Discussion Question Five: Bases Of Power Conduct Research

Discussion Question Five Bases Of Powerconduct Research On French An

Conduct research on French and Raven’s five bases of power, which include coercive, legitimate, reward, referent, and expert power. For the first part of your post, choose five leaders, one for each of the power bases, and give a brief example to support why a leader’s use of power best exemplifies a certain power base. For the second part of your post, select any one of the following bullet points. Attempt to spread the bullet points out among class members (e.g., not have one bullet point answered by all course participants). Assess which base of power is most appealing to you from the perspective of both a leader and a follower.

Justify which leader seems the most successful, using specific examples and research to support your view. Propose a supported plan (three or four action steps) for how you (or the organization) might help one of the least successful leaders you chose to improve their leadership success. Analyze a leader that uses a good balance of the different bases of power. How does this leader compare to those who have a dominant style? Conclude your post with a three or four sentence summary of the most important point, lesson or takeaways from your research and analysis for your initial post.

Provide a substantive (500–1,000 words) initial discussion posting. Justify your answers with examples and reasoning. Comment on the initial postings of at least two peers. Your responses to other initial posts must be a 100 to 200 word minimum each. By the due date assigned, post your initial response to the Discussion Area.

Paper For Above instruction

The theory of power dynamics in leadership, as articulated by French and Raven, remains a foundational aspect of understanding effective leadership behavior. Their five bases of power—coercive, legitimate, reward, referent, and expert—offer a comprehensive framework to analyze how leaders influence followers and achieve organizational goals. In this discussion, I will identify exemplary leaders for each power base, analyze which power base is most appealing from a leadership and follower perspective, evaluate the most successful leader among my examples, and suggest strategies to bolster leadership effectiveness for the less successful leaders.

Leaders Exemplifying Each Power Base

Starting with coercive power, a quintessential example is Joseph Stalin, who relied heavily on fear, punishment, and repression to maintain control over the Soviet Union. Stalin’s coercive power was demonstrated through purges and executions, which instilled compliance and obedience but at the cost of moral integrity and long-term legitimacy. Moving to legitimate power, Queen Elizabeth II exemplified this base through her constitutional role. Her authority derived from constitutional legitimacy, tradition, and formal appointment, which commanded respect and adherence from her subjects without exerting overt control.

For reward power, Elon Musk exemplifies this base through his ability to motivate employees by offering stock options, bonuses, and incentives to innovate in companies such as Tesla and SpaceX. His reward power helps promote innovation and performance. Referent power can be exemplified by Oprah Winfrey, whose charisma, empathy, and personal influence foster admiration and loyalty among her followers, allowing her to inspire and motivate without formal authority.

Lastly, for expert power, Dr. Anthony Fauci offers an illustrative example. As a leading immunologist and public health expert, Fauci’s knowledge, credentials, and expertise have consistently directed public health policies and influenced leaders’ responses during health crises, demonstrating the power of specialized knowledge.

Assessment of Power Bases and Personal Appeal

Of the five power bases, referent power appeals most to me as a leader because it emphasizes influence through trust, admiration, and relational qualities. As a follower, referent power fosters emotional connections, motivation, and collaboration, creating a positive organizational culture. Conversely, coercive power, while effective in certain situations, tends to breed fear and resentment if overused, which can undermine long-term motivation.

Evaluating Leadership Success and Improvement Strategies

Among my examples, Queen Elizabeth II appears the most successful in a long-term, stable, and non-coercive manner. Her leadership demonstrated legitimacy and respect rooted in tradition and constitutional authority, ensuring stability over decades without resorting to force or coercion. Elon Musk’s success with reward and expert power also indicates effective leadership in innovation-driven fields, although his style sometimes skews toward authoritative measures.

To support the improvement of less successful leaders like Joseph Stalin, organizations can implement targeted development plans. First, training on ethical influence and leadership styles to replace reliance on coercion with more sustainable, positive influence methods. Second, mentorship programs to develop skills related to authentic and referent power, fostering relational influence rooted in trust and integrity. Third, setting clear metrics for leadership behavior to encourage accountability and ethical decision-making, reducing over-dependence on coercive tactics.

Balanced Power Use and Leadership Effectiveness

Leaders who effectively balance different bases of power tend to exhibit greater adaptability and relational competence. For example, a CEO who combines expert power in technical domains with referent power based on trust can inspire teams and foster innovation while maintaining legitimacy. This balanced approach contrasts with leaders who rely predominantly on one style, which may limit their influence to specific contexts or reduce their long-term effectiveness.

Conclusion

The most valuable lesson from this exploration of French and Raven’s bases of power is the importance of employing a versatile mix of influence strategies. Effective leaders leverage multiple power bases appropriately, fostering trust, respect, and ethical influence within their organizations. Developing an understanding of these dynamics can enhance leadership effectiveness, promote organizational stability, and cultivate sustainable influence.

References

• French, J.R.P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). University of Michigan.
• Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
• Goleman, D. (2000). Leadership that gets results. Harvard Business Review, 78(2), 78-90.
• Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational outcomes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.
• Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Allyn & Bacon.
• Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
• Hogg, M. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Social identity and leadership. In D. V. Day (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (pp. 469-493). Oxford University Press.
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Perspectives on leadership. Sage Publications.
• Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.