Distinguish Between An Upstream Sale Of Inventory And 834016

Distinguish between an upstream sale of inventory and a downstream sale. Why is it

The assignment requires an understanding of the differences between upstream and downstream sales of inventory and their significance in financial reporting and inventory management. An upstream sale involves the sale of goods from a downstream entity to an upstream entity, typically in a supply chain context, whereas a downstream sale involves the sale of goods from an upstream entity to a downstream entity, often from manufacturer to retailer or retailer to end customer. Recognizing whether a sale is upstream or downstream affects inventory valuation, revenue recognition, and profit margins.

In an upstream sale, inventory is transferred from a downstream entity (such as a distributor or retailer) back to an upstream entity (like a manufacturer or supplier). This scenario may occur during returns, rebranding, or inventory redistribution within the supply chain. It often requires a different accounting treatment, especially regarding de-recognition of inventory and revenue. Conversely, downstream sales are sales made from the seller up the supply chain toward the end consumer, with revenue typically recognized when control of goods transfers to the buyer.

Understanding whether a sale is upstream or downstream is critical because it influences the timing and recognition of revenue, inventory levels, and profit margins. For example, in a downstream sale, revenue is recognized when goods are shipped or delivered, and inventory decreases accordingly. In contrast, an upstream sale may involve inventory being returned or transferred backwards, affecting both the inventory valuation and recorded revenue. Proper classification ensures accurate financial statements, appropriate tax calculations, and compliance with accounting standards such as IFRS and GAAP.

Why is it important to know whether a sale is upstream or downstream?

Knowing whether a sale is upstream or downstream is essential for accurate financial reporting, inventory management, and assessing a company's profitability and cash flows. It affects revenue recognition rules, inventory valuation, and the proper recording of sales returns or transfers within the supply chain. Accurate identification helps prevent misstatements on financial statements, ensures compliance with accounting standards, and provides stakeholders with a clear understanding of business operations and supply chain dynamics.

What factors are used to determine a reporting entity’s functional currency? Provide at least one example for which a company’s local currency may not be its functional currency.

The determination of a reporting entity’s functional currency depends on several factors outlined in accounting standards such as IFRS and US GAAP. The primary factors include the currency that mainly influences sales prices, the currency of the country whose competitive forces and regulations mainly influence the entity’s operations, and the currency of the country whose economic environment mainly influences the entity’s cash flows. Additional considerations involve the currency in which funds are generated and used, the currency influencing labor, materials, and other costs, and the currency in which financing is obtained.

For example, a multinational company based in Japan may conduct most of its sales in US dollars, with significant cash flows originating from US markets. In this case, despite being incorporated and having its headquarters in Japan, the company’s functional currency could be the US dollar because it predominantly operates and earns revenues in that currency. This scenario illustrates how the local currency (Japanese Yen) may not necessarily be the functional currency if other factors dominate, such as the currency of sales and cash flows.

Another example involves a company in a country with hyperinflation where the local currency is unstable; it might choose to report in a stable foreign currency like the US dollar or euro. The key is identifying the currency that best reflects the economic effects of the underlying transactions, events, and conditions affecting the company.

On December 1, 20X1, Rone Imports, a U.S. company, purchased clocks from Switzerland for 15,000 francs (SFr), to be paid on January 15, 20X2. Rone’s fiscal year ends on December 31, and its reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The exchange rates are: December 1, 20X1 1 SFr = $0.70 December 31, 20X1 1 SFr = 0.66 January 15, 20X2 1 SFr = 0.68

The transaction is denominated in Swiss francs (SFr), which is the currency used for purchasing the clocks. Rone Imports is exposed to foreign exchange risk due to fluctuations in the SFr to USD exchange rate between the purchase date, the fiscal year-end, and the payment date.

Prepare journal entries for Rone to record the purchase, the adjustment on December 31, and the settlement.

Purchase of clocks on December 1, 20X1

On December 1, 20X1, Rone records the purchase and recognizes a payable in USD based on the spot rate on that date.

Journal Entry:

  • Debit Inventories or Purchases: $10,500 (15,000 SFr x $0.70)
  • Credit Accounts Payable: $10,500

This converts the foreign currency payable into USD at the initial rate.

Adjustment on December 31, 20X1

As of December 31, the payable must be re-measured at the current exchange rate to recognize any foreign exchange gain or loss.

Re-measurement: 15,000 SFr x $0.66 = $9,900

Difference: $10,500 - $9,900 = $600 loss

Journal Entry:

  • Debit Foreign Exchange Loss: $600
  • Credit Accounts Payable: $600

Settlement on January 15, 20X2

On January 15, 20X2, Rone pays the payable, which has been re-measured at the spot rate on that date.

Payment amount: 15,000 SFr x $0.68 = $10,200

Initially, the payable balance was $9,900 after the December 31 adjustment, so the current payable is $10,200. The difference reflects an exchange rate gain or loss.

Settlement journal entries:

  • Debit Accounts Payable: $10,200
  • Credit Cash: $10,200

In addition, since the payable was previously adjusted with a foreign exchange loss of $600, the overall journal records the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations on the payable.

Note: If the initial purchase and the subsequent adjustments consider the net amount payable, the total foreign exchange loss or gain at the time of settlement needs to be reflected accordingly in the financial statements.

Debra and Merina sell electronic equipment and supplies through their partnership. They wish to expand their computer lines and decide to admit Wayne to the partnership. Debra’s capital is $200,000, Merina’s capital is $160,000, and they share income in a ratio of 3:2, respectively. Required: Record Wayne’s admission for each of the following independent situations:

The partnership is considering Wayne’s admission under three different situations: (a) Wayne directly purchases half of Merina’s investment, (b) Wayne invests the amount needed to secure a one-third interest without recording goodwill or bonus, and (c) Wayne invests $110,000 for a one-fourth interest with goodwill recorded. These scenarios require adjusting the partnership’s capital accounts to reflect Wayne's investment and the valuation of partnership assets, particularly when goodwill is involved.

a. Wayne directly purchases half of Merina’s investment in the partnership

In this scenario, Wayne acquires a 50% interest in Merina’s partnership share. Merina's original capital is $160,000, and her interest is being split evenly. Wayne's purchase reduces Merina's capital and increases his capital proportionately.

Calculation:

  • Merina’s share: 2/5 of total partnership (since Debra and Merina share in 3:2 ratio, total ratio parts = 5)
  • Merina’s capital proportion: $160,000 / (200,000 + 160,000) = 0.44 (44%)
  • Wayne purchases half of Merina’s investment: 0.5 x $160,000 = $80,000

To record Wayne’s investment, the journal entry would be:

  • Debit Cash: $80,000
  • Credit Merina’s Capital: $80,000

This transaction increases Wayne’s capital account and reduces Merina’s capital accordingly, reflecting his partial purchase.

b. Wayne invests amount to give him a one-third interest with no goodwill or bonus

Here, Wayne invests enough for a one-third share in the partnership, based on the book value of existing capital. The total partnership capital before Wayne’s admission is $360,000 ($200,000 + $160,000).

Wayne’s required capital: 1/3 x $360,000 = $120,000

Since Wayne invests $120,000, the entry is straightforward:

  • Debit Cash: $120,000
  • Credit Wayne, Capital: $120,000

Balance adjustments are unnecessary because no goodwill or bonus is recorded in this scenario.

c. Wayne invests $110,000 for a one-fourth interest if Goodwill is to be recorded

This scenario introduces goodwill to account for the difference in valuation. The total implied value of the partnership is calculated as:

Total partnership value = Wayne’s investment / desired interest = $110,000 / 1/4 = $440,000

Existing total partnership capital: $360,000

Additional goodwill to be recorded: $440,000 - $360,000 = $80,000

Journal entries:

  • Debit Cash: $110,000
  • Debit Goodwill: $80,000
  • Credit Wayne, Capital: $120,000 (equivalent to total contribution + goodwill)

After recording these entries, Wayne becomes a 25% partner, and the partnership’s assets are valued at $440,000, including goodwill.

References

  • Graham, R. C., & Moon, P. (2018). Corporate Financial Accounting. Wiley.
  • International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2019). IFRS Standards. IFRS Foundation.
  • Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2019). Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Blocher, E., Stout, D. E., Cokins, G., & Lin, S. (2019). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J. J., & Warfield, T. D. (2020). Intermediate Accounting. Wiley.
  • Campbell, T. (2019). Financial Reporting and Analysis. Pearson.
  • Meigs, R., & Meigs, M. (2020). Financial Accounting. McGraw-Hill.
  • Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). (2019). Australian Accounting Standards. AASB.
  • Schroeder, R. G., Clark, M. W., & Cathey, J. M. (2019). Financial Accounting Theory and Analysis. Wiley.
  • IRS.gov. (2020). Partnerships & LLCs. Internal Revenue Service.