Discussion Rubric To Follow For Outstanding Performance

Discussion Rubric To Followoutstanding Performanceexcellent Performanc

Discussion Rubric to follow Outstanding performance Excellent performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 44 (44%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources 40 (40%) - 43 (43%) Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references 35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references 31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references 0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references Main Posting: Writing 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style Main Posting: Timely and full participation 10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation First Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth First Response: Writing 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited First Response: Timely and full participation 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation Second Response: Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives 8.5 (8.5%) - 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings 7.5 (7.5%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting 6.5 (6.5%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth 0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth Second Response: Writing 6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5.5 (5.5%) - 5.5 (5.5%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English 4.5 (4.5%) - 4.5 (4.5%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited 0 (0%) - 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited

Paper For Above instruction

The reproductive system encompasses essential biological functions that facilitate human reproduction through the development, maturation, and function of the male and female organs involved in conception and childbirth. Disorders of the reproductive system are widespread and can significantly impact physical health, emotional well-being, and social functioning. These disorders often present with overlapping symptoms and can be challenging to diagnose accurately, which requires healthcare providers to possess a comprehensive understanding of their pathophysiology and the influence of patient-specific factors such as age, genetics, and lifestyle.

Two prevalent reproductive system disorders I have selected are Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Both conditions exemplify common age-related and hormonal influences but manifest differently in male and female patients, with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical presentations. Exploring their similarities and differences sheds light on the complexity of reproductive disorders and emphasizes the importance of individualized diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)

PCOS is a complex endocrine disorder affecting females of reproductive age, characterized by hormonal imbalances involving androgen excess, ovulatory dysfunction, and polycystic ovaries. Its pathophysiology involves insulin resistance, which exacerbates hyperandrogenism and disrupts normal follicular development, leading to irregular menstrual cycles, infertility, and hirsutism (Goodarzi et al., 2018). The disorder’s presentation ranges from mild to severe, influenced heavily by genetic predisposition and lifestyle factors such as diet and activity level.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

BPH affects aging males, involving non-malignant enlargement of the prostate gland. The pathophysiology revolves around testosterone metabolism within the prostate, with dihydrotestosterone (DHT) playing a pivotal role in cellular proliferation (McVary et al., 2018). This enlargement compresses the urethra, resulting in obstructive urinary symptoms such as hesitancy, weak stream, and nocturia. Age-related hormonal changes and genetic factors significantly contribute to BPH development, similar to the hormonal influences seen in PCOS but in a different context.

Similarities and Differences

Both PCOS and BPH are influenced by hormonal factors—estrogen and androgen imbalances—that contribute to abnormal tissue growth and function. While PCOS involves excess androgens leading to ovarian cyst formation and reproductive impairments, BPH results from increased growth of prostate tissue driven by androgens. They share common risk factors such as aging and genetics but differ in their primary affected organs, clinical manifestations, and treatments (Demirci et al., 2020).

For instance, PCOS manifests predominantly in reproductive age women with symptoms like irregular periods and infertility, whereas BPH primarily affects older men with urinary symptoms. Their management strategies differ as well; hormonal therapy and lifestyle modifications are common to both but tailored to the specific endocrine environment and affected organ systems.

Impact of Patient Factors on Diagnosis and Treatment

The selected factor for this discussion is age. Age significantly influences the manifestation, diagnosis, and management of both PCOS and BPH. In younger women, PCOS is often diagnosed with hormonal assays, ultrasound imaging of ovaries, and assessment of metabolic factors (Azziz et al., 2016). Conversely, BPH diagnosis in older men involves digital rectal exams, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, and urinary flow studies. Age-related hormonal changes underpin the pathophysiology, making age a critical determinant in tailoring individualized treatment. Moreover, pharmacologic agents effective in younger women with PCOS, such as insulin sensitizers, may differ in efficacy or safety in elderly patients with BPH, necessitating age-specific considerations for optimal outcomes.

In conclusion, understanding the pathophysiology of reproductive system disorders and how patient factors like age influence their presentation and management is vital for healthcare providers. Personalized approaches considering these factors can improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy, ultimately enhancing patient quality of life and psychological well-being.

References

• Azziz, R., Carmina, E., Chen, Z., Dunaif, A., Laven, J. S., Legro, R. S., & Norman, R. J. (2016). Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 2, 16057.
• Demirci, S., Biberoglu, K., & Ozekinci, M. (2020). Endocrinology of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. In Urological Endocrinology (pp. 135-157). Springer, Cham.
• Goodarzi, M. O., Dumesic, D. A., Chazenbalk, G., & Azziz, R. (2018). Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 14(5), 270-284.
• McVary, K. T., Roehrborn, C. G., Avins, A. L., Barry, M. J., Bruskewitz, R. C., Donnell, R. F., ... & O’Leary, M. P. (2018). Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Journal of Urology, 199(3), 772-780.