, I plan to utilize the decision aid inventory to identify evidence-based tools relevant to specific patient needs. Incorporating decision aids into clinical encounters can streamline communication, reduce decisional conflict, and foster shared decision-making. Furthermore, they can serve as educational supports that clarify uncertainties and provide clarity about risks and benefits, which is especially crucial for vulnerable populations with limited health literacy.

On a personal level, understanding the utility of decision aids encourages me to advocate for patient-centered approaches in all healthcare interactions. In everyday life, these tools can assist family members or friends facing health decisions, ensuring they are well-informed and actively involved in their care choices.

In conclusion, integrating patient preferences and social determinants of health into decision-making significantly improves healthcare outcomes. Decision aids play a vital role in this process, offering structured, understandable formats to facilitate effective communication and shared understanding. As healthcare professionals, embracing these tools and principles will enhance the quality of care and ensure choices align more closely with individual needs and circumstances.

References

  • Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1295–1296. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.10186
  • Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001378
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from https://decisionaid.ohri.ca
  • Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision making. Health Expectations, 17(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.x
  • Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practice. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32(4), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000174
  • Schneider, E. C., & Ingram, C. (2014). The role of social determinants in health disparities. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 7(4), 112–123.
  • Gordon, L., & Novick, R. (2016). Cultural competence in healthcare: A review of the literature. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(2), 65–70.
  • Kaissi, A. (2015). The impact of social determinants on health outcomes: A review. Global Journal of Health Science, 7(4), 85–94.
  • Frenk, J., & Chen, L. (2010). Improving health systems in low-income countries: A framework for action. The Lancet, 376(9754), 1277–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61896-7
  • Greenhalgh, T., & Wieringa, S. (2011). Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation' metaphor? A critical literature review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180

Related Assignments