Discussion Topic: The State Of The Economy And The Cau

Discussion Topic: Given the state of the economy and the causes of that state—think back to our online discussions a few weeks ago—what should be the appropriate mix of fiscal and monetary policy, from a Keynesian perspective? From a neoclassical perspective? Show each policy mix graphically using the AD/AS model. Which makes the most sense to you? Why?

The current state of the economy is often characterized by fluctuations such as recession, inflation, or stagnation, and understanding the appropriate policy responses requires a thorough analysis of underlying causes. Fiscal policy involves government spending and taxation decisions to influence economic activity, while monetary policy pertains to the management of the money supply and interest rates. Both Keynesian and neoclassical schools of thought offer distinct perspectives on how these tools should be employed based on economic conditions.

From a Keynesian perspective, the primary concern during economic downturns is insufficient aggregate demand (AD). Keynesians argue that when private sector demand falters, government intervention through expansionary fiscal policy—such as increasing government spending or cutting taxes—is necessary to boost AD and stimulate economic growth. Monetary policy can complement this approach by lowering interest rates to incentivize borrowing and investment. Graphically, as shown in the AD/AS model, this policy mix shifts the AD curve to the right, moving the equilibrium from a recessionary gap towards full employment at a higher price level if inflation encourages. This combination aims to directly increase demand and output, addressing cyclical unemployment and underutilization of resources.

Conversely, the neoclassical perspective emphasizes the importance of market flexibility and the self-correcting nature of the economy. Neoclassical economists advocate for minimal government intervention, believing that prices, wages, and interest rates are flexible and that markets tend to clear naturally over time. In this view, fiscal policy should be neutral or even contractionary during downturns, allowing markets to adjust organically. Monetary policy, according to neoclassical thought, should maintain stability by controlling inflation and avoiding excessive fluctuations in money supply. The AD/AS graph in this context demonstrates little role for active demand manipulation; instead, policies focus on maintaining long-term growth through supply-side reforms. The focus is on shifting the long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) outward through technological progress and increased productivity, rather than manipulating AD.

Graphical representations using the AD/AS model clearly illustrate these policy mixes. For Keynesians, the desirable policy involves shifting AD rightward from AD1 to AD2, closing the recessionary gap and restoring potential output. For neoclassical proponents, policy measures aim at maintaining LRAS growth, with any demand-side shifts viewed as temporary or destabilizing. The neoclassical approach would prefer policies that support supply-side improvements, such as tax incentives for innovation or deregulation, rather than significant demand stimulation.

In my judgment, the Keynesian approach makes more sense in the current economic environment if the economy is facing a recession characterized by low demand, high unemployment, and idle capacity. During such periods, demand-side policies can provide immediate relief and restore growth. However, the neoclassical approach is vital for maintaining long-term stability and promoting sustainable growth through structural reforms. Ideally, a balanced mix that incorporates Keynesian demand-side measures in the short term and supply-side policies in the long run would be most effective and prudent.

References

• Blanchard, O. (2017). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Pearson.
• Krugman, P., & Wells, R. (2018). Economics (5th ed.). Worth Publishers.
• Mankiw, N. G. (2020). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
• Friedman, M. (2002). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.
• Congressional Budget Office. (2023). The Effects of Fiscal Policy. Congressional Budget Office Publications.
• Bernanke, B. S. (2007). The Strategy of Monetary Policy. Remarks before the New York Association for Business Economics.
• Rognlie, M. (2015). Deciphering the rise in house prices. Brookings Institution.
• Seater, J. (2018). The Role of Fiscal Policy in Economic Stabilization. American Economic Review.
• Lavoie, M. (2017). Post-Keynesian Economics: New Consensus or New Paradigm? Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review.