Dissemination Of EBP And Research, Such As Presenting Result ✓ Solved

Dissemination of EBP and research, such as presenting results

Dissemination of evidence-based practice (EBP) and research, such as presenting results at a conference or writing an article for a journal, is an important part of professional practice. Identify one professional journal and one nursing or health care conference where you might present your project. Discuss why each of your choices is the best option for you to disseminate your new knowledge.

Paper For Above Instructions

Introduction

Effective dissemination of nursing and health care knowledge is essential to translate research findings into clinical practice, improve patient outcomes, and advance the profession. The field increasingly emphasizes knowledge translation—the process of moving evidence into practice and policy—through multiple channels, including peer‑reviewed journals and professional conferences (Institute of Medicine, 2001; Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). Selecting appropriate venues requires aligning the project’s aims, audience, and dissemination goals with the strengths and reach of each channel. A well‑chosen journal can provide rigorous peer review and lasting scholarly impact, while a conference can offer rapid feedback, networking, and opportunities to influence practice among practitioners and leaders. The following analysis identifies one professional nursing journal and one nursing/health care conference that are well suited to disseminate a typical EBP project and why these choices are optimal for achieving practice change and scholarly visibility (Greenhalgh et al., 2004; Graham, Logan, Harrison, Straus, & Tetroe, 2006).

Journal Choice

Chosen journal: Journal of Nursing Scholarship (JNS). The Journal of Nursing Scholarship is a peer‑reviewed publication that targets nurse researchers, educators, and clinician‑scholars, with a strong emphasis on translating evidence into nursing practice and education. Its readership spans bench to bedside, which helps ensure that findings from EBP projects reach both scholars and frontline practitioners. JNS publishes articles that integrate theory, evidence, and practice implications, making it an appropriate venue for disseminating projects that test practice changes, implementation strategies, or EBP interventions in real‑world settings (Melnyk & Fineout‑Overholt, 2019). The journal’s emphasis on implications for patient care increases the likelihood that clinic leaders, educators, and policy makers will consider adopting the reported recommendations, thereby accelerating translation into practice (Greenhalgh et al., 2004). Moreover, journal publication provides a citable, permanent record of the work and typically offers robust methodological scrutiny through peer review, which can strengthen credibility and credibility with clinical audiences (Sackett et al., 1996).

Rationale for fit includes audience alignment, scope, and potential impact. JNS routinely features practice‑oriented reports and evidence syntheses that demonstrate relevance to bedside care, quality improvement, and patient outcomes—core interests for many practicing nurses and health professionals seeking to apply EBP locally or within organizations. Publishing in JNS supports dissemination to nursing program directors, clinical leaders, and practitioners who influence policy at hospital and system levels. The journal’s open, internationally accessible platform also fosters broader readership and potential cross‑institution collaboration, which is valuable for scaling successful interventions (Institute of Medicine, 2001; Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).

In preparing a manuscript for JNS, it is important to follow author guidelines, including structuring the paper to emphasize the problem, the EBP intervention, its implementation, outcomes, and practical implications for nursing practice. The manuscript should clearly articulate how the project contributes to existing evidence, describe context and barriers to adoption, and offer actionable recommendations for practice change that readers can implement. This aligns with knowledge translation concepts that emphasize not only generating evidence but also facilitating its uptake in clinical settings (Graham et al., 2006; Dobbins et al., 2009).

In summary, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is an appropriate, credible, and impactful outlet for disseminating a nursing EBP project to a broad and engaged audience of researchers and clinicians who are positioned to interpret, critique, and apply the findings to improve patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019; Greenhalgh et al., 2004).

Conference Choice

Chosen conference: Sigma Theta Tau International Biennial Convention. The STTI Biennial Convention is a premier international gathering for nurses and health professionals focused on leadership, evidence‑based practice, and innovations in care delivery. Conferences of this scale bring together researchers, educators, clinicians, administrators, and policy makers from diverse settings, creating a fertile environment for disseminating findings from EBP projects to a broad audience. The conference offers multiple presentation formats, including poster sessions and podium presentations, which can accelerate feedback, critique, and discussion necessary for refining the work and informing next steps in implementation (Graham et al., 2006). The STTI convention also provides networking opportunities with potential collaborators, funding sources, and mentors who can support dissemination, grant writing, and dissemination planning (STTI, 2016).

Rationale for fit includes audience reach, dissemination speed, and opportunities for practice impact. The STTI Biennial Convention attracts attendees from around the world who are invested in nursing science, education, and practice transformation. Presenting at a major conference can generate early attention for the work, allow the investigator to gauge reception and feasibility of broader adoption, and identify potential champions in clinical settings who can drive implementation efforts. The conference environment supports immediate, iterative exchange—vital for refining dissemination materials (e.g., abstracts, posters, slide decks) to resonate with practitioners and leaders. Abstract submission deadlines and review processes require concise, compelling summaries that highlight significance, methods, outcomes, and practice implications, which can sharpen the overall dissemination strategy (Graham et al., 2006; AHRQ, 2020).

In preparing for STTI, the project team should craft a clear abstract that emphasizes relevance to clinical practice, potential patient outcomes, and implementation considerations. Poster presentations can be especially effective for initial dissemination, inviting conversation about barriers and facilitators to adoption within different clinical contexts. If a podium presentation is pursued, the narrative should flow from problem identification to intervention, outcomes, and practical steps for replication or scaling. The convention also offers opportunities to engage with leaders who can champion broader dissemination, funding, and policy changes that support evidence‑based practice (Graham et al., 2006; WHO, 2013).

Overall, the Sigma Theta Tau International Biennial Convention is a superior venue for broad, strategic dissemination that targets both frontline clinicians and organizational leaders who can influence adoption and integration of EBP innovations across diverse care settings (STTI, 2016; AHRQ, 2020).

Strategic Alignment and Practical Steps

Choosing a journal and a conference is not only about reach but also about strategic alignment with dissemination goals. The journal provides a durable scholarly artifact and rigorous peer review, while the conference offers immediate feedback, networking, and opportunities to shape practice and policy discussions at a systems level. The combination supports a multi‑modal dissemination strategy that reaches different segments of the audience at different times in the knowledge translation process (Institute of Medicine, 2001; Greenhalgh et al., 2004).

Practical steps to maximize impact include: (1) identifying the core practice implication and a clear, actionable recommendation; (2) framing results in terms of patient outcomes, process improvements, and return on investment for adopting the change; (3) tailoring manuscripts and abstracts to the target venue, following submission guidelines and word limits; (4) planning for dissemination beyond publication, such as executive‑level summaries, campus or unit in‑services, and policy briefs; and (5) building a follow‑up plan for implementation and sustainability, including stakeholder engagement, pilot testing, and measurement strategies (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019; Dobbins et al., 2009).

Potential Challenges and Mitigation

Common challenges include balancing methodological rigor with clinical relevance, managing publication timelines, and ensuring generalizability across diverse clinical settings. To mitigate these challenges, authors should emphasize the practical implications of the work, provide clear guidance for replication or adaptation, and include limitations and context. Knowledge translation frameworks can guide the preparation of dissemination materials to facilitate uptake across settings (Graham et al., 2006; Greenhalgh et al., 2004). Proactive planning for post‑publication dissemination, such as presentations at departmental seminars, development of policy briefs, and collaboration with clinical leaders, can extend reach beyond the journal and conference audience (AHRQ, 2020; WHO, 2013).

Conclusion

Disseminating an EBP project through a well‑chosen professional journal and a major nursing conference provides complementary advantages: sustained scholarly credibility and broad practice influence, respectively. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship offers a rigorous venue for scholarly dialogue and practical guidance for educators and clinicians, while the Sigma Theta Tau International Biennial Convention provides a dynamic platform for real‑time feedback, networking, and leadership engagement that can accelerate adoption and scale of evidence‑based changes. An integrated, multi‑venue dissemination strategy—grounded in established knowledge translation principles and informed by audience needs—maximizes the likelihood that new knowledge will be understood, adopted, and sustained in diverse health care settings (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019; Institute of Medicine, 2001).

References

• Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
• Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. JAMA, 276(6), 470-474.
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: A systematic literature review. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.
• Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S., & Tetroe, J. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13-24.
• Dobbins, M., et al. (2009). Knowledge translation in health care: A synthesis of the literature. Implementation Science, 4, 1-7.
• Estabrooks, C. A., et al. (2003). Translating research into practice: The knowledge translation journey. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(3), 237-244.
• Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (2020). Dissemination and implementation research in health care: A primer. AHRQ.
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2013). Dissemination and implementation research in health: A guide for policy-makers. WHO.
• Sigma Theta Tau International (STTI). (2016). Guidelines for presenting nursing research at STTI conventions. STTI.