Discussion Question 1: Planning And Control Measures For Thi

Discussion Question 1planning And Control Measuresfor This Discussio

For this discussion, you will generate content for your Final Project regarding plan evaluations that are associated with a product or service. As discussed in Chapter 12, planning and control processes should be integrated; that is, both processes should be used to obtain feedback that will allow the marketing team to successfully reach strategic objectives through the marketing plan. For your initial post, describe the importance of timely information flow/feedback in terms of your chosen healthcare organization and marketing plan. Based on your chosen product or service, why would it be important for managers and planners to obtain information concerning marketing results?

Why would reports for a particular timeframe (weekly, monthly, quarterly) be important concerning your product or service? How would the feedback in these reports be used to control the future of your marketing plan?

Paper For Above instruction

The integration of planning and control measures is pivotal in the effective management of healthcare marketing plans. Ensuring timely information flow and feedback allows healthcare organizations to adapt to dynamic market conditions, customer needs, and competitive landscapes, ultimately enhancing the likelihood of achieving strategic objectives. This paper explores the importance of such feedback mechanisms within a healthcare organization and discusses how periodic reporting influences marketing control and decision-making processes.

In the context of a healthcare organization, timely information flow is vital for several reasons. Healthcare markets are highly sensitive to external factors such as policy changes, technological advancements, patient preferences, and competitive actions. Immediate access to relevant data helps management identify issues or opportunities early, enabling prompt adjustments. For example, if a healthcare provider launches a new service, real-time data on patient inquiries, appointment bookings, and initial feedback can inform necessary modifications to marketing strategies to boost outreach and engagement.

Furthermore, accurate and timely feedback helps evaluate the effectiveness of marketing efforts. Regular insights into patient acquisition rates, campaign performance, and service utilization inform managers about what strategies are working and what areas need improvement. For instance, if a targeted advertising campaign for a wellness program yields low engagement within a certain demographic, managers can swiftly modify messaging or channels to better reach that audience. This responsiveness is essential for optimizing resource allocation and enhancing return on investment.

Obtaining marketing results information is particularly crucial for managers and planners because it directly influences strategic decision-making. Data-driven insights enable evidence-based adjustments, fostering continuous improvement and ensuring that the marketing plan remains aligned with organizational goals. For example, if patient satisfaction surveys reveal concerns about service accessibility, marketing strategies can be adjusted to emphasize new transportation options or telehealth services, thereby improving patient perceptions and participation.

Reporting at specific intervals, such as weekly, monthly, or quarterly, is significant because it offers structured opportunities to review progress and measure outcomes over manageable periods. Weekly reports might focus on immediate operational metrics such as appointment scheduling and service inquiries, providing quick feedback that facilitates short-term adjustments. Monthly reports may evaluate campaign effectiveness, patient feedback, and revenue figures, allowing for tactical shifts. Quarterly reports tend to offer a broader perspective on trends and strategic alignment, informing long-term planning and resource allocation.

The feedback garnered from these reports is instrumental in controlling and refining the marketing plan. For example, monthly reports highlighting a decline in patient engagement might prompt the deployment of targeted outreach programs. Similarly, quarterly reviews of overall marketing ROI can lead to reallocation of budgets to the most effective channels. These feedback mechanisms support a continuous improvement cycle, where strategic actions are informed by ongoing data collection and analysis, thereby enhancing the ability to meet organizational objectives effectively.

Paper For Above instruction

The implementation of performance evaluation within healthcare marketing requires systematic approaches to measure success and guide future strategies. Among various methods, the balanced scorecard (BSC) offers a comprehensive framework that aligns organizational activities with strategic objectives, ensuring balanced development across financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth perspectives. This section discusses how the BSC can be utilized by healthcare leaders to control policies and evaluate marketing effectiveness.

The balanced scorecard facilitates the identification of key performance indicators (KPIs) relevant to marketing goals. For a healthcare organization, these KPIs might include patient satisfaction scores, appointment adherence rates, brand awareness levels, digital engagement metrics, and revenue from marketing-driven services. By setting specific targets for each KPI, management can monitor progress continually and identify areas needing corrective action.

Implementing the BSC involves assigning responsibilities to various departments and individuals. For instance, the marketing team might be responsible for digital engagement and outreach metrics, while the patient services team might oversee patient satisfaction scores. Regular performance review meetings, aligned with BSC insights, enable cross-departmental communication about progress and challenges, fostering a culture of accountability.

The BSC also supports the evaluation of marketing strategies' success by providing a structured way to assess performance beyond mere financial outcomes. For instance, improvements in patient satisfaction and loyalty can be indicative of effective marketing and service quality. Conversely, declining engagement metrics might signal the need for strategic shifts, such as redesigning messaging or exploring new channels.

Furthermore, the BSC promotes continual feedback loops essential for adaptive management. As data on KPIs is collected and analyzed, healthcare managers can implement corrective measures—such as reallocating resources, refining messaging, or investing in new technology—to enhance marketing effectiveness. Over time, this approach facilitates continuous improvement, aligning marketing efforts with the overall strategic vision of the organization.

In conclusion, the balanced scorecard provides healthcare organizations with a robust framework for controlling policies, measuring performance, and driving strategic marketing success. It fosters a comprehensive view of performance across multiple dimensions, ensuring that the organization remains responsive to internal and external changes and continually advances toward its long-term goals.

References

• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
• Parsons, L. M. (2008). Using the balanced scorecard to measure hospital performance. Journal of Healthcare Management, 53(3), 202-213.
• Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business Press.
• Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Elbanna, S., & Child, J. (2007). The influence of stakeholders' expectations on strategic decision-making: Evidences from Egypt. Business Strategy Review, 18(1), 62-68.
• Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
• McFarlan, F. W. (1984). Information technology changes the way you compete. Harvard Business Review, 62(3), 98-103.
• Ginter, P. M., Duncan, W. J., & Swayne, L. E. (2018). Strategic management of health care organizations. Jossey-Bass.
• Brown, S. (2014). Healthcare marketing: A case study approach. Health Marketing Quarterly, 31(1), 1-8.