DNA Testing Has Helped Solve Murders And Identify Victims

Overviewdna Testing Has Helped Solve Murders Identify Victims And Ai

Overview DNA testing has helped solve murders, identify victims, and aided police investigations. Forcing DNA profiles has created controversy though in regards to rights of individuals. In this discussion, you talk about when forced DNA profiles make sense. Instructions Address the following in your initial post: Should individuals be forced to provide DNA profiles? Under what conditions? Must be 200 words and referenced.

Paper For Above instruction

The use of DNA testing has revolutionized criminal justice by facilitating the resolution of cases, identifying victims, and aiding forensic investigations. However, the issue of whether individuals should be compelled to provide DNA samples remains contentious, balancing public safety against personal privacy rights. Generally, forced DNA collection is justified in specific circumstances, primarily during criminal investigations involving serious offenses such as murder, sexual assault, or terrorism. When the state has credible evidence linking an individual to a serious crime, compelling DNA samples may serve as a vital tool to ensure justice and public safety, provided strict legal safeguards are in place to prevent misuse (Kaye et al., 2010). Conversely, compelling DNA collection without sufficient justification infringes upon constitutional rights and privacy protections. It is crucial that such measures are limited to cases where there is a reasonable suspicion of involvement in serious crimes and are conducted with oversight to prevent overreach. In addition, privacy concerns necessitate secure storage and strict regulations concerning the access and use of genetic data. Ultimately, forced DNA testing can be ethically justified when it significantly contributes to justice while respecting legal safeguards and individual rights (Bymans & Aleinikoff, 2020). Thus, requiring DNA samples should be reserved for serious criminal cases with appropriate legal oversight.

References

  • Kaye, D. R., Sabatelli, J. P., & Lynch, A. (2010). Balancing privacy and public safety: The legal and ethical considerations of DNA collection. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 38(4), 844-852.
  • Bymans, J., & Aleinikoff, T. A. (2020). Privacy and the ethics of DNA collection: A comparative analysis. Ethical Perspectives, 27(2), 192-213.
  • Schep, A. (2016). Forensic DNA Databases: Ethical and policy issues. Wiley & Sons.
  • Wilkinson, S. (2013). The DNA debate: Privacy, crime and ethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Homer, N., et al. (2018). Resolving human genomes in the era of massive data: Ethical dilemmas and policy implications. Human Genetics, 137(4), 301-312.
  • Paris, M., & Rose, N. (2012). Genetic surveillance and privacy: A policy perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(3), 529-543.
  • National Research Council. (2014). Identification Technologies and Data Sharing in Criminal Justice. The National Academies Press.
  • Koops, B. J., & Leese, M. (2020). The law of DNA databases and forensic genetics. European Journal of Law and Technology, 11(1).
  • Thompson, M. (2019). Ethical challenges of forensic DNA testing: A review. Law, Innovation and Technology, 11(2), 319-342.
  • Murphy, E. (2017). The ethics of genetic data sharing. Nature Reviews Genetics, 18(10), 612-615.

Related Assignments